Kim Jones

3.5K posts

Kim Jones banner
Kim Jones

Kim Jones

@Kimsfeatures

Health & lifestyle journalist for nationals. Mother of boys. Author 222 ways to trick yourself to sleep (https://t.co/O7OOnDKvBR). ❤️@AlistairHeap @kickbacktimes

Cardiff, United Kingdom Entrou em Ocak 2011
1.1K Seguindo2.7K Seguidores
Kim Jones
Kim Jones@Kimsfeatures·
@virginmedia it’s impossible to talk to a customer advisor. Instead I’m taken through options which don’t answer my question. My internet is down and I want to speak to someone about it. What number will get me through to a person
English
1
0
0
65
Kim Jones
Kim Jones@Kimsfeatures·
@British_Airways is your press office working today? Waiting for a reply from them
English
4
0
0
176
Kim Jones retweetou
David Challen
David Challen@David_Challen·
My thoughts today remain with the lives stolen from this world by yet another violent man: Carol Hunt, 61 Louise Hunt, 25 Hannah Hunt, 28 We must name it, again and again: Male violence against women and girls. This has to stop.
David Challen tweet media
English
115
3K
16.5K
421.4K
Kim Jones retweetou
Rory Cellan-Jones
Rory Cellan-Jones@ruskin147·
I endorse Nick’s message - if you want to understand this terrible scandal you need to read this book
Nick Wallis@nickwallis

Hi for those of you who might be new-ish to the #PostOfficeScandal could I possibly recommend my book? Currently lurking in the low three-thousands in the Amazon charts but still sporting five full stars after more than 1000 reviews. It's technically at 4.8/5. It briefly went down to 4.5 stars after it started aggregating at 4.7/5, but a recent run of 5-star ratings got it back up to 4.8/5 which re-lit the second bit of the 5th star. Not that I've been paying that much attention (ahem). ANYWAY, please do buy my book. Amazon are selling the paperback lower than the RRP. it will be in your hands tomorrow. Also I think it's only going for 99p on Kindle which from a royalty perspective is not literally giving it away, it's actually giving it away. If you don't want to send Dave Amazon your money, please do order it direct from the publishers (Bath Publishing) rather than anywhere else as they deserve the cash. And if you buy my #DeppvHeardtheunrealstory book (currently celebrating its one year anniversary with far fewer stars because a bunch of Depponauts went tonto on it) from them at the same time you get a 20% discount and it just about nulls out the postage. Not sure what to link to now... Amazon, I reckon: amazon.co.uk/Great-Post-Off…

English
2
37
229
57K
Kim Jones retweetou
BookTrust
BookTrust@Booktrust·
Research shows that children who read for pleasure regularly are more likely to overcome inequalities. This week only, @BigGive will match your donation so we can help twice more children develop lifelong reading habits and improve their life chances. Make it count: donate today.
English
31
25
285
1.8M
Kim Jones retweetou
Martin Lewis
Martin Lewis@MartinSLewis·
I was interested to see some on here asking "why should a rich person pay more for the same services than a poorer person?" on the back of council tax/poll tax discussions. Now of course no one likes tax, but we need to understand it, so I wanted to bash out my quick, unpolished thoughts on tax in general. Of course tax should be minimised, spent wisely, efficiently and productively. I'm opposed to punitive taxation ie just for the sake of punishing those with more - even though it doesn't help or raise more revenue. Yet for me, tax is the cost of living in a legitimate civil society. It should pay for society's law and order, defence, hospitals, education, rubbish collection, legal aid, social care for our elderly, state pensions, special ed needs, disability protection, medical care and help for those who can't help themselves and more. So it's the cost of being part of both broad national and narrow local communities - hopefully for the collective betterment of all. If you were simply to say "you only pay for what you use" that isn't tax, that's service provision. Never mind the tricky questions of how you assign the cost of things like defence or policing (some may say that view'd mean if your house burnt down the fire brigade should bill you after). As for why a rich person pays a more. Well because if you take £500/mth poll tax off someone who earns £1,000/mth it's crippling, off someone who earns £100,000/mth it's hardly noticed, and they still have far more disposable income. And so if you tax everyone an equal amount, when it has a disproportionate and more damaging effect on those with less, then you start to move people into desperate situations, which risks higher crime, less safe streets, social unrest and eventually societal breakdown. So I am generally in favour of progressive taxation, which means those say with more income , pay a reasonable higher proportion of tax, because they can afford to. After all those who are more affluent, have broader shoulders, and have likely made money from society as a whole - and a well functioning society is needed for wealth creation. PS I've been deliberately unspecific here, this isn't about supporting one structure of tax, just being about tax as a concept. And equally I think tax planning is fine (ie working within the rules to minimise tax - often because you're doing something the state is trying to encourage you to do - like save in an ISA or invest or put money aside for your future)
English
771
1.1K
6.6K
1.9M