SolarFan

@MarcoRPi1 All of them

I legit don't know what supercharger to post tomorrow. help

@wholemars Someone at @Tesla seriously messed up by putting that fsd transfer language in there to begin with. They must have severely underestimated demand.

Sad to see so many fans trashing Tesla with such extreme language. LIARS!!! PATHETIC!!! And if you aren’t as furious and angry as they are they are you’re “worshipping” and saying “they can do no wrong”. Let’s get real here. They’re not liars. They offered FSD transfer to us to sell more cars this quarter, and were even gracious enough to say if we can’t deliver it in time for the end of the quarter you can still do the transfer. But what they never promised is that we’ll let you transfer FSD through the end of 2027. Who knows, maybe they will offer FSD transfer in 2027, but they did not expect a 1 year+ Cybertruck backlog when they made the FSD transfer option. They meant if your delivery slips into April and it’s Tesla’s fault you still get your transfer. And they’re still honoring that: if you get a car with an estimated delivery date this quarter you can still transfer even if the delivery date slips into April. What a lot of people are missing is that we are now in the unsupervised FSD era. Many of these one year out Cybertruck reservations will be delivered with unsupervised FSD, where Tesla takes liability for any accidents. That doesn’t work out well financially if tons of people aren’t paying for FSD on their new cars. Look, I agree. I think Tesla should honor the transfer for people who want. I would like that and maybe even use it personally. But what i’m not really a fan of is the dramatization and people acting like spoiled kids over something pretty minor. The Tesla team and the Tesla community have allowed me to make a living doing what I love. The FSD product has changed my life for the better and keeps my friends and family safe. I love Tesla and while criticism is warranted sometimes the hatred here, towards both Tesla and others in the community, is a little over the top. In a way, it has actually created a moral hazard for Tesla. If they bend to pressure with people abusing them and trashing them publicly, then people will abuse and trash them publicly any time they want a policy changed. I think respectfully asking Elon & Tesla for a policy change here would go a long way more than calling them liars and cheaters just for trying to sell cars this quarter. Wake up guys. Tesla is in trouble. Sales are down year over year. People are pulling out of EV investments around the globe. Remember when people wanted to see EVs succeed rather than just worrying about getting things without having to pay for them? Call me what you want, but i’m going to tell people how great EVs are and how much self-driving will change their life. Telling them Tesla is horrible and evil is a lie that will keep them stuck in a shitty cars. EVs are getting attacked from every angle, why do we have to join in too? Thank you to those who are supporting Tesla, EVs, and AVs during this critical time.

@garrytan @ethanagarwal @RoKhanna needs to step down immediately. He’s an embarrassment

I’ve known @Ethanagarwal for years. When he sees a problem, he’ll attack with the force of a thousand suns.  Ro Khanna has been trading stocks like Citadel while criticising innovation, hard work, and wealth creation. He’s running to the left to build his own national profile so he can run for president. He’s abandoned his responsibility to his district. I’m 100% confident that Ethan is the right man to replace Ro. I’m a supporter and contributor, and I urge you to chip in whatever you can to his campaign.

@BeatGreatFilter @elonmusk I thought it was recent change. Either way he’s said it on earnings calls. Also, if they’re that dishonest, is that really a company ppl are going to want to buy products from?

@SolarFan2 @elonmusk Always. Recently (last few years) every sale added the word "Supervised" in the description. But it's always said it will make turns and drive on its own, with your supervision. What Elon says is puffing, it makes no difference, the terms of the sales are what matters.

With the reaction to FSD transfers, how bad will it be when Tesla announces that FSD Unsupervised is a monthly subscription, even though you already own Supervised? Cause that's exactly what will happen. Elon needs 10 million FSD subs. It's the only way that occurs in time.

@BeatGreatFilter When did the terms say that? @elonmusk has repeatedly said what was paid for will be unsupervised. They’d lose a lawsuit and piss off all customers.

@SolarFan2 There's no grounds. Read the initial description when you purchased FSD. Tesla has already delivered everything. And now it's clearly labeled "Supervised" to differentiate between supervised and unsupervised, why do you think that is??!

@wholemars I really don't understand why you're defending @Tesla so much here.

@wholemars I mean they did say it was transferrable on their website and email.

You: No FSD transfer unless I take delivery by March 31?!? HOW DARE YOU!? Tesla just loves FUCKING their customers in the ASS! THIS MUST BE E FIXED! MAKE IT RIGHT! Me: *Sell my car with FSD for $3k - $4k more, given FSD package isn’t for sale anymore* *Uses the extra money for 30 - 40 months of FSD subscription* *Put the $4k in my savings account to collect interest and pay sub monthly*

@wholemars @JohnLeupp @elonmusk expected more

@JohnLeupp Whose expectations? A moron?

