Jamerson
53 posts


@NFTPartners $NASA is mostly flows hitting tiny illiquid holdings. It can pump fast on the way up, but when people start selling it will crash
English


Guy keeps saying “buy $NASA” bashing $XOVR & $ARKVX, is he paid? Disclosures? 📷 SEC alert. If $NASA gets SpaceX exposure via an SPV, don’t market it like direct SpaceX shares you deceive retail. Ur tiny stocks barely trade AUM pushes them up but shorts notice-exit door is ugly
Marcos Milla@MarcosMillaYT
Nice $XOVR you have SpaceX as the top holding yet you’re evaporating money for investors… Just buy $NASA or $TSLA for direct or indirect exposure to SpaceX pre-IPO
English

$FNUC Market Watch:
• Market setup drawing comparisons to Dec 2024 momentum
• Institutional buying activity remains in focus
• Limited selling pressure visible in the order book
• Traders watching for a potential breakout move
#FNUC #Stocks #Trading #Investing #StockMarket
English

$ONDS continues to gain momentum after reporting strong revenue and guidance. Traders are watching closely as the stock approaches key resistance levels, with bullish sentiment building compared to previous performance.
#ONDS #Stocks #Trading #Investing #StockMarket
English

$NASA $ARKVX $XOVR $MARS $UFO
Jamerson@yudylena
Real question: is $NASA paying @MarcosMillaYT for these videos comparing $NASA vs $XOVR $UFO $MARS and $ARKVX ? Bigger SEC question: how is $NASA allowed to market “direct” SpaceX exposure if the position appears to be held through an SPV? Retail investors deserve clarity imo
QCT

$SOFI could buy back a major chunk of shares over the next few years as profitability grows.
Add possible S&P 500 inclusion, stablecoins, business banking growth, and Clarity Act approval.
A future dividend would be the cherry on top.
#SOFI #Stocks #Investing
English

@MarcosMillaYT I bought $NASA bc of the “direct exposure” marketing and honestly thought it meant direct SpaceX shares and Then I realized it appears to be through an SPV. That’s a big difference for retail investors… SEC should review imo
English

Real question: is $NASA paying @MarcosMillaYT for these videos comparing $NASA vs $XOVR $UFO $MARS and $ARKVX ? Bigger SEC question: how is $NASA allowed to market “direct” SpaceX exposure if the position appears to be held through an SPV? Retail investors deserve clarity imo
Marcos Milla@MarcosMillaYT
How do shareholders in ETFs like $NASA or funds like $XOVR ARKVX know if SpaceX went up or down in value? You can’t pull up a stock chart of SpaceX because it hasn’t gone public… So does it magically just go up?
English
Jamerson retweetledi

$META trades at a lower valuation than the market… while still delivering stronger growth and dominant market positioning.
That combination is why so many investors remain bullish. 📈
#META #Meta #StockMarket #GrowthStocks
English

@MarcosMillaYT Bro, both $XOVR and $NASA own SpaceX via the same mechanism called SPV. $NASA is under SEC investigation for misrepresenting its prospectus - stating they own shares of SpaceX
English

The ONLY ETF I trust with exposure to SpaceX Pre-IPO that is liquid, doesn’t screw you over with hidden fees, and has major upside potential with pure exposure to the space economy…
Is $NASA
NOT $XOVR
If SpaceX goes up…. $NASA is guaranteed to go up with it… unlike other funds…
NASA WILL OWN SpaceX even when it IPOs
English

• $META combines rapid growth with relatively cheap valuation metrics
• Few mega-cap tech names are growing this fast at these multiples
• AI momentum and advertising strength continue driving optimism
• The risk/reward profile is becoming increasingly attractive 🚀
#META
English

DUOL beats earnings… and the stock drops.
Why? Concerns over slowing user growth and bookings.
Revenue: $291M
EPS: $0.89
Strong numbers, but the market is looking ahead — and it doesn’t like what it sees.
#DUOL #StockMarket #Investing #GrowthStocks
English



