Wim Demeere
11.6K posts
@wimdemeere
Martial arts/Self-defense realist | Violence dissected | Podcast and blog https://t.co/ED35oc5PK3 | Patreon https://t.co/NPeRq4BC1o
Why in the hell do you keep walking on someone if you're not ready to throw down
Vlaamse regering bekijkt fermettetaks #Echobox=1778913297" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tijd.be/politiek-econo…
Robert Kagan recognise that the war against Iran has been lost and it will not be possible to return to the former status quo. This represents the greatest strategic defeat in US history. This is coming from Kagan, a leading neocon who co-founded PNAC, the husband of Victoria Nuland who had a key role in the coup in Kiev in 2014, and the author of "The Jungle Grows Back". In other words, this is the assessment of a neocon committed to US global dominance.
Digital spaces provide immense benefits for learning and more. But the risks for our children are real. We must build a digital world in which they can grow up free and secure. Protected by the values Europe stands for ↓ twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…
It is easy to predict when violence starts, but hard to do so when it will stop or how far it will go. This one here is a bad end point: those punches do a lot of damage. Potentially fatal or with lifelong injuries as a result. It is worth considring if such an outcome is worth whatever started this...
België gaat voor miljarden Amerikaanse raketten kopen #Echobox=1778299699" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tijd.be/politiek-econo…
NATO was always destined to be a temporary military alliance, united by a common enemy and threat during the Cold War. Once that threat disappeared with the end of the Cold War and thereafter the collapse of the Soviet Union, the main question asked in the 1990s was: What would be NATO’s new reason to exist? The answer to this question was to pursue unipolarity / collective hegemony in the post-Cold War era through NATO expansionism and military interventionism. Russia was implicitly given the ultimatum: be a compliant civilizational student or a counter-civilizational force. Russia could accept NATO's hegemonic role as a “force for good,” or it could resist, and then NATO would return to its former role of confronting Russia. The NATO-backed regime change in Ukraine—aimed at transforming the country from a Russian partner into a frontline state aligned against Russia— triggered the war in 2014. NATO thus began reverting to its former role of confronting Russia, yet it happened as the hegemonic era had come to an end. Now that the former collective hegemony has been balanced and a multipolar world has emerged, NATO has yet again lost its purpose and will disintegrate. European leaders want to restore NATO’s original purpose: containing Russia. This will fail because it is based on the fraudulent narrative that Russia wants to restore the Soviet Union, rather than balancing NATO expansionism and military interventionism. The US will, however, not return to the original purpose of NATO as the distribution of power has shifted, and will therefore not play along with the fake narratives of Europeans leaders. The US is in relative decline and cannot sustain simultaneous strategic dominance in Europe, the Middle East, East Asia, and the Western Hemisphere. The US cannot be everywhere in a multipolar world, and it will pivot to the Western Hemisphere and East Asia. A US presence in Europe consumes too many resources and pushes Russia toward China, its main rival. However, the US is happy to outsource the conflict with Russia to the Europeans. Europe remains obedient, and Russia is weakened. If Europe had rational leaders, they would have adjusted to the new international distribution of power by shutting this war down, making peace with Russia, establishing a common pan-European security architecture (35 years too late) that also saves Ukraine by removing it from the front lines of a re-divided Europe, and diversifying their economic ties to avoid excessive dependence on any one foreign power. However, Europe does not have rational leaders, and even arguing that weapons are not the path to peace or arguing in favour of diplomacy is smeared and censored as “pro-Russian” treason. Europe’s political class remains committed to Russophobic narratives and policies that intensify confrontation and prolong the conflict. The trajectory now appears increasingly clear: NATO will continue to disintegrate, and the Europeans will compensate by further escalating the war against Russia. This will happen at a time when Russia is desperate to restore its deterrence by retaliating against Europe (most predictably against Germany), while the US commitment and protection of Europe are waning. The predictable consequence is that European leaders will eventually provoke a powerful response from Russia, which will rapidly escalate to what will hopefully only be a limited nuclear strike. glenndiesen.substack.com/p/a-prediction…
Former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer: "I Have My Doubts about NATO's Survival"
