yee

WIP mature era 🍎 #mjart #mj #MichaelJackson

I don't know how he did it seriously

네버랜드에 아픈아이들 초대해서 추억 만들어주던 마이클 :(((( “아이가 얼마나 심하게 아프더라도, 마이클은 아이가 머무는 동안은 어떻게든 밝고 활기찬 모습을 유지하곤 했다. 그는 그렇게 강인한 사람이었다. 하지만 때로는 아이가 떠나고 나면, 마이클은 참아왔던 눈물을 쏟아내곤 했다.”

마잭이 소니 지분 50퍼 소유주였던거 권력 미친것같음 그거때매 많은 시련과 음해를 겪은 것 같지만..🥲 지켜내려고 최선을 다했고 잘 버텼어

님들 여기서 포인트는 저 물이 500미리가 아니란 말임니다 너무 한손에 가볍게 들길래 500짜리인줄 알았음

🕺🕺

No one does it like him

In 1993, Michael Jackson wrote a heartfelt introduction to a family cookbook, ‘Pigtails and Frog Legs’ by Neiman Marcus. “Remember when you were little and your mother made a pie for you? When she cut a slice and put it on your plate, she was giving you a bit of herself, in the form of her love. She made you feel safe and wanted.” You don’t write words like these unless that compassion genuinely comes from within ❤️

리사한테 쪽지 남기면서 향수 향기 맡아보라고 smell here 적어둔거봐 진짜 낭만 아티스트같고그럼 “리사 난 정말 이 휴식이 필요해 ​4일 동안이나 잠을 못 잤어 전화기랑 비즈니스 사람들로부터 좀 떨어져 있어야겠어 당신에게 미쳐있어(ㅈㄴ사랑한다는뜻)”

마이클잭슨을 사랑한뒤로 의식적으로 오렌지쥬스를 먹게됨

@GroovyDaij MJ's security said:

Love him so much but I really wanna know why he didn’t pick up the social cues that Bashir didn’t like him, or maybe he had so much confidence in the fact that he his own camera crew. Michael never lacked street smarts to me, per say, but I wanna know the thought process

"As soon as their price went up to $500,000, the hand went inside the pants.“ Still the best article ever written about the first extortion case is Mary Fischer‘s Was Michael Jackson framed? Here‘s a link to the pdf version allmystery.de/dateien/59922,…

And Ron Zonen married the witness. Who attended the wedding? 👉Diane Dimond, one of the participants in that SHIT "documentary", a journalist who serially defamed Michael Jackson, whom he sued decades ago. 👉And the Arvizo brothers, Michael's accusers in the 2005 trial. 🤬

My story about why my friends and I were on the witness list for the defense during the 2005 trial. I’m so sick of the MJ slander year after year. 🤬 Please share. These videos, from people that were actually there, are the most impactful videos, but never get the traction they deserve.

ARVIZO‘S SERIAL SCAM & LAWSUITS HISTORY : against JC Penny, Chris Tucker, George Lopez, and Jay Leno, bus company and ex-husband (All proved in the court) AND MANAGER DIETER EXPLAINED WHAT HAPPENED IN HIS BOOK :I knew that this was going to be too much, even for Michael. She tried to make him the father of her children, to force him to become her life-partner, and that was a step too far for Michael. Michael called me in for a private conversation, which I already knew was coming because Michael avoided any conversation where there might be conflict. "You know what, Dieter, you have to do something..." Shortly after that, I spoke with Janet and reminded her that the stay at Neverland was a vacation. All vacations must eventually come to an end, and that time had now come. She should please take herself and her children home. Her face became red, fury raged in her eyes, which had narrowed to menacing slits, and notched wrinkles appeared on her temples. She freaked out completely, began screaming and crying, "You're putting a wedge between Michael and my family. I won't let that happen. You will regret it!" I tried to make it clear that I had already talked to lawyers, who advised that her children desperately needed a regular life. Apart from that, they had to go back to school. Otherwise, there was a danger that Michael could get into some serious problems. She said that Michael could buy her and the children an apartment nearby. I replied vaguely, "Maybe that could be discussed at a later time." After the family climbed into the car filled with shopping bags, Michael's staff took them back to LA, to Janet's fiancé, whose last name by pure chance was also Jackson. (Janet later married him and took his last name). I was relieved. Nevertheless, I had a strange feeling. Something told me that we would hear from Janet Ventura-Arvizo again. After the family climbed into the car filled with shopping bags, Michael's staff took them back to LA, to Janet's fiancé, whose last name by pure chance was also Jackson. (Janet later married him and took his last name). I was relieved. Nevertheless, I had a strange feeling. Something told me that we would hear from Janet Ventura-Arvizo again. In the next few weeks, there were rumors that Janet Ventura-Arvizo was arguing that the exculpatory, but accurate statements she and her children had made for our rebuttal video were false. At the same time, she had been talking to Larry Feldman, the lawyer who had gotten the family of Jordan Chandler the $22 million out-of-court settlement back in 1993. Feldman hired psychologist, Dr. Stan Katz, to examine the children of Janet Ventura-Arvizo. Katz was the same man who had examined Jordan Chandler in 1993. Janet Ventura-Arvizo claimed to be seeking legal advice for fear of being accused of leaving her children unattended with a 45-year-old man — Michael Jackson. After consulting with Feldman and Katz, Janet Ventura-Arvizo concluded that all her previous relief statements were false and that she had been compelled to make them. What was now true, according to her, was Michael's guilt. That she immediately consulted a lawyer and a psychologist who assisted in her statement was an indication to us that they were after an out-of-court settlement. She wanted to make money from her final trump card, her acquaintance with Michael Jackson, who had always behaved extraordinarily generous towards her. The new allegations from Feldman, Katz, and the Arvizos also landed on the desk of Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon.

