Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Hey Guys ,
My old X got suspended for any reason .
This is my new X account .
Sharing the plays i buy here :
t.me/UnemployedPlays
So far we are above 85% Win rate .
Lets Win !
English
Unemployed
13 posts
Unemployed
@xxUnemployed
Fully unemployed into crypto https://t.co/DRI9aX8k3G
Alpha Land Katılım Nisan 2026
19 Takip Edilen400 Takipçiler
Waiting till Moonshot , PF , OKX etc etc will post Chair memes...
🪑🪑🪑
English
I have to ask - what’s the actual benefit of the cashback feature that Pump.fun introduced?
Do you really prefer earning an extra 0.025 SOL from this almost useless feature, instead of letting the fees go to the dev so they can actually use them for DEX listings, boosts, and try to push the coin as far as possible? The dev has a real incentive to grow the project since they profit from it. On top of that, it would motivate people to do CTOs on good coins and actually run them, since the team could earn fees from it.
And yes, not all devs paid for DEX listings and boosts even when they were getting fees - but most of them did. And even if a coin doesn’t run to a high market cap, I still think devs deserve to receive the fees just for the effort they put in - finding a narrative (which, by the way, you’re the ones profiting from), creating the art, being active in the community and doing everything right so that everyone can make money - both the traders and the dev.
What’s actually happening right now is that devs aren’t getting fees, so they end up doing aggressive bundles that crash the chart at 20–25K or even earlier. In the end, you’re the ones losing money - all for a cashback that earns you less than $1.
And nobody is paying for DEX listings or boosts, even for coins that reach 100–150K MC, because there’s no incentive - devs don’t earn anything from that market cap, and holders aren’t paying for it either.
I think it’s time to go back to the old method - launching without cashback.
What do you think?
English