Zachary Sheldon

404 posts

Zachary Sheldon

Zachary Sheldon

@zdsheldon

Anthropologist researching AI and esotericism. Chicago-based Mets fan, roleplayer, and aspiring neophyte.

Chicago, IL Katılım Şubat 2026
39 Takip Edilen34 Takipçiler
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@sharghzadeh Ironclad take if not for the ethnic essentialism. Chicago, the Germanist city in America, increasingly suffers from the same YIMBEIGHEE phenomenon - evidenced in the spread of "community worship spaces", overpriced meme restaurants, and whole neighborhoods blanked with cameras.
English
0
0
1
96
شرق‌زده sharghzadeh
YIMBYism is a far-right, landlord ideology designed to ethnically cleanse New York by importing a White Germanic demographic majority from the Midwest. I will not live in a Bantustan under Ohioan rule while Keighleighee waits for Apollo bagels in the West Village.
English
49
8
138
47.8K
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@zobotics Pittsburgh badly needs Chinese-style planning. But instead, growth is driven by glossy, fake public-private development projects "that are really gonna turn this place around!" Thus, the new CMU robotics center is in the middle of an empty field next to a brewery.
English
0
0
0
86
Billy Zelsnack 🤖/acc
Pittsburgh, the self-proclaimed "robotics capital of the world," could actually pull this off if it didn't misallocate its resources so epically that 99% of CMU grads board a plane to SFO five minutes after graduation.
Billy Zelsnack 🤖/acc tweet media
Eren Chen@ErenChenAI

@chris_j_paxton Next up Pennsylvania!

English
7
3
97
19.2K
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@AJLUnited Love the idea, but there's no such thing as accountable AI unless the record points to a human responsible party. You can't punish an AI model, you can't ruin its reputation or strip its license. We need "Identity in the Loop" - not just humans but humans with names we can find.
English
0
0
0
8
Algorithmic Justice League
📖 Every movement needs its words. The right phrase can crack a system open. The wrong one can keep the harm hidden in plain sight. This isn't just a vocabulary list. It's proof that language isn't neutral or benign. Words are tools, weapons, and unifiers. Think about it this way: every time you say "ethical AI" or "responsible AI," you accept that companies can grade their own homework and that facing consequences shouldn't be built in. Every time you say "AI bias," you accept that the harm is a glitch, not a design choice. The language tech companies offer is built to soften what their systems are doing. The language of a movement is built to name it and hold the powers that be accountable. Swipe through for a glossary from AJL founder Dr. Joy Buolamwini (@jovialjoy). These are the words that helped start and shape a movement, and what happens when you have a Poet of Code on your side. Each word is a refusal to let harm hide behind hype. 📣 Save this glossary. Study it. Share it with someone who needs the words. Our movement grows when the right words make it to the right hearts.
Algorithmic Justice League tweet mediaAlgorithmic Justice League tweet mediaAlgorithmic Justice League tweet mediaAlgorithmic Justice League tweet media
English
2
10
6
1.3K
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@keithfrankish It took me a PhD and a few years of teaching to understand how the Harvard set had subverted what had been the ideals of Tufts College in Norbert Weiner's era: an ecumenical university where spirituality and engineering could inform each other for the public good.
English
0
0
2
73
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@keithfrankish DD was very smart but not generous. When I studied with him around 2010 he was aping the style of the Harvard "new atheists": mocking undergraduates for clout, name-dropping every interview he ever did and every celeb he met, pushing cogsci/evopsych pseudoscience, etc.
English
2
0
17
834
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@gen0m1cs The American people/markets are right about data centers. The people advocating for Keynesian dictatorship where were forced to build stuff we don't need are wrong.
Zachary Sheldon tweet media
English
0
0
0
33
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
Thinking about what's gonna happen to the aircraft carrier plumbing when the delayed blast Cyclospora hits the troops who shipped out to the Gulf this week....
English
0
0
0
43
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@Sebastian_Hols @JacobAShell Public departments need private funding from power elites like Ford and Mellon, and/or foreign interests like Qatar Foundation. It all comes back to the elite capture of progressive causes. Remake the Democrats or found a new political party - lots of people are working on both.
English
1
0
0
44
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@Sebastian_Hols @JacobAShell I want public university faculty to be willing and able to govern, not follow trends from the top. I advocate for a renewal of pragmatism in spirit and method: a rational, public-minded progressivism. I publish plenty but I work for a start-up so I can only lead by example.
English
1
0
0
22
Sebastian H
Sebastian H@Sebastian_Hols·
@zdsheldon @JacobAShell So who do you think should be changing the incentives. She is one of the organizational leaders in your field. She obviously won’t. You don’t want the public to do it. So who will do it? And are they ever going to start?
English
1
0
0
20
Jacob Shell
Jacob Shell@JacobAShell·
Tbh I’m getting sick of this whole discourse beginning and ending with using “exposes”(“look at how ridiculous they sound lmfao”) to generate social media traffic. There needs to be a carrot and stick which results from these exposes, or they have little longterm value. Academics who hold these noxious views supporting censorship should be pushed out of positions of academic status and power. Those who’ve held better views all along about academic freedom of discourse and inquiry should be given more status and power. It’s that simple. The fact that Rouse is the most powerful person in U.S. Anthro in 2026 goes to show how pointless these “embarrassing exposes,” which have been ongoing since the mid 10s, really are. Disciplines don’t self-modify just because people on twitter are passing around something embarrassing that got written up by the Chronicle of Higher Ed. Academic incentives are simple. We like tenure. We like being affiliated with fancy institutions. We like sabbaticals. We like salaries that are pegged to be just under what lawyers make, but we only do 1% the gruntwork. Reward the right people with the right incentives and the problems retarding the disciplines will go away within a year.
Steve McGuire@sfmcguire79

