Fengquan He

@jacksonhinkle 同样是增加消费者的支出，特朗普更聪明，他使用加关税的办法，这样钱就进了美国政府的口袋。欧洲人使用向第三方国家购买的方法，钱会进入中间商的口袋。何必如此。

🇪🇺🇨🇳 The EU is forcing companies to buy components from non-Chinese suppliers, in an attempt to distance itself from China's industry.

@clashreport 谁是那个外国势力？

Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te: Taiwan's future cannot be decided by foreign forces, nor can it be held hostage by fear, division, or short-term interests.

@nexta_tv 一个正规的媒体账号，天天搞这些挑拨离间的话题，有意义吗？假设一周内只有这两位高级别官员可以安排时间迎接来客，难道副主席不是最合适的人选吗？在当前形势下，外交部长领导的外交官员，和特朗普总统领导的官员唇枪舌战激烈争论。难道你觉得这种情况下外交部长更适合迎接特朗普总统？见面不尴尬吗？

Putin to Xi Jinping: "Our cooperation in foreign policy affairs is one of the main stabilizing factors on the international stage. In the current tense situation on the international stage, our close coordination is especially needed". Attention from journalists was drawn to the level of the reception ceremony for the Russian dictator. Putin was met at the airport by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi — a member of the Politburo of the CCP, which is considered a sign of special respect in Chinese diplomatic protocol. At the same time, during Donald Trump’s recent visit, he was received by a less influential Chinese official who is not a member of the Politburo. Analysts believe this may indicate that Beijing is emphasizing the importance of its relations with Moscow. Putin’s press secretary Peskov said the following: “There is a point in comparing substance. It is not always easy to compare it, because not everything is on the surface. But the main value is precisely in the substance, not in ceremonial attributes. Although, of course, for such countries, for Eastern countries — and we are also partly an Eastern country — ceremonial elements also carry special significance.” Putin’s visit to China will last two days. The Russian delegation includes ministers, deputy prime ministers, Central Bank head Elvira Nabiullina, as well as heads of major state companies and banks.

@dpinsen @BrianMcDonaldIE 长期的稳定合约，不受市场波动影响。它是真实的直接交易，没有人可以从这里制造价格波动进行短期买进卖出获利。有时候会高出国际市场很多。比如上一次国际原油价格很低的时候，中国人也会对此提出强烈质疑，但通常不会影响他们的谈判。

@BrianMcDonaldIE Is the price for China not set by a market?

Reuters reports that the price of Russian pipeline gas for China could fall to its lowest level since 2021, with supplies via the Power of Siberia pipeline projected at around $224 per thousand cubic metres in 2027. According to Russia’s Economy Ministry forecasts, that would be roughly 14% lower than this year’s level and around a third cheaper than the price paid by Gazprom’s other foreign customers.

@RealMAGAtard @clashreport 典型的海洋文明思维，只要我比你强大，我就会且一定会掠夺你。从来不相信有公平的和平的合作。尝试考虑一下另一种合作模式吧，抛弃你的成见，合作共赢，在不久的将来，我们就可以看到，泰国和越南的产品通过高铁运输，72小时内到达俄罗斯，我们拭目以待，一切都在往好的方向发展。

@clashreport Xi saying "equality" with Russia proves he doesn't mean anything he says. China absolutely dwarfs Russia. Militarily, financially, socially. Xi just says whatever he needs to in order to get what he wants. He just played Trump and Putin. Not bad.

Xi to Putin: China and Russia have persisted in developing a comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era on the basis of equality, mutual respect, good faith, and win-win cooperation. The political mutual trust between our two countries has continuously deepened. Cooperation in economy and trade, investment, energy, science and technology, culture and at the local level has been steadily moving forward. People-to-people bonds have become stronger. China-Russia relations have entered a new stage with greater accomplishments and faster development. It is a strategic choice made by President Putin and me to unswervingly promote the long-term, healthy, stable, and high-quality development of China-Russia relations, in view of the fundamental interests of both countries and the general trend of world development.

