xHUB.AI

2.7K posts

xHUB.AI banner
xHUB.AI

xHUB.AI

@xHub_AI

dXruptive Hub AI / Business Platform

Katılım Haziran 2021
1.8K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
xHUB.AI retweetledi
dejanira
dejanira@dejanirasilveir·
🚨🚨"Inyectaron cáncer en todo el mundo" 🚨 Estos son los datos condenatorios del estudio de Pfizer, sacados a la luz por una orden de la Corte Suprema, dice el Dr. Angus Dalgleish. Dr. Angus Dalgleish, uno de los Oncólogos reconocido y más respetado en Inglaterra 🇬🇧 que ha trabajado extensamente en la investigación del cáncer y las enfermedades infecciosas: "Las de Pfizer están llenas de SV40" Literalmente te está diciendo que te inyectaron cáncer 😳 ESPELUZNANTE!! 👇
Español
87
3K
6.1K
521.1K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Some key takeaways from Sam Altman's Saturday night AMA on OpenAI's Pentagon deal - OpenAI rushed the classified agreement to ease tensions between the government and the AI industry following Anthropic’s refusal of a DoW ultimatum. Altman acknowledged the optics of rushing might look bad, but the primary goal was to stabilize the situation. - A central theme of the AMA was the belief that democratically elected governments, rather than unelected private tech executives, should hold the power to make critical, ethical decisions regarding national defense (such as responding to nuclear threats). - Contractual Terms and "Redlines": OpenAI established 3 flexible "redlines" for the technology's use, which can evolve as the tech advances. OpenAI felt comfortable with the contract language and negotiated to ensure similar terms would be offered to other AI labs. He speculated that Anthropic may have walked away because they demanded more operational control. - Instead of demanding full operational control, OpenAI established three flexible "redlines" for how their tech could be used, which can evolve as new risks emerge. A core philosophical difference highlighted by Altman is the belief that unelected tech executives should not have more power than their democratically elected government, meaning private companies should not be the ones deciding what is ethical in critical national security situations, such as responding to nuclear threats. - Crucial AI Defense Applications: Altman identified 2 major areas where AI can immediately counter significant national security threats: defending against major cyber attacks (such as threats to the electrical grid) and improving biosecurity (detecting and responding to novel pandemics). - Sam Altman also pointed out a massive contradiction in how the AI industry treats the US government. On one hand, tech leaders are constantly sounding the alarm to the Department of War. Their industry tells the government that artificial intelligence is going to be the absolute most important factor in future global conflicts, warning them that countries like China are building AI systems rapidly and the US is falling severely behind. On the other hand, when the government actually asks these tech companies for help to catch up and defend the country, companies like Anthropic refuse. They essentially tell the military, "We will not let you use their technology because we think your goals are unethical." Altman is arguing that you cannot have it both ways. It is extremely frustrating and dangerous to tell the government they are losing a critical AI arms race against foreign adversaries, but then turn around and refuse to provide them with the very tools they need to protect the country. That is why OpenAI felt compelled to step in and work with the government. They believe that if you warn the military about a major global threat, you have a responsibility to help them defend against it, rather than just calling them evil and walking away.
Rohan Paul tweet media
Sam Altman@sama

I'd like to answer questions about our work with the DoW and our thinking over the past few days. Please AMA.