Insane to think they launched with 11 cars less than a year ago

@niccruzpatane I thought Outokumpu in Calvert, Alabama supplied CyberTrucks steel.

@EricETesla @SawyerMerritt did it have a steering wheel?

@SawyerMerritt Thats literally me.... Love Cybercab ♥️

Is it me, or does this Cybercab that was spotted in Palo Alto today not have a steering wheel? Hard to tell. Two things are for sure: there are no exterior mirrors, and Tesla put larger gold wheel covers on this Cybercab. You can also see the person in the car briefly shuffling papers around in the middle of the video, which means the car could be self-driving.

@wholemars @CodeWShreyans Does this chart cover Tesla's 7.8 billion miles or just the autonomous miles Tesla is doing as part of RoboTaxi?

@CodeWShreyans Tesla: 7.8 billion miles Waymo: 200 million miles

Waymo operates more rides DAILY than Tesla has operated IN TOTAL so this is insanely stupid

@TheCyberhemian @TeslaBoomerMama @elonmusk Yes, that doesn't change the FACT that Elon completely screwed over Tesla shareholders for YEARS with how he went about the Twitter purchase. Look at the Tesla stock trend if you forgot.

@SolarFan2 @TeslaBoomerMama @elonmusk Do you know how much X/twitter is worth now? The two companies with merge directly or indirecty in the future. The value creation for TSLA shareholders with be out of this world.

That's exactly true and if it comes to a merger, we need to address this. I will fight every waking minute to help make this fair. @elonmusk

@TheCyberhemian @TeslaBoomerMama @elonmusk He fucked over shareholders by selling Tesla stock to buy Twitter at a ridiculous price.

@SolarFan2 @TeslaBoomerMama @elonmusk Did what?

@TheCyberhemian @TeslaBoomerMama @elonmusk He did during the Twitter buyout

@TeslaBoomerMama @elonmusk Should be possible! Elon knows it obviously and would never fuck over the shareholders. I am sure he is working on a structure where they (we) are rewarded for our loyalty rather than punished

@grok @LimitingThe @grok How much US graphite production does the petitioners have Anovion Technologies (Sanborn, NY), Syrah Technologies LLC (Vidalia, LA), NOVONIX Anode Materials LLC (Chattanooga, TN), Epsilon Advanced Materials (Leland, NC), and SKI US, Inc. (Marietta, GA)?

These duties (93.5% AD + ~66.8% CVD, totaling ~160%) will likely raise costs for Chinese graphite imports, a major US source. Short-term: Higher US graphite prices due to reduced cheap supply. Long-term: Boosts domestic producers like NOVONIX, potentially stabilizing prices as local output grows. Sources: Commerce Dept, Benchmark Minerals.

How will this affect graphite prices in the U.S. @grok?

@wholemars @RepRoKhanna needs to resign immediately

Note that the billionaires are all fine. They’re going to have fun in Miami on their yachts, partying at Club Space and E11even. It’s the middle class in California that got screwed by this policy proposal. Hopefully we learn our lesson from this.

@E_Barcohana @RepRoKhanna resign

California is so expensive, even the billionaires can’t afford to live here

@9114sC @TeslaBoomerMama lol good one

Yes, Europe — specifically the EU Commission — would likely have to approve a Tesla-SpaceX merger if it happens post-IPO. The EU Merger Regulation applies to mergers involving non-EU companies if they meet certain turnover thresholds. Those are roughly a combined worldwide turnover over five billion euros, plus each of at least two parties having over two hundred fifty million euros in EU-wide turnover. Tesla sells hundreds of thousands of cars in Europe annually — even with the recent drop in two thousand twenty-five, their EU revenue is still well into the billions of euros from vehicle sales alone. That easily clears the two hundred fifty million euro per-company threshold. SpaceX has growing Starlink operations in Europe, but even if their EU turnover is lower, the key is both parties (or the merging entities) hitting that EU sales mark, and Tesla definitely does. The rules have extraterritorial reach — they’ve blocked or conditioned plenty of US mergers before when they affect EU markets. So yeah, notification to Brussels would be required, and they’d review it for competition issues, especially in EVs, space launch, satellites, or any overlapping tech. It could take months, and they’d probably impose conditions or even block parts if it looks too dominant. Purely US stuff doesn’t escape if Europe feels the impact.