toxic product manager in blockchain

Probably built by AI as well. And it will be the sign of a new era. And I'm actually looking forward to it.

But it went in a different direction: now we have LLMs to code for us. So I believe that soon we will see a new programming language specifically designed for AI. It will offer performance but will likely be much harder for humans to use. Think Assembler, but AI-oriented.

Before LLM entered our lives (about five years ago, haha!), I thought that soon there would be a programming language much easier to use, allowing anyone to code anything. At that time, graphical programming, IFTTT, and similar tools seemed to be the direction we were heading.

Stripe understands that, and they have devs as users, so building their own infra is just an obvious step.

@arc is a very obvious step after the success of CCTP. Stablecoins will drive the next wave of blockchain adoption.

Tokens without utility or revenue share are memecoins. $W - 3-governance proposals since TGE, none matters, Mcap 380M $JUP - many governance proposals, none matters, governance stopped without a voting (lmfao), Mcap 1.5B Compare with $DOGE Mcap of 32B. Simply bad memecoins.

I don't really understand why we use wallets for user identification in Web3. - Not convenient: user can have many wallets on many chains; - Not confidential: user exposes all the transactions on login; - Hard for Web2 users to understand. Wallets are for transactions.

So now when I see that some chain is "for gaming", I smell that something is not right. I think you guys should too.

Play-to-earn though used to be an interesting concept, and they researched it. But at the end of the day, these games still need a party that pays for everything, and none of them found the sustainable financial model.

Gaming does not need crypto. Some time ago I talked to the top-manager of one the biggest companies that build mobile games. Below are his takes.

@KyleSamani Both @pumpdotfun and @zora ignore the fundamental factor: content distribution. For the creator, the audience and attention is tied to the distribution platform. Monetization is also connected to distribution, ignoring this = failure.

0/ What Pump and Zora are trying to build is entertainment + trading The history of entertainment + trading dates all the way back to... Jim Cramer! He is the OG Neither Pump nor Zora have cracked it yet. Why? bc entertainment and finance are somewhat in conflict A 🧵

@vohvohh @pumpdotfun did their exit via degens, it's time to move on. Surprisingly, no one was saying this before the TGE, lol.

Solana culture was largely built on the backs of OG Solana NFT community

The UAE Golden Visa by @ton_blockchain ended in nothing. Who could’ve possibly seen that coming? Shocking. tradingview.com/news/cryptobri…

Great article! Crypto is full of shit, so this kind of article is a rare diamond.

@therosieum Wow, that's just an awesome article! Thanks for posting, it's simply great! I had the same feeling, and you provided data proving it.

@alphagrowl @JupiterExchange Can you elaborate how meow’s net worth is linked to $JUP? I'm honestly not aware of that.

@ymediakov @JupiterExchange I think they mentioned DAO vote to decide what to do with litterbox Also, meow’s net worth is linked to this token - i want to bet on good teams, they ll surely come around. I still do maintain that the team has been very selfish so far..

Why on earth should $JUP go up? - Circulating supply growing - Utility = pointless votes + ASR that just prints more tokens - Zero tie to @JupiterExchange revenue and no treasury rights Maybe… do the math?

@alphagrowl @JupiterExchange Inflation distribution via staking was always questionable for $JUP. Inflation is basically bad, as long as we don't see utility. It's a basic economics: no organic demand, more supply = result is easy to predict. Staking rewards can never cover these losses.

@ymediakov @JupiterExchange Also, staking is live so not that you cant retain your share of the pie as more inflation happens.

@alphagrowl @JupiterExchange I really love the @JupiterExchange product. The problem is the $JUP. Now it is just the token with same name. I believe that instead of hopium, $JUP holders need to form the demand: $JUP need to have program-based and DAO controlled connection with product revenue.

@ymediakov @JupiterExchange Agree that DAO voting was flawed but Jupiter is an excellent platform…agree that the team is greedy but they also act like they care. Hopium is a better approach than ranting and crashing things to the ground. Price has suffered with all the FUD..