History Fc

@nocontextnvncbl Full mask mark doesn’t even seem that bad, considering he’s the only that might survive out of them

@FoolyCOD Surely the easiest casting is literally just the modern Price since he does stuff like this anyway

FUCK YEAH IM DEFINITELY NOT WATCHING THIS SHIT🔥🔥🔥

@Danny39098934 @Harrymwy7 Cope

@Harrymwy7 Would take up too much data.

Another daft cunt with a blue tick. No elbow used. Wasn't a foul. You do realise it's a contact sport. Shall we build a montage of all the fouls, diving cheating that Man U players do? No? Didn't think so.

@xGPhilosophy Embarrassing holy fuck

Arsenal (0.78) 0-0 (0.33) Sporting CP

@UtdDistrict Oh noooo he insulted the grown men getting paid to do their job (badly) how mean of him 💔💔💔

🚨 | In the FA’s written reasons for Harry Maguire’s suspension, fourth official Matt Donohue said Maguire had approached him and shouted: “You’re a joke. You’re all a f—ing joke.” Maguire, however, in his statement contended that he said “something along the lines of ‘it is a f—ing joke'” and was “certain” he did not call any match official a joke. Donohue later admitted that there is a possibility he ‘misheard or mis-recollected’ Maguire saying “You’re a joke” but remembered the #mufc player saying “You’re all a f—ing joke” with clarity and he believed that was aimed at the collective group of officials.

*landing on the Halo for the first time* No, it's fine, I just didn't expect it to be Japanese.

@ANVL007 @FPLfrasier Or they just aren’t pussies like half the league

@FPLfrasier Dalot had his throat grabbed and didnt go down Dorgu got stamped and didnt feel a thing Lack of awareness from these players at times is ridiculous

You can complain about Gabriel play acting. But, if he was in place of Yoro he would have forced VAR to properly look at that DCL violent attack. DCL would have been sent off.

@mickyjohnsonvox @jacobdyer96 @SkySportsPL @Carra23 I agree but the ref made a decision and Var decided otherwise

@yanited2005_fc @jacobdyer96 @SkySportsPL @Carra23 The city one above is worse without a doubt, but Martinez put himself in that situation and gave the refs a decision to make.

"I think everybody in the game is thinking that is not a red card, behave yourself" @Carra23 discusses Lisandro Martínez's red card against Leeds 🟥

@mickyjohnsonvox @jacobdyer96 @SkySportsPL @Carra23 It’s shocking because there is very little force and he probably tried to grab his shirt but Calvert Lewin just happens to be one of like 10 players with a ponytail, Martinez is stupid for grabbing in the first place but Var re-refereed for no reason at all

@yanited2005_fc @jacobdyer96 @SkySportsPL @Carra23 100% Red helped you out. I didn’t think we’d get anything from it tonight. We’ve had some appauling decisions against us this year, I don’t think it’s as shocking decision like some of your fans are saying though.

@israel_ajoje They are basically the Mafia, make mistakes and no one is allowed to complain about it

Referees make two kinds of mistakes. The kind that gets talked about and the kind that gets buried. Today there was one of each. Lisandro Martinez was sent off for pulling Calvert-Lewin's hair. IFAB Law 12 explicitly states that a player must be sent off for making a clear action to pull the hair of an opponent with force. The referee saw force and the law gave him no alternative. That decision has a legal basis whether you agree with the assessment or not. Then there is the first goal Leeds scored today. Okafor fouled Leny Yoro before his header that led to the opener. That foul was not called and the goal stood. Bruno Fernandes stood in front of Sky Sports cameras afterwards and said he could not talk about the referee or he would get into big trouble. He did not need to say anything else. The smile said the rest. Both things can be true simultaneously. The red card was legally defensible. The uncalled foul was not. United have a genuine grievance on one count and a harder argument on the other. Knowing which is which matters. The reason Bruno Fernandes unfortunately could not speak freely is FA Rule E3. It prohibits any player, manager or club official from making post-match comments that imply bias, question the integrity of a match official, or bring the game into disrepute. It is a serious offence under the FA Rukes. Marco Silva was fined £80,000 under FA Rule E3 for post-match comments implying bias against a referee following a Premier League match in December 2023. José Mourinho was fined £50,000 and handed a suspended stadium ban for suggesting a referee was afraid to give a penalty. The rule exists, in theory, to protect referees from reputational damage and to maintain the integrity of officiating. In practice it means that the people with the most direct experience of refereeing decisions, the players and managers on the pitch, are the ones legally prevented from discussing them publicly. Everyone else, pundits, journalists, fans, can say exactly what they think. The participant who lived it cannot. That tension is not incidental to football's relationship with accountability. It is central to it. Referees do not have perfect games. Neither do players. The difference is that players face consequences for their errors in real time. Referees do not and players can't complain. How fair exactly is that? My name is Ajoje. I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I write on the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow if you want to read more posts like this.

@mickyjohnsonvox @SkySportsPL @Carra23 I agree but now both of our first choice defenders are out for 2-3 games because of shitty decisions

@yanited2005_fc @SkySportsPL @Carra23 Should have been here too as per rule book. Even if it’s a bollox rule. It helped you as you were getting battered before the red.

@mickyjohnsonvox @jacobdyer96 @SkySportsPL @Carra23 It’s inconsistent that’s why, this wasn’t given and it’s the SAME ref and MORE force, Leeds deserved to win by like 3 goals and if anything the red card nearly cost them the game because we better after it

@jacobdyer96 @yanited2005_fc @SkySportsPL @Carra23 I agree it’s not good for the game but the rules were followed. I don’t see how Carrick can say that’s “one of the worst decisions” we’ve had bad decisions in the past 5 games via VAR. Tbf it helped Man United.

@Frank7051964332 @Bobbobaggins88 @Rory_Talks_Ball Because it was headed away ffs, watch the clip it’s not that hard

@yanited2005_fc @Bobbobaggins88 @Rory_Talks_Ball Is that why the ball is in view on one shot but not the other?

Do I think that should be a red? No Is Martinez silly considering how many hair pull red cards we’ve seen? Yes

@mickyjohnsonvox @SkySportsPL @Carra23 Aka he was just listening to Var in his ear and wanted to sound unbiased and why weren’t they inforced here then?

@yanited2005_fc @SkySportsPL @Carra23 Tbf he knows the rules that’s why.

@Frank7051964332 @Bobbobaggins88 @Rory_Talks_Ball You’ve obviously not watched the game and are judging it on screenshots, both were 50/50s for the ball

@Bobbobaggins88 @Rory_Talks_Ball Probably the one where they weren’t going for the ball

@mjcolclough @saundzo They grabbed each other lol

@yanited2005_fc @saundzo Hair pull is a 50/50 apparently

Whether it’s soft or not, you obviously cannot do this?

@saundzo Same ref but no foul here like wtf

@yanited2005_fc VAR is piss isn’t it

@ManUnitedZone @StevenRailston We won’t tho, if we appeal and “they” think it’s the right decision he could get a 4-5 game suspension instead

🚨 Manchester United are considering appealing the decision to send Martinez off. The defender is facing a three-match suspension for 'violent conduct'. [via @StevenRailston]

@ellis_platten @OkidokieMate @rioferdy5 @FA_PGMOL Can’t wait for it to happen to yous and see what you say then lol

@OkidokieMate @rioferdy5 @FA_PGMOL Sorry you seem to be mistaking me for PGMOL

Explain @FA_PGMOL