Will McEllen

8.4K posts

Will McEllen banner
Will McEllen

Will McEllen

@willmcellen

A man of ordinary common sense and average luck. I'm opposed to amoral manipulation and toxic empathy. GSD=Best Dog

Katılım Temmuz 2022
1K Takip Edilen498 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
Why I married her, Reason #263... Will fight off a bear to protect my dog.
English
7
4
51
2.4K
Freg
Freg@Chootum_·
@40G2248176 @willmcellen @RobProvince lol. I was gonna reply saying this exact thing but then I was figured this was probably some dumb ass kid making a stupid meme.
English
1
0
1
5
EducatëdHillbilly™
EducatëdHillbilly™@RobProvince·
We have to bring in millions of people who can’t speak English because Americans can’t park trucks on train tracks…..
English
58
195
1.9K
50.1K
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@RealJessica "And they were captives to our state" Good to know that's how she looks at people.
English
0
0
0
5
Based Jessica
Based Jessica@RealJessica·
New York Gov Kathy Hochul is begging wealthy people who have moved to Florida and Texas to come back to New York and pay taxes. 🤣 "I need people who are high net worth to support the generous social programs that we want to have in our state. Now, there are some patriotic millionaires who stepped up. OK, cut me the checks if you want to be supportive, but maybe the first step should be go down to Palm Beach and see who you can bring back home." "I have to look at the fact that we are in competition with other states who have less of a tax burden on their corporations and their individuals. And I would say remote work changed everything." "There were people who could only work in an office in Manhattan and work in New York state. And they were captives to our state, they were going to stay. We saw that that's not the case. Wall Street businesses looking at Texas, they're not going there because they have a nicer governor. They're going there because of the tax rate."
English
8.4K
3.9K
17.7K
2.9M
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
So, why not propose an amendment to the act which would help US Service Members so that they could use their Military ID to vote? Wait a sec... what's this then? It's already included in Section 2 Para 3?!?: "official United States military identification card, together with a United States military record of service showing that the applicant's place of birth was in the United States." Also, in case any Active Duty need to get their record of service, here's a quick cheat sheet for on-line copies (or you should be able to go to a RAPIDS site or your Unit/Personnel Office): Army: Use the Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) at iperms.hrc.army.mil (CAC required). This provides access to your Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), including service history, assignments, awards, and other details you can view/print. Air Force: Access through the Air Force Personnel Center systems or milConnect for personnel records. Navy: Use the Electronic Service Record (ESR) via MyNavyHR or related portals. Marine Corps: Access OMPF documents via milConnect (DPRIS section). Coast Guard: Access the Coast Guard Military Human Resources Record (CGMHRR) via iPERMS or milConnect.
English
0
0
0
33
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@grey4626 Not the first time in history. Won't be the last. Honor the service, critique the change in ideology.
Will McEllen tweet media
English
0
0
6
545
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
I'm going to fucking say it, because someone bloody needs to. It doesn’t matter if you bled in Fallujah, commanded battalions in Kandahar, or pinned on stars while the Republic still believed in you. It doesn’t matter if you can recite the Ranger Creed backward in your sleep or if your chest rattles with enough ribbons to blind a lesser man. None of it registers. Not one goddamn second of it. Because the moment you choose betrayal...any flavor of it, whether selling out the Constitution for a foreign handler, leaking secrets to the highest bidder, or simply kneeling before the domestic machine that hollows this nation from the inside...you ceased to be a soldier. You became pathology incarnate. A metastatic cell in the body politic. The kind of rot that history names once and then spits on forever: Benedict Arnold with modern camouflage and a pension. The same fractured ego that once let you swear the oath..."I will support and defend… against all enemies, foreign and domestic”...is the exact fracture that later rationalizes selling that oath for power, relevance, or thirty pieces of silver. You didn’t slip. You didn’t “evolve.” You revealed the predator wiring that was always there, waiting for the right incentive to flip. Loyalty isn’t a skill set you list on LinkedIn; it is the existential core of the warrior. When that core collapses, everything else...tactics, leadership, courage...becomes costume. A well-decorated lie. And you become seen for what you are: vectors of treason. Your “experience” is irrelevant data. Your scars? Just scar tissue over a soul already necrotic. Your stories around the fire? Propaganda for the naïve. The only metric left is the single, irrevocable act of betrayal, and it stains every frame of your existence like blood that never dries. This isn’t politics. This isn’t opinion. This is the cold, lethal arithmetic of survival. Nations die when their guardians become their gravediggers. You betrayed the Republic. That is the only epitaph you will ever deserve. The rest is just noise from a dead man walking. 🗡️💀⚖️
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
581
1.5K
5.4K
125.2K
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@Reelix @vxunderground Really? A website tracks visits and gathers basic information? They also directly tell you this so that you can decide whether or not to use them? Say it ain't so! Good thing you don't use a service like X. With everything they gather, it would be silly to use that site.
English
1
0
0
6
Reelix
Reelix@Reelix·
@willmcellen @vxunderground With a statement like this, I wouldn't exactly be citing them as a reputable source. "We sell your info to around a thousand companies" isn't something a trustworthy group does.
Reelix tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
vx-underground
vx-underground@vxunderground·