@WiseInvestorY @wccftech 正是因为需求越来越大，才有动力去投资。AI芯片用政策限制，内存和存储芯片用价格限制，中国尝试到了苦头，别无选择需要想办法。这是一个机会，DDR5价格在这次涨价后将被重新锚定。以前16G内存零售75美元甚至更低，中国企业想加入，竞争力为0，如果重新锚定到150美元左右，则情况会更有利。

@wccftech Thats a joke ..firstly china needs 20 months to just build a factory ..another 18 month to make it function and still deal with export restrictions from other countries on tooling and data center demand is only gonna go up

Ex-Samsung chip boss says heavy investment by China in the memory market could crush the 414% DDR5 price spike within a year. 🔗 wccf.tech/1kg52

@visionergeo 如果俄罗斯有这种能力，为什么不把无人机全部引导到正面战场的对手那里？

‼️🇷🇺🇪🇪🇷🇴 BREAKING | Escalation between NATO and Russia is reaching unprecedented scales, raising the risks of a potential military confrontation. ​Today, a Romanian Air Force F-16 based in Lithuania shot down a Ukrainian drone in Estonian airspace. The drone's trajectory had been altered and redirected toward Estonia by Russian forces using electronic warfare (EW) systems. ​Ukraine officially denies using the airspace of the Baltic states, noting that Russia is deliberately and provocatively altering the targets of Ukrainian drones to generate certain propaganda threats.

@OopsGuess 欧美人的思维定势。总是在想别人害怕他什么，总是在想怎么破坏别人的商业或者金融或者土地。他们不思考别人喜欢他们什么，不思考怎么平等和平的获得双方的共同利益。

Kaja Kallas thinks the U.S., China and Russia all fear a “united Europe.” LMAO... People see a Europe that cannot decide what it wants to be. Militarily dependent on America. Industrially dependent on China. Politically addicted to hating Russia. Emotionally trapped in the museum of its former greatness. And somehow Brussels still thinks the world is sitting around trembling at the idea of “European unity.” Please. A bloc that needs Washington for security, China for supply chains, and Russia as a permanent enemy to hold itself together is not an equal power. It is a committee with nostalgia. Europe keeps talking as if this were still the 17th century, when paperwork, moral lectures, and old imperial memory could pass for power. But this is the 21st century. Power is energy. Power is manufacturing. Power is logistics. Power is technology. Power is the ability to act without asking permission. Europe has regulations, speeches, and anxiety. That is not geopolitical strength, it is just civilizational self-pity with a press office.

@TheKanehB 美国要监控全世界啊，这又不是什么秘密。

China’s population is 1.4B people, America has 320m people. China has been under a surveillance state for decades- 600M surveillance cameras, they can identify citizens w facial recognition w a 98.5% accuracy and they record every move by their citizens Yet China only has 450 data centers What data is the US gathering that would justify the US to need 5,000 data centers - 15x what China has, with only a quarter of the population?

@War_Radar2 一个国家长期不发动战争，反而成了它的弱点。大概只有人类这种自以为是的愚蠢生物，才会有这样的思维模式。

‼️🇺🇸🇨🇳🇹🇼 ROBERT GATES: CHINA MAY NOT BE READY FOR WAR Former U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says Beijing faces major obstacles if it tries to invade Taiwan: • China does not want to destroy the semiconductor factories it hopes to capture. • No serving Chinese general or admiral has real combat experience. • China’s last war in 1979 ended with heavy losses against Vietnam. • Xi Jinping’s last two defense ministers were removed amid corruption scandals. Gates’ warning: China’s biggest weakness may be its own military leadership.

@riazulrahil @Megatron_ron 在过去几十年里，有很多美国人也关注了非洲的贫穷，呼吁帮助他们，带着摄影师去非洲拍摄了很多照片，展现非洲人民的困境，给非洲小孩发放糖果，然后回到美国，写一本非常感人的书，然后，开始卖书。但是，这无法从根本上解决温饱问题。

NEW: 🇨🇳🇺🇸 Trump confirmed today that China is refusing to buy NVIDIA chips because they are developing their own This once again confirms that the US has lost the main bargaining card with China which I wrote about it yesterday. TRUMP: “They have (Nvidia) a much higher level than H200.China needs it and yeah it came up. They choose not to buy because they want to develop their own. I think something could happen on that.”

