ZzeroQ

@ZeeverseGame @CurveFinance

Pebble Sign-Up Event 📝 We're excited to begin a special welcome event for Suuuiplash users!🤩 Sign up for Suuuiplash now and earn exclusive rewards just for joining! 🤔How to Participate: Go to the official Suuuiplash page and create your account: suuuiplash.io/games/suuuipla… After signing up, reply to this post on X with your in-game user ID to complete verification. 🕙Event Period: April 17th ~ April 30th 🎖️Rewards: Exclusive rewards will be given to 50 users who completed the mission by raffle.

It's Premier Season exclusively on @solana ⚽️ We’ve built the most fun and fair way to trade crypto, a fantasy sports style game where you compete with tokens and win SOL. Get in early: cfl.fun Backed by @colosseum. Reply for an invite code.

Hey @375ai_ this is my validation code: 375H7WQ0JB5J7YXU Join me and get a bonus when you sign up! app.375.ai/auth?invitatio…

@bitget #Bitget0GasStocks

Deleting in 24hrs, whoever likes and says "#Bitget0GasStocks", we'll send you you a surprise reward! 🩵

@cfldotfun zzeroq.skr

Who owns a Seeker Phone? Drop your wallet address with .skr below 👇 & follow @cfldotfun You have 48hrs.

And many more projects...

Let’s talk about the facts @blockstranding 🧩 Presale FDV: $3-7M Current announced FDV: $36M TGE: If price launches at $36M FDV, early buyers at $0.009 enter the market ~8× overpriced. @solana @solanamobile @playsolana @magicblock @solflare @MagicEden -can we get some clarity?

3. Neon Link (2024) – FDV x6 increase, TGE delay → -63% 4. OmniDex (2023) – Allocation cut post-sale → -68% 5. MetaSoccer (2022) – FDV $5M→$40M → -88% after launch

#Solana #SolanaMobile #SolanaGaming #Web3 #Blockchain #CryptoGaming #TGE #Presale #DeFi #SolanaEcosystem Here are 5 projects with similar changes 👇 1.RevoLand (2022) – No LP lock, FDV unclear → -100% rug day 1 2.Wagmi Games (2023) – FDV $6M→$30M, no CEX listings → -82% day 1

@blockstranding @Just_quattro @primesdotgg Once again, you’re scammers. You’re stealing from investors and that’s a fact! It was a PRESALE,which means you can’t just change what was agreed at the time people invested. We didn’t donate to you, we invested. But all you say is that you don’t care and will just take our money

Once again. As our sale structure is a discretionary cap and we never stated we were using an oversubscription model, we are not required to issue refunds. Everything will be recalculated pro rata, so all participants will receive proportional terms under the final FDV, and whitelist users will keep the same relative advantage. The advantage between whitelist vs. public purchase and listing will remain in place. By the nature of our sale model, and per the Terms every participant agreed to before depositing, we have the right to set the total amount raised and, accordingly, the final FDV at our own discretion. The tweet you referenced about FDV explicitly mentions the discretionary cap. Any FDV figures mentioned earlier could not be considered final due to the discretionary-cap structure of the presale. Until the sale ended, there couldn’t technically be any fixed FDV, since there was no hard cap. Therefore, all earlier figures should be viewed only as approximate estimates, shared at that time in response to numerous community requests. Those figures were not provided with any intent to mislead. These accusations are false, defamatory, and constitute the spread of misinformation; such claims should be substantiated before being made. We haven’t even launched the token yet, so there’s not even a precedent for dissatisfaction here. On the contrary, we are confident that those spreading FUD will be proven wrong.

We’re excited to reveal our partnership with @primesdotgg, the platform that has powered our social campaign since day one. Before $STRAND TGE, we'll host the separate airdrop activity on PRIMES. PRIMES helps amplify projects of all sizes and rewards contributors, making virality and organic growth accessible to everyone. They're moving out of closed beta. Sign up early for perks.

@blockstranding @mryoungee @primesdotgg Saying “there was never any kind of agreement” makes no sense in a presale context. Once investors deposit funds expecting tokens or specific terms, that is an agreement — even if you call it “discretionary.” You can’t just remove mutual obligations after taking investors’ money.

Please don’t spread misinformation. There was never any kind of agreement. By the discretionary cap nature of our sale model (and according to the Terms every participant agreed to before depositing) we have the right to set the final FDV at our own discretion. Until the sale ended, there technically couldn’t be any fixed FDV, since there was no hard cap. All figures shown earlier were only approximate estimates shared at the time after numerous community requests. The mentioned FDV numbers were never final due to the discretionary cap structure of the presale.