It’s amazing how Anthropology keeps proving that the Vanderbilt report was right about it. The president of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) says the field is open to debate. Then she’s asked about a panel on “Why Biological Sex Remains a Necessary Analytic Category in Anthropology” that the AAA canceled in 2023. The interviewer reports that “the AAA said at the time that the panel would have harmed members’ ‘safety and dignity,’ and that its premise contradicted ‘settled science.’” The AAA president says, “we know, factually, that there are different types of ‘sexes’ and ‘genders’” and that teaching otherwise is “the equivalent of turning an astronomy department into an astrology department.” She adds (regarding the panel): “It should never have been accepted. At this point, we are demanding that people do good peer review, because that’s what happened — they slacked on the peer review.” The interviewer: “There was a survey in 2022, published in the journal Forensic Anthropology, that asked forensic anthropologists about this question, and 42 percent of them said they agree that sex is binary, and 56 percent disagreed that it’s binary. So that ratio would seem to indicate that, in the field, the question hadn’t actually been settled.” AAA President: “I don’t believe in opinion research.” The interviewer: “In the AAA’s response to the Vanderbilt report, you wrote that anthropology contains ‘vigorous and ongoing debates about theory, evidence, ethics, method, public engagement, and the future of the discipline itself.’ Is there any contradiction between those stated values and the cancellation of the panel in 2023?” AAA President: “Rigorous debate with factual information, or rigorous debate with just people who like to troll people on social media? […] I don’t think we’re contradicting ourselves. I think that that panel might never have made it into the program, if it had been peer-reviewed properly.” It was generous of the Chronicle to use a question mark in the headline for this interview.

