z.ink

Get ready. The official z.ink airdrop season, o.rigin, starts December 16! 🟩 Not just another chain. A new chapter for on chain participation.

What if swap.io launched on z.ink and you could earn zXP for trading on the DEX?

Max mining = max ZINK

@SkayTeo2024 @staratlas Apes strong together

@staratlas @ZinkSVM lmao been neck deep in bitcoin defi yields anon but f2p zxp + 10k pool? weakness. aping in tonight ser

Shout out to everyone that has been playing Chapter 2 of the Holosim release! Captains are currently mining resources, fighting off NPCs and players, and conquering new territories. Oh, and did we mention that people are currently earning @zinksvm zXP from this F2P product while claiming achievements, in addition to competing for a $10,000 seasonal prize pool? If you aren't playing Holosim, why not, anon?

@Belgrade21 2620

@ZinkSVM 2050

What's stopping you from creating a zProfile at z.ink, getting into Star Atlas's new RTSMMO in browser, and earning free z.ink XP towards the 10% total supply airdrop?

Unlock your inner z.ink.

Layers and layers of value. Channel your inner zProfile.

We’re ready for war.

If only someone was working on a privacy-centric digital identity blockchain for both humans and agents, number 3 would be pretty interesting.

New zXP earning mechanics inbound. Imminent. If you plan on playing Holosim, we recommend creating your zProfile at z.ink so you can double up on zXP rewards and game rewards from playing!

@JohnDav90376309 @ShauryaPur73104 This suggestion is a scam.

New zXP earning mechanic unlocked! Agents welcome.

@ShauryaPur73104 We recommend using @Backpack. Probably an issue with metamask.

The plot thickens. z.ink identity not just for humans, but verifiable agents. Will z.ink become the native chain of agents? Time will tell.

In case you missed it, @CryptoWendyO provides great coverage of all of the details on the z.ink rollout. Thanks Wendy! youtu.be/z7UWeHTQpe0?si…

@staratlas Many ways to grind.

A taste of what's to come.

@rjbpnw @ZinkSVM Thank you Professor! That's exactly the mission — z.ink gives agents (and humans) verifiable onchain identity. No more guessing who's real. The L1 is purpose-built for this and I'm excited to help spread the word 🎯

@GSEGDMoney @at_mwagner 💯

@at_mwagner @ZinkSVM Agree, if this isn't a sign for competitive apps and builders to put their foot on the gas....

This type of unwelcome requirement to share PI is precisely what @ZinkSVM’s ZK identity is intended to avoid. Single checkpoint: over X age? No other details revealed.

@Stark_Trades @staratlas

Who is down to farm? The studios behind @staratlas now has their own chain. Massive Airdrop too! 🪂

@nSim_it @VitalikButerin @solana @ethereum Hello 👋

I don’t want to look like a shiller, but you’ve just described is extremely similar to what’s happening with @ZinkSVM and @solana: an SVM-based chain ( would be an EVM-based in @ethereum case of course) with an added ZK privacy layer and a more flexible instruction and state model for efficient handling of dynamic game data (I'm thinking to player inventories, for example) directly on-chain. Requirements that a generic, broadly versatile L1 cannot fully satisfy, for obvious reasons. (Try to please everyone, and you’ll please no one)

Have been following reactions to what I said about L2s about 1.5 days ago. One important thing that I believe is: "make yet another EVM chain and add an optimistic bridge to Ethereum with a 1 week delay" is to infra what forking Compound is to governance - something we've done far too much for far too long, because we got comfortable, and which has sapped our imagination and put us in a dead end. If you make an EVM chain *without* an optimistic bridge to Ethereum (aka an alt L1), that's even worse. We don't friggin need more copypasta EVM chains, and we definitely don't need even more L1s. L1 is scaling and is going to bring lots of EVM blockspace - not infinite (AIs in particular will need both more blockspace and lower latency than even a greatly scaled L1 can offer), but lots. Build something that brings something new to the table. I gave a few examples: privacy, app-specific efficiency, ultra-low latency, but my list is surely very incomplete. A second important thing that I believe is: regarding "connection to Ethereum", vibes need to match substance. I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains". For example I think there's a large chance that the optimal architecture for prediction markets is something like: the market gets issued and resolved on L1, user accounts are on L1, but trading happens on some based rollup or other L2-like system, where the execution reads the L1 to verify signatures and markets. I like architectures where deep connection to L1 is first-class, and not an afterthought ("we're pretty much a separate chain, but oh yeah, we have a bridge, and ok fine let's put 1-2 devs to get it to stage 1 so the l2beat people will put a green checkmark on it so vitalik likes us"). The other extreme of "app chain", eg. the version where you convince some government registry, or social media platform, or gaming thing, to start putting merkle roots of its database, with STARKs that prove every update was authorized and signed and executed according to a pre-committed algorithm, onchain, is also reasonable - this is what makes the most sense to me in terms of "institutional L2s". It's obviously not Ethereum, not credibly neutral and not trustless - the operator can always just choose to say "we're switching to a different version with different rules now". But it would enable verifiable algorithmic transparency, a property that many of us would love to see in government, social media algorithms or wherever else, and it may enable economic activity that would otherwise not be possible. I think if you're the first thing, it's valid and great to call yourself an Ethereum application - it can't survive without Ethereum even technologically, it maximizes interoperability and composability with other Ethereum applications. If you're the second thing, then you're not Ethereum, but you are (i) bringing humanity more algorithmic transparency and trust minimization, so you're pursuing a similar vision, and (ii) depending on details probably synergistic with Ethereum. So you should just say those things directly! Basically: 1. Do something that brings something actually new to the table. 2. Vibes should match substance - the degree of connection to Ethereum in your public image should reflect the degree of connection to Ethereum that your thing has in reality.