OnceHoly
7.8K posts

OnceHoly
@Once_Holy
Web3 | Metaverse | Crypto | NFT Degen 🚀🔥💯 Moon or rekt !
Australia Entrou em Haziran 2021
1.3K Seguindo5.6K Seguidores

@Megatron_ron Enjoy it while it last because once this is complete and has been tested successfully…. North Korea won’t last long


English
OnceHoly retweetou
OnceHoly retweetou
OnceHoly retweetou

Hey @AGPamBondi....This you hangin' out with Keith Frankel? The same Keith Frankel who's referenced in the Epstein files talking with Jeffrey Epstein about "body boxes" on 2/10/2010?
The same Keith Frankel who's family runs a "children's home" that "rescues" children from Ukraine? The same Ukraine referenced in the files as being a hot bed for child sex trafficking?
Do the Epstein victims you claim to represent know that you're buddies with one of their abusers?
I do.


English

Every conclusion and opinion, yours and mine, is necessarily based on what is currently being presented in the news and on social media. We’re each entitled to interpret that information and form our own views.
I shared the following elsewhere, and it seems equally relevant here:
“That’s difficult to reconcile with the broader cultural reality of the time. Teen sexual themes were mainstream in film and media, widely consumed by adolescents, often with parental awareness or approval.”
English

BREAKING: Multiple Epstein victims tell NBC News that Pam Bondi intentionally un-redacted their names and other victims' names as a way to threaten them into silence!
“I think we all realize now that [the DOJ] really wanted to silence us, and [they] thought that [they] could scare us by putting our names out there.”
“It had a list of victims, and one was redacted. That makes no sense. This is a list of victims. That is INTENTIONAL!”
This is an impeachable offense. Pam Bondi needs to be impeached immediately!
English

@Coinvo Virginia was a known liar. She has lied about nearly everything she has said about Epstein. She lied about getting hit by a bus.. its absolutely disgusting that people praise this child predator
English

@RepThomasMassie @brodie2318008 @HasanKhxnx Now, beg us for money… right. That’s next isn’t it? Beg for money.
English

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?”
Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks.
The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp.
Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept!
The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote.
Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this.
Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic.
The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package.
There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next.
This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL.
The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced.
The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act.
The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along.
If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.


English

He deserved it, you Epstein loons are a cult, no one fucking cares, and most of the shit in "the Epstein files" are emails and calls made from fake people just trying to get on record. Most of the stories on X are made up, AI pics and videos from S&M movies claiming it's Epstein videos. Now you have these lunatics chasing people like a professor over the dumb ass conspiracy theories, he deserved it !
English

Grace Tame's speech was one of the most disturbingly accurate impersonations of Hitler I've ever seen. No hyperbole. The unhinged rage, the psychotic hate and, of course, the call for the extermination of the Jews. Funny how those who claim to hate Nazis act exactly like them
Buntz#23..👊👊👊@Bergermeister23
Different times. Same old hatred.
English

@Toffeehun @BubbaLinks @WarMonitors Yes theres photo proof the Idf buried the 15 medical workers after killing them. You're either unimformed or a lier
English

@BubbaLinks @WarMonitors So you have proof right? From the Hamas terrorist organisation. I’d like to see what other countries do when missiles are launched from hospitals,schools,UN facilities,residential populations.The IDF have thrown thousands of leaflets to warn people . No other army does this
English

@MaxNordau @CarriePrejean1 @DanPatrick Bro she Christian. A photo with Muslims doesn't prove much. You sound like a Zionist
English

@CarriePrejean1 @DanPatrick You want to force the White House to issue an official statement as a publicity stunt for you and your Islamic supremacist handlers.

English

Laura, you’ve spent the last 48 hours pretending to be the White House spokesperson. I want to know, who’s lying? You or Dan? @DanPatrick said that it was his decision to remove me from President Trump’s commission, Now, you’re saying, it was at the direction of the White House?
Let’s be clear: President Donald J. Trump has never needed a middleman with no credibility like you, to say “You’re fired.” If I was really removed, we’d hear it from the President himself.
The President speak for himself. Until I receive written notice from @POTUS, this is just an attack on a Catholic woman by atheist Zionist supremacists, and politicians who are speaking on behalf of AIPAC pressure. MAGA supporters are not happy about it either.
Prove your access Laura, I’ll wait…
In the meantime, I’ll be praying for your conversion to Christ 🙏🏽
#ChristisKing
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer
NEW: I can confirm that the White House directed @DanPatrick to remove @CarriePrejean1 from the White House Religious Liberty Commission. Dan Patrick was asked by the White House to remove her. So no, @CarriePrejean1, you are wrong. Dan Patrick does have the authority to remove you because he was instructed to do so as the head of the committee by the Trump White House. You’re fired. Per orders from the TRUMP WHITE HOUSE. The White House confirmed this to me.
English





















