Jon Midas

These fanbase ehh😂. Can't we just enjoy football events without making it about rivalry again 🤦🏾‍♂️

FT is a cesspool of agendas and rage bait . With everyone trying to ratio opponents and ignore nuances. It makes it difficult to hold genuine level headed football conversations that doesn't spew into ridiculous takes🤦🏾‍♂️

Scenes after tonight will be heavenly! A generational successful hate watch on its way. Can't wait 😅

@qsleyy How you know you have lost the plot: When you start saying that everybody is against you😅

They said bro has completed football when they stole the World Cup along side his 8 balon dors of which 4 were rigged for him. They said he has “completed” football. So why is everything giving the insecure girlfriend vibe. Why does Sofascore have to rig ratings and stats for him? Why is Sofascore reducing Ronaldo’s goals and removing the trophy he’s won for Al Nassr? Not just Sofascore Fraudizio Romano, the so called Journalist. Why are they forcing it? To prove what? Why is Fraudizio still trying so hard to always put Ronaldo out there negatively? Why are they still feeling insecure? I thought he “completed” football so why does all this matter? They can’t fool us with this demonic PR and rigging. We know the GOAT.

Random thoughts: The ability to grow your finances through investments must first be built on the foundation financial discipline. If you like, read all the books on investments you like, if you don't have the discipline of financial prudence, you'll end up lesser than you should in comparison to the knowledge you have. Infact a person who only knows how to save money, might end up better than you who invests everywhere but also spends lavishly, cos at the end it'll catch up.

... But he refused to sin, and this is exactly what made him different from other humans and made him a perfect sacrifice for Sins. Now to answer your question, if Jesus lived for 10,000 years, this would mean he was above human limitations, and so he couldn't claim to be HUMAN, and then this would negate the work he came to do, because the requirements of sin needed a HUMAN to die for HUMANS. And this my friend is why JESUS couldn't have lived for 10,000 years as you asked.

I'm going to try to answer a few questions here and let it be (Long read) Now someone can appear to you and tell you about himself, and supernaturally make you believe what he's saying, because he's all powerful, but that person will be a manipulator, and God is not a manipulator. You see, the appearance of a supernatural being flying around with some supernatural powers will definitely convince people to believe what he's saying because of what they see, not necessarily because they know him, but that will defeat the whole purpose of free will, God wants people to come to him because of what they know about him, not ONLY because of what they have seen him do. So God's plan was that through a combination of the knowledge of his love, his personality and his abilities, knowledge built over a long period of time people will decide to accept him. It's like a lady choosing you either because she knows you, and has known you for a long time (and all you represent) or choosing to accept you because of your doings in a few weeks of meeting you. So when Jesus is born to the Jews, it's not a problem of limitation, it's about choice. God coming to people who had known him all their lives. Now someone said, why didn't he stay in Israel why spread this knowledge to everyone since he only appeared to Israel? Let me answer that: From the beginning, God's plan had always been to fill the earth with his knowledge (if you look at all his conversations with Abraham "In you all the nations of the earth will be blessed"), But God is also a God of process, if you study God well, you'll understand that anything tangible that God does starts small and grows bigger with time, for instance, he created a man and woman, He could have created 10 men and women. And this is a principle God has all through scriptures, he starts with one person or a small group of persons and expands, another example to look at his how Jesus told 12 disciples to make disciples of all Nations. Now another person asked, why didn't he live for 10,000 years to spread his message? Let me answer that (It's going to be a long answer so please bear with me) The Bible tells us that the wages of sin is death: Meaning if a Human sins, the Human has to die, this is the requirements of sin. This is ONE of the reasons that the death of Goats, bulls etc, in the Old testament couldn't fully clear them of sins, because a HUMAN had to pay for his own Sins. This however this gives us a very important precedent, that it's possible for the sins of a person to be paid for by another entity, however the failure of Bulls and Goats to fully clear them of their sins (because they had to do this yearly) shows us that the entity that would clear people of sin had to be of a higher repute than Goats or Bulls. So the only way a HIMAN could be cleared of Sin, was by the death of a HUMAN. Now anyone could pay for the sins of anyone, but there was a small caveat: for anyone to be qualified to pay for the sins of anyone, he himself couldn't be a sinner, else it defeats the whole purpose of paying for sins. It's like going to beg for a student not to be flogged, but the teacher is also looking to flog you for a crime you committed before. But we know that it's impossible for anyone to claim not to have sinned, infact you probably sin every hour without knowing. This means nobody would have been able to pay for sins because no one was sinless. Now enters JESUS, God knew that the only way he could control the urges of a HUMAN so he could be sinless was if that HUMAN was Himself (Because doesn't control people). It's like when they say, "If you want something done, do it yourself" And this is why GOD came as a HUMAN - THE MAN JESUS. Jesus was a Man like us, subject to human frailties as us, he could die, he could fall sick and VERY IMPORTANTLY "HE COULD SIN", But he choose not to Sin. And this is where people get it wrong - people assume JESUS was above Sin, NO, JESUS could sin....

It’s even more damning that after Jesus Christ allegedly resurrected, he hung around for 40days… but all of his appearances were only within Jerusalem and Galilee.… imagine the creator of the whole universe claiming to die for the whole world.. hung around for 40 days after resurrection but only appear within a very tiny geographical location..he was even eating bread and fish with his disciples 😅 this was the perfect moment to appear to cultures all over the world and introduce himself and what he’s all about…African societies ,Australian aboriginals,south and north American cultures etc So very valid tweets like the one I’m quoting wouldn’t exist… and no one would have excuses. But nah .. he’d rather eat fish and bread in Galilee .. while Christianity spread into the Americas and Africa through colonialism, slavery ,wars and death. Easy to call bullshit on the whole story.

