Will LaMarche

@Morecryptoonl Do triangles happen more in crypto than traditional equities in your experience?

About Elliott Wave Triangles: A triangle is always a corrective wave pattern with an ABCDE-structure. It is classed as sideways correction and represents a balance of forces: "the market has not made up its mind yet". The most important facts: - Triangle waves are labelled A-B-C-D-E and subdivide into 3 sub-waves each (3-3-3-3-3) - The triangle typically breaks out to the opposite side of wave E With triangles, the key thing to understand is that you don’t start by trying to “force” an A–E labeling. You first step back and ask what role the structure is likely playing in the bigger picture. Triangles almost always show up as pauses, not as engines. They are corrective by nature and usually appear as wave B, wave 4, or occasionally wave X. That context already limits what you should expect from price behavior. The A wave of a triangle doesn’t need to look impulsive at all. In fact, if it does, that’s often a red flag. Triangles are built from overlapping, corrective legs right from the start. So instead of hunting for a perfect A, it’s more useful to watch whether price starts to contract, overlap, and lose momentum while staying within converging boundaries. If that’s happening consistently, you’re probably dealing with a triangle, even if the internal labels feel a bit messy. The E wave is where many people overthink things. E waves are often disappointing. They can be shallow, truncated, or just messy sideways moves. The real confirmation doesn’t come from perfectly placing E, but from what happens after. Once a triangle is complete, price should exit relatively quickly and cleanly in the direction of the larger trend. If that breakout lacks momentum or immediately overlaps again, then either the triangle isn’t done yet or it wasn’t a triangle to begin with. If price is “trying” to go up but keeps overlapping and stalling, that’s not a confirmed post-triangle move yet. It can still be part of the triangle, or part of a broader corrective structure. In Elliott Wave, trying is not confirmation. Structure is. Triangles don’t need a clean A wave, E waves are often ugly, and the real validation always comes after the structure breaks. Until you see a clear exit with follow-through, it’s best to treat the whole thing as still corrective and stay flexible with the count.

@martypartymusic @benjamincowen They’re not going against his narrative? lol

@benjamincowen FOMC went against your narrative - we rise on fresh M2. Feel free to join the Space and discuss your new narrative.

Bitcoin breaks through the 200 day moving average on the 4hr on FOMC guidelines. @benjamincowen was wrong. Re-enter you were warned. The cycle is a liquidity cycle not a Bitcoin specific reward cycle.

@Morecryptoonl Mike Alf.. he just posted something along the lines then you made this tweet haha

@will_lamarche36 I dont know Alfred, but I know many with a hero complex haha

Hero complex season on X is wild It’s fascinating how many people on X need to feel legendary.

@BobLoukas Sarcasm

Steady lads, the institutions are coming..

@Morecryptoonl Wondering your thoughts on a leading diagonal for a wave 1?

The $BTC bounce played out as expected. We are now entering the next resistance zone.

@SantiagoAuFund Any thoughts on when this finishes? Showing on TV lines of people looking to buy bullion. Top signal..?

Going to be weird when a day comes that gold is not up $50…

@BenVerlander Ben

3 months ago I compared Aaron Judge to Babe Ruth and Barry Bonds (who I consider to be the greatest hitter ever) But Yankees fans just love blowing things up when they feel wronged

@Morecryptoonl How do you chart something like that? A failed triangle, or just an ABC structure? If you see that in BTC somewhere you should go over it in one of your videos!🙏

@will_lamarche36 Yes it's rare to see all waves filled

Triangles look clean in theory, but in practice they’re fragile. They’re rare patterns in Elliott Wave. They often break out early instead of playing to the end. Fibonacci ratios (38.2–61.8% extensions) act only as loose guidelines, not hard rules. When you see a contracting triangle, stay cautious. It’s more a sign of market indecision than a reliable setup. The real move usually comes after the triangle fails or completes. They are often found in wave 4 or B-wave structures.

@Morecryptoonl This is suggesting an alt coin season going into Q1? But Q4 is also suggested as probable topping range (also considering last 2 cycles) What do you make of these countering scenarios

In August, altcoins often rally. By September, $BTC dominance usually comes back for revenge.

@realcryptoface look at the BONK monster

@Morecryptoonl He’s even missing waves 6 and 7 smh

This is exactly why Elliott Wave has lost credibility in recent years. Everyone slaps numbers on a chart without knowing the rules. Respect to anyone who tries, but calling this a “clean structure” is misleading to followers. With reach comes responsibility.

@Morecryptoonl Between Bonk & Render, which looks more constructive to you

$Render has been consolidating after a strong run from its 2022 low. The chart suggests the next big move higher could eventually target around $17.40, but we don’t yet have clear confirmation that a new uptrend has started. A break above $5.50 would be an early sign that a bottom is in and momentum is shifting higher, with resistance to watch around $12 before the bigger target comes into play. On the downside, if price slips under the June low at $2.60, the correction may extend further. A break below $1.49 would be a much more serious signal, likely pointing toward a larger decline toward $0.43 or even lower. For now, the broader trend can stay constructive as long as these supports hold. #Render $RNDR

@Morecryptoonl Any chance you could cue me in on why it’s unlikely? 🙏

@will_lamarche36 unlikely in my view, but valid

$BTC: The price has reached $112.940 fibonacci support. A break above $115,950 is needed to indicate that the bulls are trying to take the lead.

@Morecryptoonl So you’re saying as long as it’s a 3-3-3-3-3, it can be labeled a diagonal WITHOUT having to fulfill the overlap rule?

One of the biggest Elliott Wave misunderstandings comes from old-school guidelines. In a diagonal, Wave 1 and Wave 4 must overlap, right? Not necessarily. In modern markets, that 'rule' can break; and when it does, many traders wrongly label a diagonal as a corrective move. Result? Missed opportunities and bad positioning. Adapt the theory to the market, not the market to the theory.

@Morecryptoonl Or.. is this whole thing NOT a wave 4, but a WXYXZ B wave with a final C wave to come instead of the wave 5..?

@Morecryptoonl Elliot Wave Principle: Wave 4 characteristics often start boring & end in a flushing fear that a top came sooner than we were ready for. Then the wave 5 begins..

The best trades often look uncomfortable when they first appear. That’s why most people miss them.

@Morecryptoonl Top call?

A few months ago, $100K BTC was a fantasy. Now it’s normal.. and people are bored. That’s the signal. Complacency at ATHs is a setup. Watch what happens next.