United States President Donald J. Trump posted this message on social media today. Personal grievances the Trump administration it asserts it has with other countries and political theatrics aside, the notion that the United States even hints are exiting NATO is a PROFOUND cybersecurity issue. Yes, NATO deals with traditional military stuff (land, sea, air, space), NATO also deals with things in the digital domain (cyberspace). NATO (non-United States) has historically shared a great deal of intelligence with each other regarding state-sponsored threats to the United States. Likewise, the United States has shared intelligence on state-sponsored with our NATO allies. It makes me incredibly nervous that this idea of exiting NATO is floated or threatened. NATO cybersecurity space deals a lot with ICS/SCADA (Industrial Control Systems, which is things like water treatments plants, nuclear energy facilities, telecommunication systems, etc) and anything else which possesses a military threat to the United States and it's citizens. I am unsure of the impact leaving NATO would have on our cybersecurity intelligence. The idea makes me very nervous. The United States is constantly under siege from foreign adversaries (notably China, Russia, North Korea, Iran). Additionally, I have great concern that if we left NATO it would damage our relationship with European allies which have been of significant importance apprehending Threat Actors who have done extreme damage to the United States. Part of the FBI's success in apprehending ransomware actors have been our strong relationship with EUROPOL, and European allies apprehending individuals residing outside the United States. Chat, this unironically makes me very nervous.
vx-underground tweet media
English
72
79
916
55.5K
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@Reelix @vxunderground You realize that's the 'archaic' and basically obsolete definition? Cambridge Dictionary, and most others, now define it as, "to kill a large number of something, or to reduce something severely."
English
1
0
0
14
Trouvo
Trouvo@Trouvo_Souvok·
@vxunderground The 5 eyes program is not tethered to nato Are you saying we should keep paying for everything because even tho they dont live up to their agreements at least they do this other thing that is not part of the nato agreement?
English
8
0
15
2.8K
BudFoot108
BudFoot108@BudFoot108·
@unlimited_ls If he is an active duty marine, does he question his officers orders when given? No he does not. So questioning the police when giving an order doesn’t make sense.
English
29
0
7
1.4K
Unlimited L's
Unlimited L's@unlimited_ls·
NEW: Marine files lawsuit alleging San Diego police slammed his head on pavement outside a bar, leaving him with a traumatic brain injury Miguel Ozuna, 23, an active-duty Marine, claims a San Diego police officer slammed his head onto the pavement outside El Perron in the Gaslamp District on June 15, 2025 Ozuna said he had been performing with his band, helped staff clean up, and was trying to order an Uber when officers approached and asked to see his phone. He refused, saying, “I wasn't doing anything wrong. It's my right to say no.” He alleges an officer then grabbed him, threw him to the ground headfirst, and that three officers piled on... ...punched him multiple times while handcuffing him, leaving him with a traumatic brain injury Ozuna was arrested and held for several hours before being released without any citation or criminal charges
English
49
78
362
17.2K
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@FT It's ok. One person familiar with US weaponry told me that all of the missiles had 'best by' dates on them and they were almost expired. We had to use them now or just throw them out with the expired milk.
English
0
0
2
579
Financial Times
Financial Times@FT·
It is a ‘massive expenditure of Tomahawks’, said one person familiar with the US military’s use of weaponry, as the rapid depletion of stockpile raises pressure on Donald Trump over the rising cost of the conflict. ft.trib.al/rmTi77n
Financial Times tweet media
English
209
601
1.6K
961.2K
You✍️Hana🗽
You✍️Hana🗽@G75_08M·
You say convicted, but most rapes are not reported. Thinking about consequences is important. A room with 100 drunk men isn’t safe always, no. but it isn’t automatically dangerous either. Sexual assault usually involves discusting behaviours before it happens. That 1% risk would likely be close to zero in a room of drunk women. But in the end, risk depends on the situation.
English
23
0
11
7.6K
Gad Saad
Gad Saad@GadSaad·
Less than 1% of all men will ever be convicted of rape. This is why it is deeply misandrist to say that it is men who commit rape. My uncle Joe, my brother Roscoe, and my father Harry have never raped anyone. This is why you should all advise your daughters to enter a room alone with 100 drunk men. Only 1% of them is likely a rapist so she should stop being bigoted against all men. Even if the number is at 5-6%, she should still risk it because otherwise it is pure bigotry.
English
134
194
3K
188.2K
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
The FSO has access to DISS (JPAS went end-of-life years ago). The full SF-86 (the document you referenced) is not accessible through DISS. Although, yes, China did get most of everyone's information when they breached OPM back in 2015. Still waiting for someone to be held responsible for that massive 'oopsie'. A key note, you really need the individual's Social Security Number to look up anyone in DISS. So, in order to use DISS to dox someone, you'd first need their SSN... which pretty much means you already know who they are. The main information an FSO can access via DISS is the subject's full name, date/place of birth, and current clearance eligibility. Not a massive trove of the person's history. However, again, it still requires the subject's SSN to gain this info. Activities in DISS are also monitored, so an FSO who did use their login to gain access to someone's record, for which they had no legitimate need, would potentially find themselves in a world of hurt.
English
0
0
1
29
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻
🚨🚨🚨It’s really bad folks, I can see why this man got death threats. They ABUSED their POSITIONS to try to destroy a man and his family. They need to be stripped of their SECURITY CLEARANCES. Which is likely how he was doxed. I need to rest a bit. The more I peel away, the worse these folks get. I just couldn’t stop, and I’ve been up all night.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

