zkoranges

More granularity added into our «Asset Composition » risk analysis Having a single asset that dominate vault allocation or using the same underlying asset gives penalties on your risk score 👀 This @SteakhouseFi vault on @Morpho is still considered as a Prime tier

Google experimenting with zkPoEX: a reminder that groundbreaking technology doesn’t always find its purpose overnight. Sometimes, even the most powerful innovations take years before the right use case reveals their true value.

At @philidorlabs we’re working on making sure you can understand the yield, and risks involved.

Securing user funds: this is what matters most in DeFi.

Crypto projects love to advertise TEEs and zero-knowledge proofs, which often makes users assume they’re inherently more secure. But without proper due diligence, there’s a good chance these claims are more marketing than substance.

Regarding the USR exploit: Philidor Vaults are NOT exposed. In addition, all of the vaults exposed to USR were marked as “Edge” by our transparent risk methodology.

The problem with promoted “Core” vaults: they’re often Edge in practice Gauntlet USDC Core, marketed as core, shows up as Edge (~4.9/10) on @philidorlabs when you apply a transparent methodology and look at collateral exposure, not the label Don’t trust, Verify

Also, some morpho vaults were hardcoded = 1 Instant rekt. We need a better way of monitoring oracles. At @philidorlabs we’re working on this.

So glad I didn't waste my time learning React, now that it doesn't matter anymore

It could happen to you @Zdeadex

@StaniKulechov Interface shouldn't display swaps with such high price impact though...

Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.

Try it on claude code: claude mcp add philidor --transport http mcp.philidor.io/api/mcp

Can we agree to abolish light mode? My eyes hurt.

Playing with @philidorlabs skills, soon gonna release more details on how DeFi managers, Institutions and more can use them to allocate in DeFi Start by checking your portfolio philidor portfolio 0xxxxx

@Theo_Network 👀

1/ Introducing thUSD: the yield-bearing stablecoin powered by gold.

open-source models are the only ones we can reliably trust from here on out: the weights and code can be inspected, audited, and self-hosted (although not cost-efficiently yet). U.S. AI stocks look increasingly fragile: faster-moving chinese model releases raise the competitive bar, while shifting U.S. policy adds real uncertainty to the market.

@_Akanoa_ Must-have to reduce context usage

Un collègue vient de me faire découvrir ça github.com/rtk-ai/rtk

@crazydnekana 🫡

@zkoranges Transparent risk scores, I like it! Keep building

1/ Most DeFi risk scores are a single number with no explanation. Some are gated behind a pro account. A "7/10" tells you nothing. Is it the collateral? The contracts? The governance? Without decomposition, you're trusting a black box that masks the one dimension that could cause total loss.

7/ We're still working on the fine-tuning of the risk methodology and more updates are coming. If you have any comments or questions, DM or comment. Happy to share ideas.

6/ Every weight, threshold, and override rule is published. Same on-chain inputs always produce the same output. No editorial discretion. No "we know the team" adjustments. A risk framework that can't withstand scrutiny is not a framework: it's an opinion. 759 vaults scored, open: analytics.philidor.io/vaults