Henry Zhuhao Wang

Thrilled to add two new pieces this cycle: Inference Rules Reconsidered, 102 Indiana Law Journal (forthcoming 2027) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… Navigating Expertise in Adjudication, 98 University of Colorado Law Review (forthcoming 2027) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

How do rules of evidence shape dispute resolution behind the scenes? FSU Law Professor @zhuhwang , Mason Ladd Professor of Law, has published a new Utah Law Review article titled “The Shadow of the Rules of Evidence on ADR.” The article examines how evidentiary rules influence negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. He also received the inaugural “New Voices in Dispute Resolution” Scholar Award from the AALS ADR Section. READ: dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2026/is…

My co-authored article with @edwardkcheng, Evidentiary Rules for Administrative Hearings, is now out in @TexasLRev. It asks whether evidentiary rules should change as adjudication increasingly moves beyond jury trials. texaslawreview.org/evidentiary-ru…

A special addition to my treasure collection!

Wang on Inference Rules, legaltheoryblog.com/2026/03/31/wan… - Henry Zhuhao Wang (Florida State University – College of Law) has posted Inference Rules Reconsidered (102 Indiana Law Journal __ (forthcoming 2027)) on SSRN.

Happy to share that my article, The Shadow of the Rules of Evidence on ADR, is now published in the @UtahLawReview (2026 Utah L. Rev. 213). It is the lead article in Volume 2026, Issue 2. dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2026/is…

We are climbing the ranks and have reached our highest U.S. News & World Report ranking in history! We’ve jumped 4 spots to secure the No. 34 position overall in the nation. We are also officially a Top 15 public law school at No. 14 and received Top 25 recognition for five of our legal specialties. Thank you to our faculty, students, and alumni for their dedication to making FSU Law one of the nation’s best law schools.

The highest quality video of the moon was just released… this is so beautiful.

FSU Law is looking for a bold, visionary leader to join us as our next Dean, an extraordinary opportunity to help shape the future of a great law school. Position profile: wittkieffer.com/positions/a1wu… Nominations, inquiries, and applications: Werner Boel at wernerb@wittkieffer.com.

@AlexNunn Amazing! Congrats Alex!

Very excited to see the sixth edition of the “Exculpatory Evidence” treatise now in print! Getting to work with Ed Imwinkelried on the project has been such a joy.

Ayer falleció Susan Haack. Fuy muy grande y tenía un particular sentido del humor. Fue maestra y referente de muchos de nosotros, que aprendimos de sus libros y conferencias. Estuvo en Girona muchas veces y recibió el Premio Internacional de Cultura Jurídica. ¡Descanse en paz!

@AlexNunn @MinnesotaLawRev @NotreDameLRev Congrats, Alex!

Excited to share two forthcoming projects in the @MinnesotaLawRev and the @NotreDameLRev about federal courts’ increasing reliance on “external” factfinding of epistemically dubious provenance. The first, “Factfinding Revolutions” (forthcoming @NotreDameLRev), traces the rise and fall of previous Anglo-American factfinding regimes--from the ordeal to the self-informing jury to oath-centric proceedings to the adversarial trial--to identify a recurring structure of regime collapse. When that framework is turned toward the present, the Article suggests that the era of the adversarial trial is in a state of terminal decline, with adjudication transitioning to a new age defined by decentralized “external” factfinding. The second, “The Article III Factfinding Power” (forthcoming @MinnesotaLawRev), considers the constitutional dimensions of that shift. It argues that, as factfinding moves outside the courtroom, federal courts nonetheless retain the authority and duty to preserve an essential baseline of epistemic legitimacy in the factfinding that grounds their judgments. Put simply, Article III does not require federal judges to oversee factfinding themselves, but it does require that they ensure external factfinding is epistemically legitimate if it is to serve as the basis for an Article III judgment. I’ll post both papers once SSRN actually approves them (ugh), but feel free to reach out in the interim to get a copy. I welcome your comments!

Huge congratulations to our promotion and tenure candidates on this incredible milestone! Professors @zhuhwang , @jacob_eisler, @nbanteka , and @michaelmorley11 each received letters from Richard McCullough approving this well-deserved recognition of their exceptional research, inspiring teaching, and dedicated service. We are so proud of all you’ve accomplished and grateful for the impact you make every day!

@AlexNunn @FSUCollegeofLaw Thanks Alex!

@zhuhwang @FSUCollegeofLaw Congrats! Very well deserved.

Tenure, effective August 2026! Many thanks to the @FSUCollegeofLaw community and my tremendous evidence colleagues for all your support over the past few years. I'm incredibly grateful to have the opportunity to continue to grow as a scholar and teacher.

NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!! 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 Florida State wins its 5th NCAA title with a 1-0 win over #1 Stanford!!!!

Most 40-PT games after turning 30 years old: 44 — Michael Jordan 44 — Steph Curry THE TWO GREATEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME.

I’m thrilled to share that my article, Cross-Sovereign Policing and the Constitutional Crisis of Accountability, will be forthcoming in the @YaleLJournal! Especially excited this piece is coming together as I go up for tenure this fall.

I'm excited to share that my coauthored article with @edwardkcheng—Evidentiary Rules for Administrative Hearings, 104 Texas Law Review (forthcoming 2026)—is now available on SSRN. Download and read here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…. Would love to hear your thoughts!