Hello Mr. Evans, Today, War on the Rocks published a "rebuttal" which disclosed the real-life identity of @CynicalPublius . What the article did not mention: you had already posted his name on Bluesky before the WOTR piece published. The WOTR article cited his being “already known” as justification for printing his name. The person who made him “already known” was you. You manufactured the predicate for your own publication’s decision. You then blocked me. And then called me out. Repeatedly. You engaged me, mentioned me, tagged me — even said publicly that you were looking forward to what I had written about War on the Rocks. Blocking someone on a platform and then continuing to publicly engage them is not what a person who wants to be left alone does. It is what a person who wants the attention without the accountability does. You're framing your own just desserts as a “mass witch hunt” initiated by a Hello post I addressed to Brad Duplessis, your contributor, who named Cynical Publius in his debut WOTR piece without disclosing that Anderson’s recommendations for War College reform included eliminating the kind of permanent civilian faculty position Duplessis holds. You are being dunked on because of what you did to Cynical Publius, not because of anything I wrote. Blaming the letter for the blowback is like blaming the smoke alarm for the fire. Cynical Publius wrote that military institutions had drifted from their original professional mission toward ideological conformity and required reform. You responded by publishing his name. The question your letter to me does not answer — and the question a lot of people are now asking — is why an outlet that once existed to challenge that kind of institutional behavior became the one enforcing it. You yourself provide answers to that question. You launched War on the Rocks because you understood something true: the United States had spent two decades losing wars it shouldn't have lost. Twelve years later, when a pseudonymous retired Army officer argues that the War Colleges have drifted from warfighting competence toward ideological conformity, the platform you built publishes his name in the opening sentence. That is not an accident of character. It is how institutions stop being able to learn. Armies that cannot receive criticism cannot conduct honest after-action review. Institutions that cannot correct what they're getting wrong keep losing — and keep being surprised that they're losing, because the people tasked with explaining the failures are the same people defending the institutions that produced them. In short: Mr. Evans, you have been captured by the foreign policy expert class has presided over Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. And you don't even realize it. Wake up. And be on the lookout for a Substack article where I explain your history more thoroughly.