@Charlzzwolf @_OKJ__ With this logic, if I start something in Nigeria and I take time to build a strong presence in Nigeria, but because I couldn't travel to other countries, then what I built should only remain in Nigeria.

@_OKJ__ @MidasJon Let me. @MidasJon okay, yes he is not suppose to appear to random people. FINE! Then why can’t the religion remain in the country he spent 33 years with? Why then did it had to be spread (by colonialism), in counties of “random people”. An all-knowing god fa

@_OKJ__ Like I said, I know your type. Stupidity trying hard to look wise. Enjoy sha, I know it's Elon's money you're looking for, and I'm glad you're using JESUS to get your daily bread, cos imagine how hungry you'll be if you didn't have JESUS to talk about

@MidasJon Not even worth responding to 😅.. just ad hominems and vibes whilst saying complete nonsense.

@Rmadonyfc_ Bro, this league still belongs to you?🌚

Anyone who watches Laliga this season knows this league belongs to Real Madrid. We have beaten our only threat Atletico, and Barcelona will have to go to Metropolitano stadium to face an angry Lookman 😂

@Rmadonyfc_ 🚶🏾‍♂️

@Rmadonyfc_ This is what I love about a few good performances; it feeds your delusion until reality sets in. Don't worry, you won't even last till you get to Barcelona. You want to win the league with Arbeola, laughable 😅. I'll be here when you turn on Him.

@GloriousGod01 Are we not going to address the Elephant in the room? "The Police"?

A Yahoo boy successfully defrauded his foreign client of $80,000. He needed an account to receive the money, so he reached out to an Aza man. The Aza man received the funds but turned around and told him the account was frozen and the money was gone. The Yahoo boy knew it was a lie. He brought the police to arrest the Aza man, but the family quickly bailed him out for 1 million naira. Now he has hired cultists to hunt the Aza man down, and the guy has been on the run ever since. Here is my question: Why are Yahoo boys so enraged when someone steals from them, yet they steal from others without blinking? This man defrauded someone abroad. Another person turned around and did the same thing to him, and now he is ready to k*ll over it. Above all, love God.

@_monsonline @BouafifNour Exactly Chief. They're both good players, but Oshimen offers us more as a team.

@MidasJon @BouafifNour Perfect I totally agree. Osimhen would be the better signing for me too. One thing I like you stating is that Alvarez would also be a floor raiser. many people still feel Alvarez won’t be any different from Ferran Torres. They both improve us but I feel Osimhen will offer more

Every time I talk about preferring a more traditional striker like Osimhen over someone like Álvarez, I see a lot of people bring up Álvarez’s ability to play as a lone striker for Argentina. So I want to clarify something and explain my view of this in details: My issue with Álvarez is not his ability to play as a lone striker, it’s his profile as a striker and how it fits into Flick’s system. Hansi Flick’s system relies heavily on having a constant presence inside the box. His attacking structure is built on verticality, width, and quick execution in the final third. For that to work, you need a striker who is always occupying central spaces, pinning center-backs, and ready to finish moves. That’s exactly what profiles like Osimhen or Lewandowski provide. Beyond just presence, a pure number 9 acts as a fixed reference point. He gives clarity to attacking patterns and ensures there’s always someone in the box at the decisive moment. In contrast, a striker like Álvarez tends to drop deep a lot. While that can be useful in certain systems, it often removes that focal point and leaves the box empty when it matters most. This becomes even more of an issue in Flick’s preferred 4-2-3-1. In that setup, you already have a natural number 10 operating between the lines. If the striker also drops into those same spaces, you create positional redundancy and congestion in central areas. A false 9 profile works much better in a 4-3-3, where the interiors stay slightly deeper and wider, allowing the striker to link play without overcrowding zones. But in a 4-2-3-1, the striker’s role is different, he needs to stretch the last line and occupy the box, not replicate the playmaking functions already covered behind him.

Definitely Alvarez might be better at link up play than Oshimen, but we already have players good at link up play who we can take advantage of. So I'll rather we sign Oshimen who'd offer us what we don't have than sign Alvarez to do what we can already do even though he might obviously make it better. That's what I'm saying. In this team Alvarez will be a floor raiser, Oshimen will be a ceiling raiser.

@MidasJon @BouafifNour One of the best and truthful analysis I’ve read so far concerning their differences. However I feel in games where the opposition presses high, Alvarez is better for link up play similar to how dembele or Kane play due to high technical ability and positional versatility

@mrbayoa1 Have you heard from Calafiori recently?🌚

An Arsenal player will never twerk for another club while playing for Arsenal, this small clubs are really suffering in the hands of Barcelona and Real Madrid 😂😂😂😂

@ShafinEmran @BouafifNour I'm not sure you actually understand what ball holding is in this context. If not you won't compare Alvarez to Kane

@MidasJon @BouafifNour Bro you should watch his ball holding abilities then. It’s much similar to Harry Kane but the only difference is Harry Kane is good at Aerials.

@ShafinEmran @BouafifNour Alvarez will hold the ball? Really Alvarez? With which body? Do you know why it's physically dominant players that are given this responsibility? So you think Alvarez would have been able to do it against Dan Burn last week?

@BouafifNour After flicking came, lewa drops in the midfield to receive and hold the ball which allows the " 10 " to exploit the space lewa left behind the defense. That’s what flick will do with Alvarez. And fs Alvarez will do it 10x better

@NealGardner_ I believe you know that these sports journalist are very good at Cherry picking people's words. I won't be surprised if he said many things and these guys just picked certain words to push a narrative. They did that with Lamine last season.

While I think his performances have justified him playing more minutes, saying this publicly just isn’t the right way, and I’m pretty sure Flick won’t appreciate it. It’s very difficult when you’re “competing” with the best itw. 🤷‍♂️