BLM (Buster of Liberal Myths)

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl If you possessed one iota of critical thinking skills, and understood the basic concept of federalism, you would've also understood that I already answered your question.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Answer the question instead of all the red herrings

The most cruel and sadistic comments you will ever receive are literally always from someone with a Bible verse in their bio

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Wait, what? I am the one detached from reality, because I understand that if McDonald's started banning black people, customers would leave in droves and go to their competitors? Hell, it would be larger than the droves leaving blue states for red ones.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Lmfao, what a world you want to live in. Completely detached from 21st century top tier morality. What's your favourite hobby? You'd enjoy it if all of the relevant industries refused to allow your family to participate? Enjoy.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Sorry, until now, I never realized that addressing people's irrational conclusions, meant I was triggered. Drrp, I really don't like your user name, therefore I deem you've lost all credibility. Drrp. And if you defend against irrational attacks, it means you're triggered. Drrp.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk The only person 'triggered' here is the guy writing paragraphs to explain why his own username shouldn't be taken seriously. You’re backpedaling so fast you’re going to hit the 1992 Food Pyramid again. Just take the L and move on.

Major

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Of course you are "not talking about the constitution". Why would you want to talk about something that blows up your asinine talking points?

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl I'm not talking about the constitution lmfao. I'm talking about what was allowed in your country. Removing people from owning slaves. Was this an example of individual liberty being effected at the expense of social justice?

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Btw woodrat, what is "30 yr old nutritional beef to treat patients" even suppose to mean? Is it some sort of extremely tortured metaphor? Make it mak sense to a rational thinking person. Maybe you could portray it as a picture and make it into another infamous leftist meme

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk You're pivoting to bread servings because you know that 'unweighted raw data' you posted is indefensible. Answer the question: Does your 'common sense' doctor use actual math, or do they also rely on 30-year-old nutritional beef to treat patients?

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Umm, not exactly sure what kind of "math" my doctor uses, but whatever it is, his calculations never came up with idiotic answers, like: "your healthy child who has natural immunity, needs to have an experimental injection and umpteen booster shots" Now answer my question.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl I have been answering your desperate pathetic questions for 2 months. You never seem to learn anything and you never get your gotcha moment, so what exactly is the point? You're a flaming hypocrite... me, not so much. That is never going to change.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Why can't you answer the question?

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk There you go making nonsensical assertions again? How is my user name an admission that I have zero credibility? Make it make sense. Sorry the name triggered you to become so irrational. Can you at least admit I never made any such claim here?

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk It’s just my username' is an incredible way to admit you have zero credibility. Thanks for the clarification that your 'Myth Buster' title is purely decorative! 😅

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk So, you conveniently forgot to answer my question: Did you buy into the food pyramid lie that the experts pushed for decades, or did you have the common sense, like me, to see through the bs they were peddling? If you need more examples, I have plenty more to choose from?

You’re calling people "obtuse" while still ignoring that your main "source" for a decline was an unweighted spreadsheet error. ​Question: Does your "common sense" doctor also use unweighted raw data to diagnose you, or do they use actual science? Because claiming a "win" based on a math error is a bold choice, even for an echo chamber.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Who said it was my "main source"? Oh right, you. You are highly amusing the way you glommed onto some amazing piece of information that somehow magically debunks anything I said. You remind me of a woodrat that collects shiny but utterly worthless objects.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk What part of "some" gives you the most problems? Sorry, you don't get to make false assertions about what I am saying. I will continue to call you out. Your imagination does not sync with reality. Your strawman and false assertions are just sad.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk "I prefer political bloggers over medical science" is a long way of saying "I only listen to people who tell me what I want to hear." If you think bloggers have more credibility than the entire medical establishment, you aren't "busting myths," you're just lost in the sauce.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Yes, I bust liberal myths on a regular basis. So what? So i ask again; where did I say I busted a liberal myth here? Hint: just because it is my username, doesn't mean I claimed it or did it here. Hope that helps.

"I didn't claim I busted a myth." ​My brother in Christ, it is literally your username. If you aren't here to provide facts or "bust" anything, you're just another guy with an internet connection and a collection of bad takes. Don't go backpedaling now that the "sources" failed you. ,👇

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Skippy, your opinion of me doesn't change your are obtuseness. Who said the gold standard was a lie? Only person? Did you forget about the other sources? Let me know when you're able to debunk. I bet dollars to donuts, more studies come out soon that support my contention.

Imagine calling someone "obtuse" while your entire argument relies on a Google search result for a report you didn't realize was mathematically flawed. ​If the "gold standard" is a lie, why is the only person agreeing with your "math" a political blogger with no medical degree? Stay in the bubble, the real world uses calculators.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I go to a doctor who isn't a leftwing partisan hack. Common sense is a code word for Common sense. Question: Did you buy into the decades long govt reviewed "food pyramid" lie? I sure the hell didn't. I let common sense guide the way. As usual, eventually I was shown to be right

When the Buster of Liberal Myths is busted, incarceration is the only argument left". 🏛️ ​You're hiding behind "compare vs. equate" because you can't defend the fact that you prefer political bloggers over the AMA, AAP, and APA. ​Answer me this: ​If you have a medical emergency, do you call a political scientist or a doctor? ​Why is a Google search result more credible to you than peer-reviewed clinical outcomes? ​Is "common sense" just a code word for "I ignore any facts that don't fit my narrative"?

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Damn, you are obtuse. Not unrelated to statistics, unrelated to your fallacy. What moving target? I gave you a link with multiple sources. What definition did I change? Where is this imaginary backpedaling? Anyway, thanks for unwittingly admitting you have debunked nothing.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Claims "math is unrelated" while literally using the word "STATISTICAL" in the previous post. ​The backpedaling is moving faster than the actual data at this point. Hard to "debunk" a moving target that changes its own definitions every time it gets checked. 🏃‍♂️

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Umm, I didn't call it "math" nor claim to provide equations, you did. I'm simply pointing out that "math" is unrelated to your fallacious arguments. Funny thing is you haven't debunked a damn thing I said. You offered some conflicting studies and bitched about sample size.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Imagine calling it "math" while providing 0.00 equations. 😭 ​I guess "standard statistical plateau" is just the new academic way of saying "I trust my Echo Chamber more than my eyes." Let me know when the calculator finishes its imaginary long division.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I'm hung up on grammar? You're the one who felt the need to inject it into the conversation. I am just addressing the mindset of people who like you who do that. You also seem very triggered by "busting liberal myths" but I didn't claim I busted a myth here.

It’s funny you’re hung up on grammar when your logic is currently in a coma. ​You’re citing "evidence" that has the statistical weight of a Twitter poll, then acting like you’ve cracked the Da Vinci Code. It’s not a "liberal myth," it’s just basic math. Maybe spend less time "busting" and more time auditing a Community College stats class.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Um, I never once called it a busted myth, you lying POS. Roughly 5 people, huh? Interesting, seems like a liberal myth.

Imagine thinking a 2024 survey which hasn't even finished its full reporting cycle—is a definitive trend. 🤡 ​You're looking at a noisy, sub-sampled slice of a specific election study and calling it a "busted myth." Newsflash: when your sample size for 2006 births is roughly five people in a basement, the graph is going to look like a cliff.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Of course I am right, grammar Nazi. Sorry, my link had multiple sources, and I provided it 2 different ways. Cope harder.

You’re right, it’s not about the grammar—it’s about the fact that you’re citing a graph that looks like a EKG of a caffeine overdose. ​"I have cited exactly zero vibes." ​Correct. You’ve also cited exactly zero sources. At least "vibes" have a mood; these lines just have an identity crisis.