English
44
881
3.4K
102.8K
Reddit Lies
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies·
The top mod of /r/mtf has responded to the allegations of hosting and protecting a registered sex offender on their mod team. - Didn't address the accusations of them attempting to defend the SO by recommending they create an alt account so they could remain on the team - Has claimed the mod became a registered SO when they were 17 (not in their 20s as reduxx reported) - Describes themselves as a "Guardian" of the subreddit and spent most of the time talking about themselves - Instantly locked the thread to prevent any discussion about this
Reddit Lies tweet media
English
61
162
2.2K
95.1K
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
I just want one thing this year: a new law that states that, "No elected official or appointed member of government shall be exempted from any laws created by the government." Then we might see some actual change.
English
0
0
0
12
REDUXX
REDUXX@reduxx·
A top transgender Reddit moderator has deleted his account after being exposed as a convicted child sex offender. Branden "Brynn" Dunleavy was a moderator at r/MTF, and was reportedly protected by the head of the moderation team. reduxx.info/transgender-re…
English
1.9K
8.4K
37.9K
76.9M
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
It's a good sentiment and I agree with you in spirit. It would be an excellent world if that is all it takes. But I'm too much of a pragmatist to see that as a realistic path forward. Sometimes it will take doing not-so-nice things in order stop the bad things. An interesting story you may enjoy... an accused killer by the name of Josh Monson was in court when he grabbed a pencil and stabbed his lawyer in the neck. A new court date was set and a new lawyer appointed. At the 2nd trial, he again grabbed a pencil and stabbed his 2nd lawyer in the neck. Mistrial, new court date, and new lawyer. For the third time in court, the judge ordered Monson restrained since he could not be trusted. The 3rd lawyer argued against this, as seeing Monson in cuffs could sway the jury against him. The judge agreed, Monson was released, and the next day he stabbed his 3rd lawyer in the neck. Slight change as this time he used a pen. So, the bad things kept happening no matter how many time people tried to stop the bad things from happening. There is no happy way to deal with someone like this, as much as we might hope. Also, in case this whole thing sounds made up (because it really does, I agree), here's a link to an article: findlaw.com/legalblogs/str… You can even go further and search the actual court records to verify. The simple fact is that there are people like this. There are also people far, far worse. Happy thoughts alone just won't cut it. Much as I do wish they could.
English
0
0
1
12
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@pepesgrandma That's a win in my book. Bravo to you! 'Doxxing' in my mind is only when you do it for malicious reasons.
English
1
0
4
51
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻
@willmcellen I’ve only doxed once in my life, and it was to save a veterans life. He lost his service dog and was vocalizing suicide. He’s still here! 🙌🏻
English
1
0
7
61
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
Depends on the contract you are on, where you work, and what is actually needed to perform the task. In reality, there are plenty of cleared personnel who may have almost no access at all to actual classified information or resources. For instance, a cleared engineer working on a classified project may only actually have access to one single piece of classified information, such as the distance their radar needs to detect a certain size object. All classified is based on Need-to-know. If it isn't directly pertinent to your job, you can't see it. It's a reportable incident if you do find a cleared person trying to access without need-to-know. For this particular dox, I would personally assume they just did a lot of open source digging of CP's posts, then spoke to other people they know to narrow down the potential list of names.
English
2
0
2
72
Will McEllen
Will McEllen@willmcellen·
@DeltaTheBravo @pepesgrandma They know what they're doing. Removing their opponent's anonymity is their only chance at defeating them since they have no valid counterargument. Or, at least not one that won't make them look like greater fools.
English
0
0
2
33