Matt

🇺🇸🇮🇷 JOE KENT’S RESIGNATION DUE TO THE IRAN WAR SHOWS WHAT PEOPLE THINK! Less than 7 hours and: - 57 million views - 172k shares - 550k likes

Hastily invites dispatcher to Signal.

Rogan: Nothing seems stable. Everywhere in the world seems fucked right now. In all my years, this seems the most unstable, globally.

For three years we’ve heard the same line repeated over and over by the house defendants, John O’Keefe was struck by Karen's suv But every once in a while you look at a piece of evidence and you have to stop and ask a very simple question that somehow nobody in seems interested in asking. These are the photos of the sweatshirt John O’Keefe was wearing that night. Now remember what we were told. According to MSP Michael Proctor John’s clothing at the hospital was saturated with blood and vomit. Not a little blood. Not a few stains. Saturated. That’s the word used. Now let’s apply a little common sense. John had a laceration to the back of his head. Anyone who has ever seen a head injury especially playing hockey, knows one thing and that is head wounds bleed a lot. A lot. So if someone has a bleeding head wound and they are lying on their back in the snow what should happen? The blood should soak into the hood, saturate the upper neck area, pool under the back of the head, freeze or soak into the snow beneath them That’s basic gravity. Blood runs downhill. Now look at his hoodie. Where is the blood on the hood? Where is the heavy saturation around the neckline where the wound would have been directly touching the fabric? Instead, what do we see? What appears to be blood that traveled downward along the back panel of the sweatshirt. Not pooled around the hood. Not concentrated where the wound supposedly was. It looks like blood running down the shirt. Which raises a very uncomfortable but very logical question. How does blood from the back of someone’s head run down their back if they were supposedly lying flat on frozen ground? Because if John had been lying there bleeding heavily from the back of his head, the hood would likely be the most saturated part of the garment. But it isn’t. The staining pattern instead looks more consistent with gravity pulling blood downward along the fabric just like blood on a hockey shirt after a fight! And gravity only works that way if the person is upright… or at least not lying flat on their back. Now before the usual crowd starts screaming that this is “conspiracy talk,” let’s be very clear. Nobody is claiming this hoodie by itself proves what happened. But it absolutely raises a question that should have been examined carefully by investigators. Because if the clothing pattern doesn’t match the supposed position of the body… then something in the timeline doesn’t line up almost as if he was dropped up somewhere. And that’s the bigger issue here. For three years the public has been told to ignore things that don’t fit neatly into the story. Ignore the missing video. The inverted video, the missing dog etc. Ignore the inconsistent testimony. Ignore the investigative problems. Ignore the evidence questions. Ignore the phone data debates. Ignore the experts. Ignore the physics. Just accept the conclusion. Evidence doesn’t care about narratives. And sometimes the most basic question is the one that matters the most. So I’ll ask it again. If John O’Keefe had a bleeding head wound and was lying on his back in the snow… why isn’t the hood of this sweatshirt soaked in blood? Three years later and somehow that question still hasn’t been answered. And until it is… people are going to keep asking it. Because justice for John O’Keefe shouldn’t depend on everyone agreeing to stop noticing things that don’t make sense.

There are two kinds of leftists: Those who loudly and publicly cheered for the 10/7 massacre, and those who quietly and discreetly cheered for the 10/7 massacre.