@riazulrahil @Megatron_ron 一个国家在本土解决了温饱问题，就可以稳定的发展。而带去这些改变的，只是一些普通的中国个体户或者小企业主。他们日复一日年复一年的在那里和非洲人一起生活。

@riazulrahil @Megatron_ron 完全在传授和复制40年前中国脱贫之路，在那里不仅带去了农作物种植，更重要的是带去了勤劳的种子，我敢保证，很快他们就会学会，一旦有人通过勤劳过上了更好的生活，就会有更多的非洲人放弃懒惰的思维，和当年的中国人一样，开始尝试通过更努力的工作，在本土解决温饱问题，

@riazulrahil @Megatron_ron 美国的大企业不喜欢低利润的项目。中国的农民去非洲，带领当地的农民种地，开设小作坊，建小房子，和当地人一起生活，和员工吵架，谈判工资，一起逛街，一起制作食物。每年观察农作物，推测当地的土壤适合种植何种作物，并从中国运送种子过去进行测试。他们只是获取微薄的利润。

@jpnexpert @MarioNawfal 你说的完全正确，但是和我说的并不相驳。所有存在的事物都有它的意义，不论我是否认可它的本质。所有的事物都会经历繁荣和黯淡的交替轮回，不论是房地产还是股票，或者郁金香。我们不用故意去摧毁任何事物，只是在时代来临时迎接它的变化，并照顾好自己。

You are totally wrong on this. Whether it is gold, real estate, the stock market, fiat currency, or even cryptocurrency, they all work in broadly similar ways—driven by confidence, liquidity, demand, and future expectations. Which of these assets is your preferred one? And which of them do you think should be deliberately destroyed in value? Most people would oppose wealth destruction when it affects the assets they personally own or benefit from.

🇨🇳🇺🇸 People still talk like the world is stuck in the 1990s where America builds everything, controls everything, and everyone else just follows. That world is changing fast. China didn’t suddenly wake up one day and replace the U.S. It spent the last 20 years building nonstop while most Western countries got distracted by politics, financial bubbles, and endless debates. Take shipbuilding. China now has around 230x the shipbuilding capacity of the U.S. In 2024 alone, China built more than 1,000 commercial vessels. America built 8. Now look at cars. China produced around 31 million vehicles last year, more than the U.S. and Japan combined. In just a few years, its car exports exploded from around 700,000 to 5.5 million. Let’s talk about trade. China is now a top-3 trading partner for roughly 157 countries. Whether Washington likes it or not, a massive part of global commerce now runs through Beijing. And then there’s ports. 7 of the world’s 10 busiest container ports are Chinese. Global trade literally depends on infrastructure China controls or heavily influences. Now 5G. China rolled it out earlier and at a scale most Western countries couldn’t match. America’s response later shifted toward chip bans and export controls, which honestly looked like Washington realizing the manufacturing lead was already slipping away. And high-speed rail might be the clearest example of all. China has more than 50,000 km operational. The U.S. still debates projects for years before construction even begins. But this isn’t some “China already won” story either. America still dominates militarily. The dollar still runs global finance. U.S. alliances still stretch across the planet. Silicon Valley still shapes global tech. And China has real problems too. Debt. Demographics. A slowing property market. A state-driven economy with hidden pressure points everywhere. Still, the bigger shift is impossible to ignore now. China kept building. America kept assuming the gap would never close. That assumption may have been the real turning point. Source: USNI, OICA, Visual Capitalist, Xinhua, China General Administration of Customs.

