Yellowwalrus67

458 posts

Yellowwalrus67

Yellowwalrus67

@yellowwalrus65

Katılım Haziran 2023
14 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Hey, I have to go with personal experiences, and anecdotes with stuff like this, personally, I've seen far more predators/groomers against lolicons than for lolicons, and the lolicon predators aren't very common at all, and they commonly go against predators if they do exist.
English
1
0
0
31
SuperBearNeo
SuperBearNeo@SuperBearNeo·
According to Anti, these things are more "ethical" than Lolisho: 1) Murder 2) Self-Harm 3) Suicide 4) Child Abuse 5) Gore 6) Harassment 7) Spamming CSEM 8) Belittling CSA survivors 9) Doxxing people 10) Genocide It's insane what lengths people go to for fiction
SuperBearNeo tweet media
English
8
323
1.7K
11.6K
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Correct, being a pedophile is exclusively attraction to children, but the problem with pedophiles is that attraction to children leads to them raping, and abusing people who inherently cannot consent.
English
1
0
0
11
Yellowwalrus67
Yellowwalrus67@yellowwalrus65·
@Agoristfurry @SuperBearNeo If you can imagine in your head right now literally anything physical it proves me right, if someone "imaginative" can visualize something real I was right all along
English
1
0
0
12
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Nope, fictional characters cannot be depictions, drawings, and representations of children no matter how much you said otherwise, I keep telling you why it's wrong, you just reject it because you didn't like my answer. x.com/Agoristfurry/s…
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry

@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Could you find, identify, and point to the living, breathing child that's being depicted and exploited with the creation of the lolicon content or not? If not, they're not depictions, and you're talking out of your ass.

English
1
0
0
7
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo 4. No, all being a lolicon, and being attracted to lolis shows is that they're attracted to fictional characters, that's it, you can't say anymore than that.
English
1
0
0
10
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo 1. Hilariously enough, I'M NOT EVEN A LOLICON, I JUST DEFEND LOLICONS. 2. No, I already showed you why lolicons are attracted to lolis. 3. I literally showed you a study showing pedophiles aren't even attracted to, and can't get off to lolicon content.
English
2
0
0
31
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Except AGAIN, you cannot be a pedophile based off being attracted to any fictional character, because fictional characters including lolis are not children
English
1
0
0
7
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo And the pedophiles who are in the lolicon community, and doing this are not very frequent at all, so you attacking the lolicon material as a whole, and thinking pedophiles are attracted to it is false.
English
1
0
0
14
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Obviously, there COULD be pedophiles who are attracted to real children and will use fiction as a way to cope with their attraction and want CSEM. But for that to happen, they also have to be attracted to moe. It's not enough for them to just be attracted to children.
English
2
0
0
18
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Then what the hell even is your claim if you're saying there's not a causal link between lolicon and pedophilia? Saying that a pedophile COULD be attracted to lolicon, and you could be a pedophile for beign attracted to lolicon? I'll go over that claim now.
English
2
0
0
22
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo It's a point to show how invalid it is to claim that fictional attractions reflect your IRL attractions, this is just one example, I could provide more to show how invalid it is.
English
1
0
0
7
Ezzeddine | عزالدين
@yellowwalrus65 We aren’t denying it, but just like everything, you need context to understand it. The prophet explains how it is done through his actions, and the Hadith says it is done in a way that does not harm her. Do you even read anything I give you?
English
1
0
0
10
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo But the thoughts outside of fiction are...towards fictional characters, the sexual attraction to fictional characters/themes in fictional content is real, no one is denying that, the entire claim is that your fictional attractions do not reflect your IRL attractions.
English
1
0
0
7
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Pedophilic disorder is a deeply rooted disorder you develop in the womb or from swept childhood trauma. Not from watching a cartoon according to psychologists/therapists.
English
1
0
0
10
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo Generally, you wouldn't become a pedophile, and become attracted to children if there wasn't an inclination towards those tendencies to begin with, no matter what fiction you consume/what fictional characters you're attracted to. You wouldn't become a pedophile from fiction.
English
2
0
0
17
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo So again, you're claiming a link between a fictional attraction, and an IRL attraction, and that you will rape children because of lolicon, and there's a causal link somewhere...thanks for proving that my refutation was actually correct.
English
2
0
0
25
Furryfloofer
Furryfloofer@Agoristfurry·
@yellowwalrus65 @SuperBearNeo But the lolicon discussion is inherently outside an in universe context by its very nature, you're trying to apply in universe stuff into a debate where it doesn't belong.
English
1
0
0
3