Just Samuel

573 posts

Just Samuel banner
Just Samuel

Just Samuel

@SCrypt22

The guy who works in crypto and actually uses AI to do his job better.

Singapore Entrou em Mayıs 2021
500 Seguindo2.1K Seguidores
Just Samuel retweetou
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Personal update: I've joined Anthropic. I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D. I remain deeply passionate about education and plan to resume my work on it in time.
English
7.9K
11.1K
149K
27.1M
Just Samuel retweetou
OpenAI
OpenAI@OpenAI·
You've been asking for this one... Now in preview: Codex in the ChatGPT mobile app. Start new work, review outputs, steer execution, and approve next steps, all from the ChatGPT mobile app. Codex will keep running on your laptop, Mac mini, or devbox.
English
1.7K
2.6K
22K
4.7M
tara_
tara_@TechByTaraa·
why is everyone in tech suddenly switching from Claude to gpt 5.5?
tara_ tweet media
English
309
24
1K
571.4K
Just Samuel
Just Samuel@SCrypt22·
Open-source is the future
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy

CapCut just locked basic features behind a paywall and started training their AI on every video their users edited. A group of developers got mad enough to clone the entire thing from scratch and put it on GitHub for free. It's called OpenCut. 45,800 stars in under a year. Here's why every CapCut user is quietly migrating. → Timeline-based editing with multi-track support → Real-time preview without rendering first → No watermarks on any export, ever → No subscriptions, no premium tier, no locked features → Works on web, desktop, and mobile from the same codebase → Your videos never leave your device, the editor runs in your browser → MIT License, so anyone can fork it and ship their own version CapCut started free. Then they paywalled basic transitions. Then they paywalled higher export resolutions. Then they started slapping watermarks on free user exports. Then ByteDance started using user content to train their AI models. The pattern every free creative tool follows. OpenCut breaks the pattern by being unable to do that. The repo is MIT licensed, which means nobody can ever add a paywall, force an account, or train AI on your projects. If the maintainers tried, someone would fork it within 48 hours and ship the same product without the changes. The features that put it ahead of CapCut already: → Privacy-first architecture, video processing happens locally → No CapCut account required, no Apple ID, no Google sign in → Open source codebase you can audit line by line → 90+ contributors actively shipping features every week → Web version works on Chromebooks, Linux, anything with a browser → Anonymous analytics only, no behavioral tracking, no fingerprinting The numbers that explain why it's blowing up: → 45,800 GitHub stars → 4,700 forks (developers betting on the codebase) → 1,280 commits in active development → 90+ contributors from around the world → Backed by Vercel and fal.ai for OSS infrastructure The most uncomfortable truth for CapCut: their entire moat was being free. The moment a free, open-source alternative caught up, the moat disappeared. OpenCut has caught up. MIT License. 100% Open Source. Free forever.

English
0
0
0
9
Nate Herk
Nate Herk@nateherk·
Hermes actually is the real deal. I just dropped a one hour course on it. All the way from setting one up to understanding how to build an army of them. Give this a read.
Nate Herk@nateherk

x.com/i/article/2053…

English
79
267
2.8K
333.7K
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
ChatGPT feels very 'switched on' now
English
1.2K
182
5.9K
543.8K
Just Samuel
Just Samuel@SCrypt22·
@AlexFinn since i'm using Openclaw, would likely lean towards more Codex usage instead of Claude Code. /goal is fun
English
0
0
0
665
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
This is WILD Anthropic over the last few months has been sputtering. Limits continuously going down. Claude Code being taken out of the pro plan. Models feeling dumber Elon just bailed them out. Gave them access to the world's biggest super compute cluster. Now their 5 hour limits are significantly higher, have no more peak hour reductions, and substantially increased API rate limits. Anthropic's compute crunch was the achilles heal to their entire company. Their sentiment has tanked because of it. Elon fixed that with one single deal. Codex has been on a generational run the last couple months. Claude Code has been tanking for lottery picks and now they just got Wembanyama thanks to Elon I'm really hoping this is the end of a long run of silent limit reductions and poor communication from Anthropic. Claude Code at its peak was legendary.
Claude@claudeai

We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity. This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.