@Sicloudstorm @MJJTruthSeeker @yea186714 lol what extortion that’s what they want you to believe but that’s not what they actually doing lol

This person @yea186714 locked the comments after posting this nonsense. So I’m replying him here: 1): You didn’t answer my questions directly. Of course I know that there’s a difference between civil and criminal courts. That doesn’t explain the contradiction: if Jordan had supposedly given a wrongful description of MJ’s genitalia, why did the Jackson camp agree to pay tens of millions to settle the case just weeks later? You failed to even address this. Your arguments lacks logic. According to fans like you Jordan had just ruined his case by giving a bogus body description of MJ. You don’t award a kid tens of millions after making such a big blunder! Here’s where your logic fails! Regardless of the burden of proof being generally lower in civil court than in criminal court. That would have been a gift for the defence. But no, the Jackson camp decides the best option is to settle anyway? Wtf! It makes no sense. In the civil case the Chandlers would have to prove that the abuse happened more likely than not: and with that big blunder the numbers would have greatly been in MJ’s favour. Especially when you add the alleged extortion claim on top of it, which fans like you love to rely on. 2): The "they settled because it was best for MJ’s career" argument doesn’t stick either. Also here your logic fails for many reasons. How can MJ settle the civil case to concentrate on his career when a criminal investigation is still ongoing at the time of the settlement? This proves my point. The settlement was meant as a conclusion, not to pave way for some imaginary criminal trial. Silence the boy = kill the case. It was never about the police not being able to find no evidence. All evidence was tied to the boy! This is most common in child-sexual abuse cases. The prosecutions problem was that IMMEDIATELY after the strip-search MJ`s lawyer slickly started the negotiations of the settlement. The police couldn't move forward without being sure they had a boy willing to testify. Jordan Chandler never gave such assurances during this time and didn’t even appear at the grand jury hearings. The description is tied to the accuser, so without his testimony it becomes very difficult to admit and use effectively in court due to hearsay and confrontation issues Furthermore MJ’s struggles both in his career and in his finances has been proven to have been tied to the 1994 settlement. If protecting his career was  the priority, going to court would have made more sense. The settlement cost him sponsors, severely harmed his finances for the rest of his life, and significantly damaged his public image. The HIStory tour struggled financially during its first leg. The tour failed to attract any sponsor! The list is long! The settlement was a catastrophe from many angles. So your reasoning doesn’t make sense. First you must understand why MJ settled. It was to avoid jail. Understand that MJ actually booked studio time to record the HIStory album only weeks after the settlement announcement! How could he do that if they were anticipating a damn criminal trial? How could Cochran say it was time to "heal and move on" when announcing the settlement-right in the middle of the criminal investigation? It all points to that they were sure Jordan had been silenced, they were safe from his testimony 👇

퀸시존스가 푼 아기마잭 썰 너무 귀여운 것 같음. 리허설 중에 가슴팍에서 꼬깃꼬깃한 종이 꺼내서 소크라테스, 아리스토텔레스, 공자의 명언을 낭송하곤 했는데 어느날은 소크라테스를 소크레이티스라고 해서 퀸시가 정정해줬다고..혼자 독서하고 써둔거라 어떻게 발음하는지를 몰랐던 거.. 귀엽다 진짜🤦‍♀️

마이클잭슨이 팬에게 쓴 편지 - 여러분은 저를 향한 신의를 증명해 주었습니다. 여러분 모두의 눈을 진짜 마주하며 이야기를 나눌 수 있으면 좋겠는데, 제가 너무 수줍음이 많네요. 바보 같이 들리겠지만 사실이랍니다. 진심으로 여러분 모두를 아주 많이 사랑합니다. 사람들이 저에 대해 지어내는 그 모든 이상한 이야기들을 믿지 말아 주세요. 가끔 저는 울기도 하지만, 제가 계속해서 나아갈 수 있게 해주는 것은 바로 여러분과 같은 팬들입니다. 사랑해요, 마이클이.

🧵 “Gone Too Soon” é mais do que uma música. É o retrato de uma amizade que ajudou a combater o preconceito. 🤍🕊️

우리오빠가 팬들을 너무 아랑해..😍

oprah MOVEEEE i can’t see michael