Wesley van Harskamp

A gamer went viral on Reddit after his C: drive renamed itself to “Batman Arkham Knight”. He downloaded a pirated game and got infected with malware. He had to format the entire PC.

‘The Super Mario Bros. Movie’ star Anya Taylor-Joy says she threw up the first time she voiced Princess Peach: “I did not realize how taxing it would be because you’re yelling continuously the whole time.”

the "perverts make great art" thing going around is actually the best critique of AI art anyone's stumbled into. kojima's voyeurism, tarantino's teenage-geek kinks, or yoko taro saying he designed 2B because he likes to look at beautiful women: all of these people are auteurs of incredible bodies of work honesty about desire creates trust, trust is what lets an audience surrender to the work. AI prompts contain the language of desire but no psyche generating it the model averages millions of people's wanting into a statistical mean, which reads as no one's wanting. the output is technically impressive yet energetically flat great art requires someone willing to be confident where others are embarrassed

You're a fucking idiot if you really believe ProZD and YongYea did any damage. You don't even care about the English VA industry. You spend more time bashing it than anything else. It's funny how mfs don't care about dubs or dub VAs, but always the first ones talking shit. GTFOH

There’s a pattern we should talk about that has quietly killed a lot of great games over the years. It usually pans out like so: 1) Developers listen to players and think they do them a favor by giving them exactly what they asked for. 2) Players love it - at first. 3) After that, for some 'mysterious' reason, players lose interest and the game slowly dies and nobody is quite sure why that happened. The truth is that players will always push for fewer restrictions. They'll always argue for endless farming, easy power creep, never getting locked out of any content, making things more convenient, removing any sort of gates, etc. etc. And usually, even if you give in to things that will hurt a game in the long run, you get applause, at first. But you also just removed some of the very things that made the game special. Magic in games often comes from limitations. Scarcity, anticipation, effort, friction... all of these things have meaning. And if you remove those out of the equation, you logically remove meaning. Christmas is magical exactly because it happens once a year. If you had Christmas every day, you wouldn’t make it better - you’d destroy what made it special. As a parent, I know how excited my boys are when December hits and they start dreaming about how amazing Christmas will be. They start talking about which awesome presents they'll receive and every day they come up with new things. The parents challenge is then to intently listen and to understand what your kid really wishes for - and after thoughtful deliberation, you turn THAT into their present. You don't give them everything they wanted, you give them what they deep down truly wished for. And that's what makes it magical for them, because you actually spent the time and were thoughtful enough to truly understand who they are. And the same is true for games. When everything is always available, then: - Nothing feels special - Nothing is worth planning for - Nothing creates stories anymore You’ve optimized the fun out of the system. We’ve seen this over and over: You remove keys, costs, or gates and players gleefully cheer you on. But suddenly: - The gameplay loop breaks - The economy collapses - The sense of progression disappears Another example: social friction. The magic of early World of Warcraft was that it was basically the first social network. You had to actively talk to people, organize raids, build relationships and in the process a lot of people created life-long friends. Then players kept asking for features like LFG and developers caved in with the argument that removing friction is good. But suddenly, your friends didn't need you anymore. You weren't seen as an important part of their group anymore, you became an annoying obstacle that could be side-tracked. And losing your friends is a horrible feeling, as it should be. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Players are very good at optimizing for short-term satisfaction. But they are incredibly bad at protecting long-term fun. THAT is the developer’s job. Sometimes you have to stand your ground and say no. Not to frustrate players, but to protect their experience. Because if you give players everything they want… You might be taking away the reason they loved your game in the first place.

so did anyone end up breaking this thing or was it just dumb mass panic

What would you do with this space?