@ianbremmer @gzeromedia 如果您真的看了原话，就不会这样说。原话是大意是：双方能否避免所谓的修昔底德陷阱。这是一个提问，同时也是表达中国认为可以避免并且会为之努力的意愿。实际上和您最后描述的意思相同。

xi wants to frame the world as a “thucydides trap.” i don’t think that’s right. this is a g-zero world, not an inevitable us-china war. @gzeromedia

@jpnexpert @MarioNawfal 股市就是一个赌场，一个人赚钱就有另一个人亏损。为投机者提供舞台，为操纵者获得利益。除此之外毫无用处，上一分钟买进下一分钟卖出的资金流对实体企业毫无用处。美国的股市之所以繁荣，几乎所有人在这里获利，依赖于军事和金融的霸主地位，它可以在宏观角度向全世界吸取新鲜财富进行填充。

The biggest mistake China made was copying Japan in unnecessarily destroying real estate and stock market wealth. Japan destroyed trillions of dollars in generational wealth by labeling a well-deserved period of rapid growth as a “bubble” and then crushing it through sudden interest rate hikes, strict lending restrictions, and strong negative narratives against fast growth. Land prices at prime locations in what was then the hottest property market in the world had increased only around 3–5 times. Many other markets experienced much larger increases—some even more than 30 times—and still eventually stabilized at higher levels, making large sections of their populations far more prosperous.

@mhm_ata 在中文语境下，习近平主席的讲话没有任何羞辱的意思。另外，修昔底德陷阱中没有任何衰落大国的描述，相反，守成的斯巴达依然如日中天，并且战胜了雅典，但经过战争，雅典和斯巴达都没落了，为旁观的马其顿王国提供了绝佳机会，这才是需要注意的。同时，不能忘记提防挑拨离间的科林斯。

Chinese President #Xi Jinping delivered a calculated but unmistakably clear warning to Trump during their meeting: #Taiwan is not merely a political dispute for Beijing — it is a military #red_line tied directly to China’s territorial integrity and national security. The message was obvious: the United States can no longer open multiple fronts against major powers at the same time and expect to walk away without paying a price. Xi Jinping’s remarks about “managing crises and preventing escalation” carried a much deeper meaning. It was a direct signal regarding Washington’s aggressive policies toward #Iran and its continued strategy of containing China. Beijing has watched closely as the United States, despite costly strategic setbacks and failures against Iran, continues to rely on pressure, threats, and military adventurism. But this time, the equation is different. China made it clear to #Washington that if the U.S. continues escalating against Iran, destabilizing the region, while simultaneously expanding the military buildup and arming Taiwan, it will no longer be dealing with a limited conflict or a manageable crisis. The risk of direct confrontation with China will grow significantly. This is where the Thucydides Trap becomes real: the moment a declining power fails to recognize its own limits and, by opening multiple fronts at once, pushes itself into a path that accelerates the #collapse of its own hegemony. Beijing’s message was humiliating for Washington, yet unmistakably clear: The era in which America could dictate terms to the entire world is coming to an end. Taiwan is China’s red line, and Iran has already shown that the age of #cost_free American #wars is over.

@hidflect @thesiriusreport 我觉得很好，任何事情都需要逐渐推进，但是本次访问完成了从0-1的艰难步骤，这在任何项目中都是最难的。如果之后能保持接触，政商两界的重要人物就会逐渐熟悉并找到合作契机。我承认他们都是优秀的精英，但是也不可能初次见面，吃了一个晚餐就决定上百亿美元的订单。

@thesiriusreport I'm shocked what an embarrassment Trump's trip to China was. Normally these things are curated down to the moment and would never proceed without guaranteed, stage managed triumphs all round. But he went there with all those CEO's like it was a Friday night dinner.

Putin is not visiting Beijing to meet Xi to discuss what was said between Trump and Xi. That is already well understood. As ever when it comes to all matters, China and Russia are joined at the hip. Particularly when it comes to foreign policy. People appear to have forgotten that Lavrov visited China in mid April. That is the purpose of the visit by Putin. There are huge developments going on between the two nations. People have also forgotten that Araghchi visited both China and Russia recently. There is nothing for Xi and Putin to discuss with respect to both Iran and also Taiwan. In terms of bilateral trade between the US and China, Russia has no need to show any interest in that.

@defense_civil25 哈哈哈😂，马斯克和黄仁勋都吃了很多中国食物，他们不怕吗？

🚨Update: President Trump did NOT eat any Chinese made food during his visit. The White House took its own chefs and its own food for President Trump to eat. It’s far too dangerous to eat Chinese made food due to probability of poisoning and nano-tech which China might use against Trump and the US!