Kassu

2.2K posts

Kassu banner
Kassu

Kassu

@SolKasu

🇪🇹. Software. Liverpool FC.

Entrou em Mart 2024
107 Seguindo30 Seguidores
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@doin_bitss Corruption would rather let us live in mud than let this happen
English
0
0
0
13
Kassu retweetou
In A Nutshell🥜
In A Nutshell🥜@Markosonke1·
On paper it sounds simple: "Let’s build one big refinery in Angola and pipe fuel across SADC" 😭 First problem: politics. Every country wants control, contracts, tenders, "their people" to benefit… suddenly the refinery budget is now feeding 10 different interests 😭 Second: corruption. Before the first pipe is even laid, half the money is already "missing", consultants are eating, tenders are inflated… by the time construction starts, the budget is finished Third: trust issues. Countries don’t even trust each other to manage electricity… now you want them to share fuel pipelines?? One dispute and someone switches off the tap 😭 Fourth: infrastructure. Some countries can’t maintain roads… now we’re talking about cross-border pipelines worth billions?? Maintenance alone would collapse It’s not that Africa CAN’T… it’s that leadership, governance and accountability are doing the opposite 😭
Nyasha@NNyashaYessur

Why can't SADC countries come together and build an Oil Refinery Plant in Angola and build pipe lines that service all these countries instead of spending millions of dollars buying fuel in the Middle East What stops Africans from doing this?.

English
58
143
465
27.3K
Kassu retweetou
i/o
i/o@avidseries·
Three surprising quotes about abortion by pro-choice intellectual Camille Paglia. “Feminism inextricably identified itself with abortion—with termination of life rather than fertility.” “In America, we treat college students like children, children like infants, and fetuses like trash.” “Contemporary American feminism has distorted and desensitized itself by its inability or refusal to recognize the ethical weight of the pro-life position, which it routinely mischaracterizes as anti-woman."
English
57
225
2K
51.4K
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@MustardX19 When in the US: complain about capitalism and the West. When Deported: cry as if one is dead/finished.
English
0
0
1
418
BunaBoy ™
BunaBoy ™@MustardX19·
Deported ማለት ወደ ሀገር መመለስ ነው ኣ? ለምንድነው የሞተ ያስመሰላችሁት?
AM
10
1
56
6.6K
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@Y_didy_7 It's funny seeing theatrical kids in politics.
English
0
0
0
30
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@kkKelechi_ LKY is the exception, not the norm. I dont understand the fetish some have about dictators. Chances are you get more Idi Amin than Lee Kuan Yew.
English
1
0
3
837
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@TheodrosKassa Especially Eritrean defending the regime while enjoying freedom of the West.
English
0
0
2
61
Teddy Kassa 🇪🇹 🇺🇸
Teddy Kassa 🇪🇹 🇺🇸@TheodrosKassa·
One thing I’ve noticed is that many people leave socialist countries in search of better opportunities in capitalist countries…..yet some still spend their time complaining about the system. At some point, we have to look at ourselves, not just the system. Especially as men, we’re meant to face challenges, adapt, and make things work….not sit back and complain. ባጭሩ አልቃሾች አንሁን።
English
8
2
19
2.1K
Kassu retweetou
Iñigo San Millán
Iñigo San Millán@doctorinigo·
For decades, peer review has been treated as the gold standard of scientific validation. Yet many scientists know the reality: the system is far from perfect. Peer review is broken and sometimes even corrupted. The process can be slow, inconsistent, and vulnerable to bias. Reviewers are sometimes asked to judge work outside their true expertise. In other cases, they may be evaluating ideas that challenge the very paradigm in which they were trained. And occasionally, reviewers are simply competitors. Ironically, the most prestigious journals can also be the most conservative. Truly new ideas are often met with skepticism, while safer work that fits the current narrative moves more easily through the system. Increasingly, papers are judged less by the originality of the idea and more by the volume of data, the sophistication of statistics, and the beauty of the figures. Science risks becoming data-rich but idea-poor. But there is an important reality to remember: journals do not ultimately decide the impact of scientific work. Impact is decided later, by the community. By the scientists who read it, test it, debate it, and cite it. In the end, citations and ideas determine the legacy of a paper, not the impact factor of the journal that first published it. Science has always advanced by questioning assumptions. Perhaps it is time we also question the system that filters scientific ideas.
Iñigo San Millán tweet media
English
139
1K
2.8K
242K
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@EKG_T9 This gets you respect from people you don't want to be around.
English
1
0
2
179
EKG
EKG@EKG_T9·
The only way to get respect in this country to be extremely mean to people. Genuinely being nice doesn't work. People think you are weak for it.
English
4
3
53
2K
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@sir_benedictx UN doesn't long for peace. They have a preference as anyone, and they long for their side.
English
0
0
0
51
Bereketeab
Bereketeab@sir_benedictx·
UN longs for peace so bad but does absolutely nothing about it. I’d love to get paid for yearning too.
English
1
3
46
1.3K
Kassu retweetou
Neil Renic
Neil Renic@NC_Renic·
The journal: “your work is being cited” Me: 😃 The citation: “…as he stupidly and unattractively argues…”
English
61
1.4K
28.1K
395.7K
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@sir_benedictx Oh yes, why don't they support the regime that killed more than 30K a couple of months ago?
English
0
0
1
51
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@ec0n1st @IQTestBrain I can't believe you failed to account for the second X. Here: (150-X)+(140-X) =180 290-2X=180 -2X=180-290 X=55 Your mistake is here : 150+140-X, this counts only one X.
English
1
0
0
26
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@hell_line0 You can't help yourself not to say something against Trump even when talking about Camcer and vaccines? This is mental illness. How about preventing Learing Centers?
English
0
0
0
7
Maryam
Maryam@hell_line0·
Breast cancer survival rate in 1920: 5% Breast cancer survival rate in 1960: 25% Breast cancer survival rate in 1990: 64-80% Breast cancer survival rate in 2025: 91% Stage IV 5 year survival rate in 2025: 28-32% RESEARCH (not ivermectin) got us this far, but you know what’s next? Vaccines for breast cancer and BRCA mutations. Better treatments for stage IV. With the money we’re spending on an illegal war, we could have focused on this research and saved lives. Americans deserve better
English
127
800
13.2K
1.9M
Kassu
Kassu@SolKasu·
@ec0n1st I don't agree with this. How tf is Firefox fav browser for Eritrea? Do they even have internet? Mine, Brave, which is chromium based.
English
0
0
0
28