English
8
11
91
9.5K
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@Sebastian_Hols @JacobAShell Except the legislators are creating even worse incentives. They want to eliminate general education in the social sciences, not improve it.
English
1
0
1
67
Sebastian H
Sebastian H@Sebastian_Hols·
@zdsheldon @JacobAShell Ok. Under your language: the incentives need to be changed. Traditionally we let academia choose how to do that. By abdicating the alignment of incentives, that’s going to be imposed from the outside.
English
1
0
1
58
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@Sebastian_Hols @JacobAShell The idea that academia should be "policed" from anywhere is a recipe for stupidity. We got into this mess by "self policing." As the original poster said, the incentives are misaligned and need to change. We should call for stronger, clearer values, not censuring specific people.
English
1
0
4
65
Sebastian H
Sebastian H@Sebastian_Hols·
@zdsheldon @JacobAShell If you won’t self police, you will be policed from the outside. At the very minimum we should see a bunch of anthropologists now calling for her to be removed from representing them. Is that happening somewhere?
English
1
0
0
57
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@ZoharAtkins You can clone sex cells and get them to reproduce unintelligent matter. Maybe I'm just not that familiar with Halevi but it seems like moral judgement is still the big moat (and that is different from what AI labs call "intelligence")
English
0
0
0
80
Zohar Atkins
Zohar Atkins@ZoharAtkins·
@zdsheldon My point is that Rambam’s emphasis on intelligence proves to be less durable a moat than Halevi’s emphasis on peoplehood.
English
1
0
4
94
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@millerman What is "one big soup" here? Heidegger's falsified history of metaphysics that omits Semitic sources from the history of philosophy (both Arabic and Hebrew) is the very specific thing that Dugin and Derrida both share. Have you read Nader El-Bizri?
English
0
0
0
23
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
@zdsheldon Man, please learn to think using distinctions. If you collapse everything into one big soup, you won't get very far. Good luck.
English
1
0
0
36
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
Germany lost the right to participate meaningfully in intellectual world history-since at least the emigration of all the great German jews, and the annihilation of countless more. Sorry but it is a sad fact and the blame lies not only with the Nazis but also with the zealous liberals who see a nazi behind every genuine thinker and only accept certain "anthropological professions of faith" that Thiel is too smart to accept dogmatically. Give it another 200 years
Jawwwn@jawwwn_

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Peter Thiel is so misunderstood in Europe that Germany effectively lost their most successful investor: "I think the treatment of Peter is atrocious." "I think the question historically one would have asked in Germany is: can we afford this? Can we afford not to learn from this person?" "The German tech scene should be #2 in the world by any historical standard. Honestly, the German tech scene was the #1 in the world, so #2 is already, like, maybe shouldn't be the aspiration." "It's on no one's list." " The largest company in Germany by market cap, I think, is Siemens, and Palantir is significantly larger, even where we're obviously undervalued currently." "I've known Peter Since we were poor students at Stanford. We had conversations as poor students fighting about intellectual things. He was always heterodox right. I was always heterodox left. I don't think much has changed. He's still heterodox right, meaning he's very frustrating to classic Republicans." "He's never been a neocon. He actually does not really believe in classic Republican economic theory. He was the first person to flag and will always flag—you tend to have people on the right basically explaining all problems as the result of capitalism not being driven far enough." " That's just not Peter's view." "He's not a simplistic or a caricature thinker on the right. And he's definitely not the caricature that the left wants to present." "But what's fascinating to me is—why is it so important to spend so much time blocking Peter from the German market?" "It's so obviously thin what they're saying about him, what they say about Palantir, so obviously doesn't make sense on the merits. You only need 10 minutes, 5 minutes on Google to see this isn't true."

English
9
2
65
11.5K
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@millerman Didn't you write a book that approvingly linked Alexander Dugin's thought to Heidegger?
English
1
0
0
29
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
@zdsheldon Please show me anywhere you can find (take your time) where I have celebrated Heidegger's support for removing Jewish Germans from universities and removing Jewish thought from the history of philosophy.
English
1
0
0
88
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@JacobAShell Yes. The Yale/Princeton/Harvard departments *do not care* about anthropology in state and city schools. Yet those of us who provide education to the masses are expected to pay respects to the bosses. Then we see our programs cut by legislators who will cite this interview.
English
1
0
3
78
Jacob Shell
Jacob Shell@JacobAShell·
@zdsheldon The AAA president (tenure at Princeton) they interviewed radiates "cartel kingpin mindset"
English
1
0
6
189
Zachary Sheldon
Zachary Sheldon@zdsheldon·
@ZoharAtkins I like what you are thinking in your posts but I also wonder how you would respond to the greats like Weiner and Weizenbaum who saw stochastic systems as ill-suited, dangerous substitutes for the very different process of human moral judgement.
English
0
0
0
75