Remmy White | Author

80 posts

Remmy White | Author banner
Remmy White | Author

Remmy White | Author

@writingremmy

b o o k

Katılım Ağustos 2024
42 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You’re right that I haven’t cited the specific post — but that’s because the pattern is the problem. This isn’t about a single tweet. It’s the way you cast stones in public, then call it virtue. That matters — even if only one person sees it. You built a stage out of contempt.
English
1
0
0
14
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy And if you truly feel my posts are comtemptuous or toxic,and you show me why that's true, I'll delete them. I've literally done that before when an individual named BishopJaxi called me out for targeting him. I'm not beyond reason. Are you?
English
1
0
0
14
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
How do you become this weak?
English
1
0
0
103
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You platformed contempt and called it virtue. That deserved a public answer. I gave one. Whether it lands or not isn’t mine to control — but I won’t pretend it didn’t matter just because the crowd is small.
English
1
0
0
13
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy If you see me as damaging, try to change my mind. I haven’t insulted you. I've had conversations with individuals all over the political and religious spectrum. My values have developed and shifted with time and perspective. Feel free to have an honest discussion with me.
English
1
0
0
28
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel If you didn’t want the post challenged publicly, you shouldn’t have posted it publicly.
English
1
0
0
6
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy I doubt anyone is even going to read this far (about 20 posts into a QRT between two guys with less than 20 followers each). If there's some group I've offended, some value you feel I've betrayed, or some greater meaning you think I've missed, let's talk it over.
English
1
0
0
9
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You don't get to mock people in public and call it virtue, then ask for 'deeper' conversation once you've been called on it. That's not depth. It's damage control.
English
1
0
0
5
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy Fair enough I guess? Again, if you want a deeper conversation without all of the performative moral posturing, I keep my DMs open.
English
1
0
0
11
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel I’m not interested in polite conversations built on condescension. I’ve said what I needed to say, publicly — because that’s where the harm was done. If my words made you reflect, good. If not, I’ll leave you to your righteousness.
English
1
0
0
7
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy We can talk in DMs. But if not, that's fine as well. I really think you have the wrong udea about me, but if there are more posts you feel are purely contemptuous, feel free to share your thoughts on them. I'm more than happy to have a polite discussion.
English
1
0
0
20
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You sneer at anyone who doesn’t meet your definition of moral strength and pretend you're rebuking just one person. But your whole page is contempt dressed as conviction. You want direct? Here it is: you're not defending virtue. You're defending ego.
English
1
0
0
6
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy What poor person am I sneering at? Can you not agree that the OP in question has vile values- eg, acting like laziness is a virtue, and incest is normal? You've moved this so far away from what my original post was. Again, if you have some greater issue with me: be direct.
English
1
0
0
35
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You can dress it up however you want, but you're not calling out sin — you're performing cruelty for applause. Quoting Christ while sneering at the poor is spiritual rot. If you think that’s virtue, you’ve confused your pride for holiness.
English
1
0
0
6
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy You make it out like I'm attacking some poor impoverished soul, or an entire group of people, when all I've done is called out the weak principles of someone who is defending the "right to be lazy" and in a subsequent post- incest. If you have another issue with me, we can talk.
English
1
0
0
79
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel Calling out sin isn’t wrong. But Christ never mocked the hungry to make a point about someone else’s laziness. If your critique requires cruelty to land, maybe it’s not as righteous as you think. I’ve said my piece.
English
1
0
0
4
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy Not sure what you think about me as unmerciful. Christ also didn't hesitate to call out hypocrites. I'm not mocking anyone in need- I'm mocking one particularly repugnant individuals weak morals. You can engage with that or not, but if you have some other gripe with me- be open
English
1
0
0
11
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel If your principle is truly about virtue, then so is mine. Mocking the needy to dunk on an internet strawman isn’t righteous. You say you believe in charity — live like it. Christ didn’t demand moral purity before showing mercy.
English
1
0
0
6
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy An individual espouses "I shouldn't have to work" thinly veiled in communist rhetorical philosophy. My post attacks very seamlessly attacks their weak moral values- weak morals being a trend of theirs. You’ve taken this and decided I'm somehow against caring for those in need.
English
1
0
0
10
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You say you've got no problem with charity, but you spend all your energy mocking those who need it. You're not defending "rationality" — you're defending cruelty dressed up as discipline. Christ fed the crowds. You post about who deserves a meal.
English
1
0
0
12
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy You've plainly misunderstood myself and the OP. I have no problem with charity. I have a problem with able-bodied individuals pretending they're principally entitled to be coddled by the government: which is what the OP is in favor of. You're not defending a rational individual
Brother tweet media
English
1
0
0
8
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
@Upheivel You’re so worried someone might get a free meal that you’re willing to throw out the Gospel to stop it. Christ didn’t check resumes before He fed the crowd.
English
1
0
0
9
Brother
Brother@Upheivel·
@writingremmy The OP finishes dismally with the line: "We uphold the right to be lazy." I'm sure that's meant to be comical, but taking offense at the idea of able-bodied people needing to work to provide for themselves isn't anti-christian. Get a job, and don't whine about it.
English
1
0
0
9
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
You complain about the "male loneliness epidemic" while turning away every woman who has ever had a boyfriend before you.
English
0
0
0
29
Remmy White | Author
Remmy White | Author@writingremmy·
Truthfully, I don't understand this line of thinking at all. Men want to go around having sex with half the women they come across, but turn around and hate any woman with a history. Unable to hook up with any women they consider "valuable", men turn to porn and incelibacy.
Garbage Human@GarbageHuman24

English
1
0
1
120
Reality By Ashley
Reality By Ashley@RealityByAshley·
@hashjenni That’s the rub here. Was the moral/ethical/kind thing to do give it up? Yes. Did she legally have to? No. She will win this case even though she probably should have just given it up.
English
440
4
612
549.5K