English
16
17
85
41.4K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
BREAKING: Axios reports that the Pentagon has agreed to OpenAI's rules for deploying its technology. And that the conditions are similar to those put forth by Anthropic, which Trump rejected. Hmm I wonder why… —>
Brian Krassenstein tweet media
English
186
1.5K
3.9K
193.6K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
ARC Prize
ARC Prize@arcprize·
Today we're launching the ARC-AGI-3 Toolkit Your agents can now interact with environments at 2,000 FPS, locally. We're open sourcing the environment engine, 3 human-verified games (AI scores <5%), and human baseline scores. ARC-AGI-3 launches March 25, 2026.
ARC Prize tweet media
English
16
71
448
189.9K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Teng Yan · Chain of Thought AI
For 20+ years, software ate the world. Now, AI Agents are eating software. A massive signal just came out of China that most people missed: Bairong (a publicly listed enterprise giant) started selling "AI Workers". they call it Results-as-a-Service (RaaS). 🧵 instead of buying "seats," enterprises now "hire" agents. each agent comes with a job description, KPIs, and revenue targets. if performance drops, the bill drops. if the agent improves, it earns more. Bairong runs this through "Results Cloud". it’s essentially an HR system for machines. they’ve already deployed agents across: Sales & Customer Service + Recruitment (hiring cycles cut from 30 days to 2) + Legal & Tax (handling 90% of high-frequency work) this is where the SaaS model starts to crack. Traditional SaaS: You pay upfront. You carry the risk. Agentic Era: You pay for outcomes. The vendor carries the risk. this shift is being accelerated by the collapse of build costs. I came across this post by @martinald recently that agentic coding has slashed internal build costs by ~90%. when it's this cheap to build exactly what you need, the "Buy" in "Build vs Buy" dies. IMO, Vendors who are not able to price against results will struggle. the "Seat" is dead. the "Outcome" is everything. 🤖📈
Teng Yan · Chain of Thought AI tweet media
English
219
590
3.3K
406.7K
Plácido Doménech Espí
Plácido Doménech Espí@PlacidoDomenech·
💣YA DISPONIBLE! La segunda xTALKS.AI PREMIUM con ... 🧠David Vivancos @VivancosDavid@xhub_ai Award 2025 | Talent X ⭐⭐@xhub_ai Award 2025 | xTALKS.AI Gold ⭐Autor de libros como Artificracia o el nuevo Recursos Humanicos. ⭐Co-Autor de Neuraxon y colaborador habitual de @xhub_ai 🤯Una charla de 3 horas que te va a explotar la cabeza... ▶️Youtube : youtu.be/Mzap7oSYjwo?si… 🎧Podcast : En breve! ❤️‍🔥Dadle amor. Compartir. No os lo perdáis.... no va a dejar indiferente. Esperamos vuestro feedback.
YouTube video
YouTube
Plácido Doménech Espí tweet media
Español
2
5
11
2.2K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
David Vivancos - e/acc
David Vivancos - e/acc@VivancosDavid·
[ENG] Humbled to receive yestarday the #XTalent Award 2025 @xHub_AI , and also share the Gold #XTalks Award with @josesanchezhb with the #Artificracy Talk and the #Neuraxon @_Qubic_ Talk. [ESP] Un honor recibir el premio XTalent 2025 de #XHUBAI y compartir el premio Gold XTalk con Dr. José Sanchez. Muchas gracias a @PlacidoDomenech @ellie_xifra y a toda la comunidad de habla hispana de #IA más importante que durante los últimos 5 años divulga los avances reales de IA y personas que la crean, nada de #SupuestosExpertosIA o vendecursos sin criterio, ni base, ni autoridad. La entrega de premios aqui: youtube.com/watch?v=r695UE… La XTalk de Neuraxon aquí youtube.com/watch?v=jRNtq9… La XTalk de Artificracia aquí youtube.com/watch?v=IjMC8Q… Enhorabuena también al resto de premiados como Juan J. Merelo Emilio Soria-Olivas Covadonga Ordóñez García Jesus Granero Eduardo Cano Álvaro Gonzalo Guedán Jose Mussach Gomez Ignasi Alcalde Antonio Flores Xavier Mitjana Jordi Linares, PhD A por un gran 2026! que promete