@blockstranding @mryoungee @primesdotgg Nonsense. A presale is an agreement between the project and investors. They invest money, not ask for freebies - they expect what was promised. The price was 0.009 public sale, anything else is fraud. Not approximately the price, it was fixed! Only fdv was flexible

@wynlyfe_ua @blockstranding Cringe, learn how to calculate first... And how can anyone say, "maybe it will end well"? Just no words...

Yesterday news in @blockstranding honestly shocked most and sadly not in a positive way. This cannot be hidden. During the sale it was said about FDV 3 to 7M. The price for the token was 0.009. After a week of waiting the team said they set FDV 36M. The token price from the sale now actually is 0.036 which is several times higher than what was stated. And this looks very incorrect. I think the team had to announce such information publicly before the sale. Even if it was in the terms almost nobody knew. After this trust drops a lot and this shows a very negative trend. I will give my final evaluation after all processes. I do not hide that this moment I do not like. There is still time and the team can fix the situation. Maybe they have their plan and calculated everything to hold FDV 36M at listing. But lets be realistic without strong support this is very hard. I do not rush with conclusions. Maybe everything will end well. But we got the first serious signal and now we must be ready for any scenarios. I believe in the better but I prepare for the worst.

@wynlyfe_ua @Ch1g0z1e @blockstranding Lol what are you talking about? You have numbers, you can calculate everything now, you have people who are disappointed in the project, there will be no new investors after the TGE, only the hard sell to take some percentage of our investments. What do you think the team can do?

@Ch1g0z1e @blockstranding Yes of course time will show how it goes and I am not criticizing the team I just want things to be better and from the feedback we can see that very few people support this.

@wynlyfe_ua @Flaming1001 @blockstranding They cannot, it's impossible for now. Everyone will try to sell at TGE, how much money should they have to not let the token drop? Who will want to invest more in this project after so much fud?

@Flaming1001 @blockstranding Yes my friend this does not look very good right now but if the team can deliver a good result then there will be no questions at all. We can only hope that in the end it might all turn out well.

@obedncm @blockstranding @nrdxhq It's not unchanged!!! How dumb can people be? You can't just make a $36M FDV out of thin air and give everyone tokens at presale prices. It's impossible. We're heading for a hard rug here.

I was one of those who were displeased by the @blockstranding team's decision to change the FDV from $3-7 million to $36 million but after going through this post and many of the @nrdxhq explanations, I have come to like the decision of $36M FDV over the $3-7M FDV. You see, this new FDV doesn't mean any investor has been scammed in any way, but it means the allocation for yappers and in-game activities will be worth way more than it would have originally been. And for investors? You will still make the number of X you would have made under the former FDV, since all the presale terms remain unchanged. In my opinion, this is very BULLISH gStrand, $STRAND is coming

@nrdxhq You are a thief)) anything you write, to justify your actions, will not make you right. If the community asks for a refund because of misleading information, you must give money back

6/ The fact that the final FDV reached $36M does not mean bad acts from the team’s side. We regret that part of our community had to experience negativity around this situation, and we’ll do everything possible to ensure no one is harmed.

Last word regarding the @blockstranding presale summary

@my_kittisak @blockstranding Stop promoting these scammers...

@blockstranding @UtihaNikola There was a price on a presale - 0.009, so what the hell are you doing?!

@UtihaNikola No, that’s not true. And at the very least, this was stated in the Terms, which every participant agreed to before making a deposit.

We’d like to highlight how the discretionary cap model operates (ref. MetaDAO sales), as we didn’t expect that many participants were unfamiliar with this term. The discretionary cap implies a flexible hard cap, meaning it will be set as decided by the team. As the sale did not include an initial hard cap, all figures served as indicative values only. The outlined FDV ($3–7M) reflected our initial planning assumptions, based on the expected scale of participation at the time. It was a projected estimate, not a fixed valuation. The discretionary cap model means the final FDV is determined solely by the total amount raised. Everything will be recalculated pro rata, so all participants will receive identical proportional terms, only under the final FDV - and whitelist users will keep the same relative advantage.

@blockstranding I did Join your presale, because you put a price of 0.009 USD per token, and after the presale You are changing the price. Can you explain, how is this right and legal? @playsolana @solanamobile @solflare @magicblock @MagicEden can anyone explain?