English
201
101
2K
250.2K
Rohan Varma
Rohan Varma@TheRohanVarma·
Today I’m attempting to hit the 5-hour limit on the Codex $100 Pro plan. The method: build a MapleStory-like game from scratch. 30 minutes in, I already have a working game with sprites, maps, and assets generated with Imagegen. Unfortunately, I’ve only used 5% of the limit so far. At this pace, I may need to start building RuneScape in parallel just to make a dent 😬
Rohan Varma tweet media
English
154
58
1.4K
215.2K
Yash
Yash@yashhq_22·
As a solo founder, what do you build first? - the product - the audience
English
409
10
258
23.1K
Just Samuel
Just Samuel@SCrypt22·
Read finish the book. Find it very inspiring. Some key things are on my head even until now 1. Hire slow, fire quickly 2. Culture is built by examples of the leader 3. Meeting with agenda always. Skip intro meetings 4. Life isnt always upward path, face challenges with dignity is how we grow. 5. Always communicate with the community to build trust 6. Performance is measured by results, not time spent 7. Committed people are passionate, respond promptly, even outside regular hours
English
0
0
1
236
Yash
Yash@yashhq_22·
Solo founders, which model are you using for vibe coding? - gpt 5.5 - opus 4.7 - gemini 3.1
English
279
3
209
26.2K
Just Samuel
Just Samuel@SCrypt22·
People are quick to complain about open source projects, but slow to appreciate the builders behind them. @openclaw is still a baby. It will have bugs, rough edges, and missing pieces, that’s normal. But it is also opening up new possibilities for developers and the future of software tooling. Instead of dismissing it too early, maybe give the team a little more patience, feedback, and support. Open source grows because people build, test, break, improve, and contribute not because everyone sits on the sidelines throwing stones.
English
0
0
0
17
Just Samuel
Just Samuel@SCrypt22·
@vincent_koc is this function available globally or just certain country? I can't seem to use this.
English
0
0
0
201
Vincent Koc
Vincent Koc@vincent_koc·
I've been using /goal for ~3 days on OpenClaw. - 13 runs. - Gazillion tokens. - Many, many PRs. The lesson isn't "i used /goal a lot." it's that /goal is not a "do my ticket" button. It's a constraint workflow. I want a keep the ship on course. A thread on what actually works 🧵
Vincent Koc tweet media
English
47
76
1.1K
287.9K
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
2026 and onwards is truly the age of open source
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

DocuSign Personal: $10 to $15 per month. DocuSign Standard: $25 to $45 per user per month. DocuSign Business Pro: $40 to $65 per user per month. A 10-person team on Business Pro pays $4,800 to $7,800 a year. To put signatures on PDFs. A team of 50 pays $24,000 to $39,000 a year. And there is a 100-envelopes-per-year cap on most plans. Send more contracts and you pay extra. Need SMS delivery? $0.40 per send. Need ID verification? $2.50 per attempt. Need premium support? $5,000 to $50,000 per year add-on. You are rationing digital signatures in 2026. DocuSign is a $10 billion company built entirely on this pricing model. Now meet DocuSeal. A free and open source alternative to DocuSign. Created in 2023 by a Ruby developer named Alex who was simply trying to sign one document and realised every solution online was overpriced or required a subscription. Three weeks later he had a working alternative. He pushed it to GitHub under the AGPL-3.0 license. Today it has 11,800+ stars and over 1,000 forks. Bootstrapped. No VCs. No paywalls. Here is what DocuSeal does: - Upload any PDF and turn it into a fillable, signable form - Drag and drop signature fields, dates, checkboxes, file uploads, and 13 field types - Send to multiple signers with custom signing order - Automated email reminders - Mobile signing on any device - PDF signature verification built in - Audit trail for every document - Bulk send and templates - Full API access - Self-host with one Docker command Here is what DocuSeal costs: Zero. Forever. Unlimited documents. Unlimited signers. Unlimited storage. DocuSign limits envelopes. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges per SMS. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges for ID checks. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign sees your contracts on their servers. DocuSeal doesn't. Here is the wildest part: The median DocuSign contract per Vendr is $17,250 per year. One Reddit thread has people saying "they want me to pay $4.80 per e-signature." Self-host DocuSeal on a $5 cloud server and a 50-person team can sign as many contracts as they want without paying a single dollar. Your contracts never leave your server. Your client lists. Your NDAs. Your employment agreements. None of it touches a third-party company. For individuals who only sign a few contracts a year, you save $180. For small teams of 10, you save up to $7,800 a year. For a 50-person company, you save up to $39,000 a year. Your documents. Your signatures. Your server. 100% Open Source. (Link in the comments)

English
90
124
1.7K
552.8K
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
GBrain v0.26.3 now has a full MCP oAuth panel that you can use to control which clients (Claude Code, Cowork, ChatGPT or Perplexity Computer) get access to your brain, with full invalidation and logs
Garry Tan tweet media
English
34
21
289
19.8K