YouTube video
YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
David Vivancos - e/acc tweet mediaDavid Vivancos - e/acc tweet media
English
14
33
150
10.5K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Uza
Uza@felurian76·
Me sabe mal por la Rosalía, pero no tiene nada que hacer contra el nuevo exitazo de Leticia Sabater 🤣🤣🤣 Entero no me cabe, ya lo buscáis vosotros , si eso
Español
167
208
1K
137.9K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
TestingCatalog News 🗞
TestingCatalog News 🗞@testingcatalog·
BREAKING 🚨: Google is working on multi-agent systems to help you refine ideas with tournament-like evaluation. Each run takes around 40 minutes and brings you 100 detailed ideas on a given research topic. 2 new multi-agents are being developed for Gemini Enterprise: - Idea Generation - "Create a multi-agent innovation session" - Co-Scientist - "Drive novel scientific discovery with Co-Scientist" Co-Scientist 3-step workflow 👀 - Tell Co-Scientist what you plan to research, point it to relevant data, and set your evaluation criteria. - A team of agents will generate ideas on your topic using their available data - The agents will evaluate the ideas against your criteria and rank them, tournament-style Google is not only automating research but also preparing a product that will enable others to do so. This is the next level 🤯
English
55
193
1.8K
569.4K
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Kimi.ai
Kimi.ai@Kimi_Moonshot·
🚀 Hello, Kimi K2 Thinking! The Open-Source Thinking Agent Model is here. 🔹 SOTA on HLE (44.9%) and BrowseComp (60.2%) 🔹 Executes up to 200 – 300 sequential tool calls without human interference 🔹 Excels in reasoning, agentic search, and coding 🔹 256K context window Built as a thinking agent, K2 Thinking marks our latest efforts in test-time scaling — scaling both thinking tokens and tool-calling turns. K2 Thinking is now live on kimi.com in chat mode, with full agentic mode coming soon. It is also accessible via API. 🔌 API is live: platform.moonshot.ai 🔗 Tech blog: moonshotai.github.io/Kimi-K2/thinki… 🔗 Weights & code: huggingface.co/moonshotai
Kimi.ai tweet media
English
580
1.5K
9.7K
4.8M
xHUB.AI retweetledi
alphaXiv
alphaXiv@askalphaxiv·
Introducing the Illustrated Transformer in 3D 🚀 Fly through LLaMA like never before. See every tensor and operation in motion. Click any component to reveal the exact lines of code that run it. A new way to learn and teach LLMs. Try it out in the link below 👇
English
19
145
786
50.3K
CyberDog
CyberDog@CyberDkDog·
@PlacidoDomenech Placido, yo creo que faltan etiquetas o no se estan usando adecuadamente para hablar de expertos. Te sigo activamente y tengo claro que hay una diferencia muy grande entre experto en IA y usuario avanzado/formador de LLM y herramientas de generación. No es lo mismo.
Español
1
0
3
23
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Plácido Doménech Espí
Plácido Doménech Espí@PlacidoDomenech·
Venga voy a soltar algo que pocos dicen... ¿Por qué sale siempre como experto de AI casi siempre el / los mismo/s? No hay cientos de voces con talento para opinar. Expertos reales. ¿No vende humos, influencers o divulgadores? Creéis que es casualidad? Que no hay una estrategia? NO. Vivimos ya en la Venezuela.AI también.... Aplaudid a los expertos aunque no lo sean. Es la voz del poder. @xhub_ai está y estará fuera de toda esa manipulación. Somos y seremos libres para expresarnos y opinar. A riesgo de lo que ya sabéis.
Español
1
2
7
616
xHUB.AI retweetledi
Plácido Doménech Espí
Plácido Doménech Espí@PlacidoDomenech·
🏰A mi los Medievos! 😂Tranquilos, un poco de humor, respirad, va a ocurrir, no va a depender de lo que tu quieres o te guste. Tu podrás seguir haciendo y teniendo lo que quieras. Como hasta ahora? ❌Pero podrás elegir ... 💞DAME UN GRRRRRRR.AI! El martes 21 un xDEBATE.AI en @xhub_ai on fire! 🔥
Plácido Doménech Espí tweet media
Español
0
1
3
330