Alex Perring

2.9K posts

Alex Perring

Alex Perring

@Al_Perring

ESOL, Anthropology and left wing politics.

Entrou em Mayıs 2009
700 Seguindo134 Seguidores
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@drumm_colin @AlexanderJBoyd It can come accross that way. I may be wrong, so I am not going to assume your reply "proves" my point, though tempting to do so. It's not productive. But often I feel when witnessing discussions around you there is a lot of taking through people. different frameworks clashing.
English
0
0
0
3
drumm colin (lexington)
drumm colin (lexington)@drumm_colin·
Suspect many mistake what I mean by "power." I don't mean force or violence - nearly the opposite. Real power is almost entirely held in reserve. It's pure potential. That means that real power can be incredibly gentle.
drumm colin (lexington)@drumm_colin

What makes sex sexy is that it's an open ended negotiation of a power relationship that hasn't yet been fully decided about where exactly things will settle. That's also why it's difficult to maintain excitement in long term relationships where the settling has already occurred.

English
8
9
234
25.9K
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@drumm_colin @AlexanderJBoyd Rather than to try to dig deeper and understand, not that you are compelled to have that curiousity. You seem to dismiss and characature. So within that context it logical that sex and intimacy has the framework you give it. But I dont know if you can fully unverisalise it.
English
0
0
0
7
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@drumm_colin @AlexanderJBoyd That is presumptive. For me power is always relational. The idea of becoming more powerful is a relational thing, how I view it. So its it odd to use it as a desire in a relationship to me. The sesking to dominate. But then this comment is a clumsy attempt at precisely that.
English
2
0
0
12
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@AlexanderJBoyd @drumm_colin Asymmetry is normal, but balance is the aim. But it feels reductive to see intimate relationships through the prism of power. All relations have it. When it comes to sex, while dynamics are fun to play with (even in vanilla) its in form of ritualised temporal play.
English
0
0
0
10
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@AlexanderJBoyd @drumm_colin To a degree intimacy is about allowing someone power over you through vulnerability, so I get it. But why do you respond by becoming more powerful? That seems competitive and a barrier to intimacy. An attempt to control vunerability?
English
2
0
0
11
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Ahh no my bad he is in the team of the tournament, seemed strange. Fun little toy that!
English
1
0
0
11
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z sofascore does!! Zidane is rated highly in 1998, but isnt in the team of the tournament due to limited games but the final and vs italy put him high. In 2006 he rated 30th. Cool that sofascore did that! But I also wouldnt take the rating too seriously! #id:1151" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">sofascore.com/tournament/foo…
English
2
0
0
19
Rob Fielder
Rob Fielder@ademir2z·
Zidane’s a player where I have a strong opinion so different to most people that I sometimes doubt myself so I often watch clips like this when people post them. He doesn’t create one clear cut chance in this game.
ً@FL4_FCBM

🫡

English
77
27
343
107.6K
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Its the players who played analysing their victory in the cup its complementary to zidane. Its just to try and give you a vibe to what it was back then. The 98 stuff is very well estabished. The lack of nuance, and reverting to he was super amazing, undermines your arguement.
English
1
0
0
17
🏴🏴 🏴 🏴🏴 🏴
@Al_Perring @ademir2z I won’t read a post from 2018, it’s simply revisionism. Show me an article from 1998, match to match analysis. That would be more trusted than this. Anything beyond is revisionism
English
2
0
2
19
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Zidane was like that. A big reason he didn't win more ballon d'ors (only in the top 3 three times I believe) despite clearly being the best footballer in terms of ability. He has benefited from the fact back then less games were fully shown.
English
1
0
0
9
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Because consistency and peak arw different concepts that mean different thing. Being a Madrid fan in the 2000s and a Juventus fan in the 90s you would see a fair amount of inconsistency. He could be invisible, or just have a few moments. Or he could completely dominate a game.
English
2
0
0
14
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z These are decontextualised clips but also underperforming doesnt not mean bad. Some of the players on that tournament knew zidane was underperforming. Guivarc'h: "Until the final, it is true that he hadn't been at his total best in the tournament." espn.com/soccer/story/_…
English
1
0
0
39
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Yes because scoring is not the principle role of a midfielder. Contemporarily to zidane I would say Nedved, Gerrard, Lampard, Scholes and Seedorf were all remarkably consistent players in a more attacking roles. None close to as good as zidane mind.
English
1
0
0
18
🏴🏴 🏴 🏴🏴 🏴
@Al_Perring @ademir2z What does consistent midfielder mean? I am sure the guys you are talking about never scored in big games or finals lol So it’s easy for u to judge them and say they are consistent because they never reached the same peak as Zidane
English
1
0
1
7
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Rather than going tit for tat. Watch the games. They are widely available online these days.
English
1
0
0
14
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z No. He was widely considered to have been underperfoming. The french media were quite critical. It didnt matter though. He won france their first world cup. Thruam was frances best player that tournament. Even without that crazy game against croatia.
English
2
0
0
21
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z Not really. Plenty of very consistent midfielders. Though number 10 is a role that can be inconsistent. It would be very strange for someone as good as Zidane to be benched. We are talking about an extremely high water mark! Gerrard is inferior but was also never benched!
English
1
0
0
13
🏴🏴 🏴 🏴🏴 🏴
@Al_Perring @ademir2z Like I said. His hot or cold is still better than any midfielder in history Every passes go through him, from the build up, orchestration, link up play and he did that consistently. There was no time he got benched for being poor, so ur definition of being consistent is flawed
English
1
0
1
9
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z 1998 is also a great example. He was fine before the final but largly underperfomed, but showed up when it mattered in the final. There is a reason in 98 he wasn't in the top three for the golden ball. Euro 2000 was probably his best tournament.
English
1
0
0
38
Alex Perring
Alex Perring@Al_Perring·
@ymxljf @ademir2z No it wasnt. What he did against brazil was incredible. He was good against Spain and Portugal too, though I thought Spain were unlucky to lose. In the group stages he was poor though, france were lucky to get through. Blth for Juve and Real Madrid he would blow hot and cold.
English
1
0
0
68