HuDie
37 posts


川普落地了,央视连直播接机都开了,三军仪仗队和群众队伍都安排上了。估摸着待会儿还有正副国级官员接机。 真是从没见过的欢迎外国元首的规模,普京都没享受过这样的待遇。 看来这一趟一定是要给川子哄开心了😆

@jxzdmzw 确实,秦制国家可以极限对内榨取,对外低成本掠夺,这确实是2000年来第一次,极大放大秦制的优势并延缓秦制的自我毁灭,只要外部输血不断,就能前所未有的对内镇压汲取,而不担心贱民造反,秦制系统内的权贵子孙也可以逃离被献忠的命运,代价就是秦制下的编户齐民作为全世界的奴隶进行生产和燃烧自己









The Manus situation is bigger than one deal. It signals a chilling message for founders - especially Chinese entrepreneurs (still in China): Some “wise men” commented on this deal and said “Choose your destiny on Day 1 — and never change your mind.” What they meant is - if you choose to start your company in China, then stick to it. If you’ve decided to go overseas, start a foreign company from day 1. That sounds reasonable. But it is fundamentally incompatible with how startups actually work. Startups pivot. Markets change. Regulations evolve. Founders adapt. Telling entrepreneurs they must decide at incorporation exactly where the company will end up — and then punishing them for changing strategy later — is absurd. That’s like saying: “If you date someone, you must know from Day 1 whether you’ll marry them. Otherwise don’t date at all.” Yes, Manus took local support, laid off the original team, and restarted elsewhere, people can debate whether that was ethical. But ethics and legality are not the same thing. If founders are no longer allowed to restructure, relocate, pivot, or rebuild without political consequences, then the message is clear: You don’t truly own what you build. That is bad for entrepreneurship. Bad for innovation. Bad for long-term trust in the startup ecosystem. The game has changed — and founders everywhere should pay attention.































