Sarah D

2.7K posts

Sarah D

Sarah D

@SweetDugdale

Events Producer, Fundraiser, Operations Manager, lover of good food & drink

Entrou em Haziran 2011
553 Seguindo410 Seguidores
Sarah D retweetou
Richard
Richard@SurteesRichard·
@Anniepop2027 @ShelaghFogarty @LBC As a direct result of the Labour budget, my employer, a small national chain of clothes shops, has reduced shop opening hours. So as manager, I’ve lost 5 hours per week with a 12.5% salary reduction, paid holidays slashed from 25 to 20 days and stopped sick pay. Thanks Labour 😡
English
1
1
14
315
Sarah D
Sarah D@SweetDugdale·
@paul_hunt_68 @TomlinsonM @CF_Farrow Ah! Here you are again! arguing with others that the DofE is exempt for vat. Despite me sharing with you the guidance. Here’s a different gov link and screen shot (I’ll find the link). Note it doesn’t need to make a profit to have vat added. It’s just income to run the activity
Sarah D tweet media
English
0
0
0
43
Caroline Farrow
Caroline Farrow@CF_Farrow·
Parents of children at private schools have been informed that Duke of Edinburgh's Award Scheme fees are subject to VAT. If they pay for any additional SEN support teaching, that is also VAT-able. Spiteful discrimination that punishes children #findabetterway
English
47
151
694
21K
Sarah D retweetou
Heather🌸
Heather🌸@SusanStOswald·
@EducationNotTax @UKLabour Primary teaching was a great job when I qualified in 1978. Hard work, big classes, no teaching assistants or planning and prep time, but it was great fun, very rewarding. But by the time I retired in 2019, it had become really stressful and thankless. Such a shame!
English
0
1
6
99
Sarah D retweetou
Olly
Olly@oIIyjm·
🧵 Musings on @UKLabour's education tax from a teacher. Over the last few months I have often felt like a lone voice speaking out against private school-VAT amongst the education community. I have been shocked as many of the loudest and most influential... (1/10)
English
86
221
918
153.8K
Sarah D
Sarah D@SweetDugdale·
@RachelReevesMP Protecting jobs 😂!!! Only those gold plated civil servant jobs! Do you genuinely believe what you say?
English
0
0
0
15
Rachel Reeves
Rachel Reeves@RachelReevesMP·
Labour is protecting jobs, supporting industrial heartlands and boosting rail services. We made a promise to the workforce of the Newton Aycliffe factory and today we have delivered on that promise. chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-eas…
English
1.4K
136
607
206.9K
C
C@a_nother_person·
This guy bought a farm to avoid paying tax, just like his mates. He hates Labour because they cottoned on to this fact and decided to make them pay tax, like everyone else Pay your inheritance tax, farage, you're not exempt. #bbcqt
C tweet media
English
207
676
3.5K
64.5K
Sarah D
Sarah D@SweetDugdale·
@Hansford4Peter @jrkdenison Of course people need choice. What is right for one doesn’t work for every child. Location/wrap around care/SEN support/faith etc. many state schools are great and work for many people but not all schools work for every child.
English
0
0
5
20
cyril
cyril@Hansford4Peter·
@jrkdenison Therefore based on argument, why do parents need another choice for education when our state education is the envy of many nations. Your presumption that as parents we don’t realise how impressive state education is rather flawed. One daughter an architect state education is fine
English
2
0
0
169
James Denison
James Denison@jrkdenison·
The only people who think that private education is a privilege are those who take state education for granted. 14 years of British state education costs the taxpayer about £110k. The fact that it's available to all children in the UK, free at the point of delivery, is an enormous privilege and something for us to be immensely proud of. There are countless children in the world who couldn't even imagine such an opportunity, yet some of us evidently regard state education as the default setting, because it's only when you ignore your own privilege that you can attack private education on that basis. The hypocrisy is deep and obvious. #EducationNotTaxation
James Denison@jrkdenison

What an ill-conceived and contemptible comment. The fact that a choice may not be available to everyone doesn't mean that it's not a choice for those who can afford it. You can't deny the nature of a choice as such just because it's not universally available. The same fact also doesn't mean that whose who can afford that choice should be denied it. As I've told you before, how people choose to spend their taxed income is their business, not yours or the state's, and how dare you presume otherwise? Moreover, if someone spends their own money on something that saves the state money, then obviously that expenditure should not be taxed again. We should incentivise independence to limit the burden on the state, rather than encouraging state dependence by taxing merit goods. As for 'privilege', the privilege you have in mind comes from financial means. If you were to abolish private education, yes you'd deny families the choice whether to send their children to state or private school, but you'd also put a great deal of money back in the pockets of people who are, on the whole, relatively well-off by shifting the burden of educating their children to the state, funded by taxpayers who may be substantially less well-off. What a regressive outcome. Those families would then be able to afford to buy larger homes, save more effectively for retirement, buy other goods and services that they otherwise couldn't afford and so on. They'd still have all the advantages of their position in life and would still be just as 'privileged'. If you're really concerned about breaking privilege, you'd have achieved absolutely nothing. How pathetic. Meanwhile, as I have also previously explained on this platform, every child who receives an education is privileged, regardless of who pays. There was a time when education was only available to those who could afford private tuition. Now every child has the opportunity to learn at a level that would have astonished people living only a couple of hundred years ago. Access to the state education system is an enormous privilege for all those who use it. Your comments demonstrate that you take it entirely for granted. How utterly contemptible.

English
17
65
258
23.9K
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP·
🚨 NEW: Labour sets out plans for further SEND reform, including: £740m to create thousands of specialist places incl. in mainstream schools A Neurodiversity Group to drive work on inclusion No more Safety Valve agreements, pending whole-system reform gov.uk/government/new…
English
408
224
739
106.7K
Charlotte
Charlotte@Charlot66862571·
@simonhancock_uk @SweetDugdale @rachel__cruz @bphillipsonMP Around 40% of their expenditure Could be offset. Other than a few right wing papers there is very little indication that the state system is going to be flooded. I’d wager many parents have applied simply to prove a point. It’s also poor business to lose pupils on mass.
English
2
0
0
21
Sarah D
Sarah D@SweetDugdale·
@bphillipsonMP You done men’s EVERY child. You have said time & time again it’s not EVERY child. It’s only ‘93%’. You’ve reduced opportunities for children to bursaries and scholarships. You are categorically reducing opportunities. You should look to lift more up, than drag more down.
English
0
0
1
21
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP·
When we said we’d break down barriers to opportunity for every child, we meant every child. We’re driving reform to fix the foundations of the SEND system and deliver change for children and families.
Department for Education@educationgovuk

Last year only 20% of pupils with SEND met the expected standard in KS2 reading, writing and maths. Local authorities will soon benefit from a £740 million capital investment to make major reforms for pupils with SEND. Find out more ⬇️

English
319
65
362
63.6K