Marcos

647 posts

Marcos

Marcos

@xBeastly93

Connecticut, USA Katılım Mart 2015
178 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@ixtly @krassenstein Yes they were not supposed to say a 600% reduction or savings because that is wrong but saying it's a 600% value is correct since 600 is 600% of 100. So they definitely fucked up with their phrasing.
English
1
0
1
13
Hector Luis Roldan
Hector Luis Roldan@ixtly·
I get what you're saying. That's not how people are taught to do math in most civilized countries. It would be a Logical Fallacy if looked at any other way. The Error: You cannot use that same "600%" figure to describe a reduction in price. In math, a percentage decrease is always calculated based on the original starting price. But again, I get what you mean ^_^
English
1
0
0
12
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
OMFG... AGAIN! RFK Jr. just doubled down on Trump's FAKE math: He claims that if a drug drops from $600 to $100 that’s a "600% savings". No you Imbecile, once again if a drug drops from $600 to $100, that’s a drop of 83.33%, not 600%. My 9-year-old son in 3rd grade understands this.
English
2.5K
6.2K
28.2K
1.2M
SPAX
SPAX@saxworthy·
@AdamSmithKY @krassenstein Worded??? His whole point was that trump’s math was “correct!”There’s a bit of a difference between 83.33% and 600%! They’re conmen. These other sycophants that know how to do math just stood there. The emperor has NO CLOTHES!
English
2
0
3
79
I like who I am on Tw1tter.
I like who I am on Tw1tter.@LostitNft·
@AdamSmithKY @krassenstein "a saving of $500 per drug issued" is correct. 600% saving mathematically incorrect. RFK Jr used the "600%" to make it sound more impressive but didn't expect so many people to understand maths. It's his own fault via his spin.
English
1
0
2
119
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@AntiRuggers @krassenstein 500% and both of those would still be misleading. You could say you get 600% more value though.
English
0
0
0
17
Anti Ruggers United
Anti Ruggers United@AntiRuggers·
@krassenstein That is a drop of 83.33%, but you can also say it’s 600% of savings or gains back in your pocket.
English
1
0
1
43
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@ixtly @krassenstein It's pretty easy to understand actually. $600 is 600% of $100. So they are giving you 600% more value.
English
1
0
0
12
Hector Luis Roldan
Hector Luis Roldan@ixtly·
@krassenstein 600% savings would mean they'd owe $3,000+? Yea I don't understand unless they're using Common Core Math and that screws up AI and regular Humans alike.... Also depending on which state was abusing the pushed system~
English
1
0
2
168
Jon Wiltshire
Jon Wiltshire@JonathanWiltsh7·
@krassenstein The starting premise is also wrong... $600 isn't a 600% increase from $100, it's a 500% increase.
English
2
0
2
115
SaraLee
SaraLee@SarAEsQMd·
@krassenstein I really don’t know. Seriously. How did they graduate colleges ? $100 goes to $600 is not 600%. It is 500%. How is it ok for them to manage billions of dollars of tax payers’ money ?
English
3
0
4
287
Andy
Andy@1984Andyes·
@krassenstein If it was the other way from 100 to 600, what would the % increase be? I I know you are right, but why do you care so much? 🤣 I'm pretty sure Trump know's.. he's just making a point with exaggeration. And i agree he should just have said 6 times lower 😂
English
2
0
1
286
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@Acydia19 @krassenstein No, that's still an 83% decrease. If a product went from 100 to 600 it's a 500% increase.
English
0
0
0
13
Chris
Chris@Acydia19·
I think they’re using multiplier terms. For example, say you 5x a stock. You then earned 500% on that trade. So if the product was $600.00 and is now $100.00. That would be a 500% decrease. Really just depends how you are feeling that day and how you want to determine the results
English
3
0
0
225
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@KalebTheSocrat Oh but it's totally possible on earth while traveling 490,000 mph?
English
0
0
0
7
Kaleb The Socrat
Kaleb The Socrat@KalebTheSocrat·
Now this picture is actually physically impossible to capture at 18,000 mph. This requires an open shutter which with any movement or disturbance will mess up the entire image. No getting past this. This is a test of our intelligence. All the stars should be streaking similar to a normal timelapse taken of Polaris in the opposite direction the “space craft” is moving.
NASA@NASA

Sky full of stars. Following a successful lunar flyby, the Artemis II astronauts captured this breathtaking photo of our galaxy, the Milky Way, on April 7, 2026.

English
675
416
2.8K
390.9K
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@hey1456011 @hitchariide Firing range overload with these rules would be so good. Definitely feel like a throwback.
English
0
0
0
22
hey
hey@hey1456011·
@hitchariide Gotta take out slums SnD and Firing Range Overload. Other than that this is goated
English
1
0
0
778
OpTic Hitch
OpTic Hitch@hitchariide·
the unc league ruleset will change call of duty forever
OpTic Hitch tweet media
English
179
164
4.8K
702.4K
Mixii
Mixii@Mixiifps·
@hitchariide Nah this is the most tst ruleset I ever seen, and if we know anything about tst tournaments it’s that there un competitive and un watchable. Throwing axes??? War machine??? Come tf on bro
English
6
0
0
2.6K
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@TomRyanOGRE2 Nothing but the last thing i played and am trying to play is crimson desert
English
0
0
0
191
Tom Ryan
Tom Ryan@TomRyanOGRE2·
super burnt out on all games lately, what is everyone playing?
English
781
3
370
191.4K
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@Maven @CauZeD__ It was an obvious play but that doesn't mean he has zero iq.
English
0
0
0
69
Clint "Maven" Evans
Clint "Maven" Evans@Maven·
I saw Simp backstage after final and instantly asked him about the corner check on Mercules during OT of the Overload. His response was “I saw Mercules plane side” …that’s all he said Crowder said he called it out instantly in comms. Simp is a fkn weirdo 🤣
English
26
28
2.7K
165.2K
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@SibDMDL If envoy costs yall at the major, pickup lurqxx. That's what somebody gotta do.
English
0
0
1
1.5K
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@xR8TEDRx @ZLaner You sure didn't miss it huh? Proud pedo defender you are.
English
0
0
0
4
R8TEDR
R8TEDR@xR8TEDRx·
@ZLaner It couldn't just stop with Nick, now he had to jump back in. Sucks not being relevant huh? Look a nick hanging off peanuts nuts. Doc carried you all and put all out there. Industry is cooked like doc said. Doc always said be yourself be authentic, guess you guys missed that part
English
1
0
0
349
Marcos
Marcos@xBeastly93·
@Victorzx900 @PsyshockGame @piques15 @ZLaner It's not criminal to hit on 17 year olds sure but is that a hill you wanna die on defending? That's weird af. Inappropriately messaging minors is weird af. You're weird af for defending it.
English
0
0
0
6
Farlans
Farlans@farlansangel·
@Outlawtorn29 @ZLaner people STILL clinging on to this even though he won the case and was found innocent is PATHETIC. most of you imbecils screaming pedo and such are NOT clean yourself either. ffs
English
12
0
67
12.8K