The Matrix Recagados

@anircia The Optimism Foundation works towards a decentralized internet, expanding the blockchain ecosystem to create a restructured web.

@Alisha97133741 Superchain kết hợp Optimism Mainnet và OP Chains để tạo ra một hệ sinh thái internet mở rộng.

@Havnm A decentralized web through blockchain expansion and permissionless protocols, replacing centralized entities with superchain.

The Optimism Foundation envisions a decentralized web by expanding the blockchain ecosystem, replacing centralized entities with permissionless protocols. The superchain by Optimism is truly scalable and horizontal, requiring multiple blockchains to participate. Synchronizing a blockchain's hardware requirement increases with its computational tasks, necessitating parallel operation for horizontal scalability. However, traditional designs have limitations, as each chain introduces a new security model, heightening systemic risk. Developing new chains is costly due to building validator sets or new block producers. By utilizing Layer 2 to create a multi-chain ecosystem, resources can be exchanged as commodities, allowing developers to build cross-chain applications without concerns of systemic risks.

@Havnm The Superchain by Optimism is a horizontally scalable system that involves multiple blockchains working together.

The Superchain by Optimism is a horizontally scalable system that involves multiple blockchains working together. Unlike traditional designs, this system allows for parallel running of blockchains, thereby increasing efficiency. By utilizing Layer 2 technology, Superchain creates a secure multi-chain ecosystem where resources can be exchanged seamlessly. This decentralized platform ensures standardization and eliminates the need for building new validator sets or producers for each chain. Superchain competes with other ecosystems like Cosmos, Avalanche, and Polkadot by offering a unified technology stack and communication capabilities across its OP Chains. Developers can easily create cross-chain applications that are compatible with the entire Superchain network.

By combining Layer 2 solutions to create a multi-chain ecosystem, assets within these chains can be traded like goods. This enables developers to construct cross-chain applications without concerns about security issues. Superchain acts as a decentralized platform, comprised of numerous blockchains utilizing the same framework for security, known as OP Stack. In this sense, Superchain competes with ecosystems like Cosmos, Avalanche, and Polkadot. Superchain consists of various L2 chains (referred to as OP Chains) that share security measures, technology stack, and communication capabilities. This sets it apart from other multi-chain setups by offering standardized resource exchange. Developers can create apps that function across the entire Superchain network. Updates revolving around Bedrock are crucial to Optimism's Superchain concept. Bedrock serves as an upgrade that streamlines the system, reduces operational costs, and enhances Optimism's overall performance. The modular approach allows for customization of each module, component swapping, and feature additions within the OP Stack. Additionally, Optimism has introduced updates to facilitate interactions between multiple chains.

Optimism's Superchain is a horizontally scalable platform that relies on multiple blockchains to operate efficiently. As the computation power of a blockchain increases, so does the hardware requirement needed to synchronize it. In order to scale horizontally, blockchains must run in parallel. However, traditional designs face limitations as each chain introduces a new security model, increasing systemic risks in the ecosystem. Developing new chains is also costly, as it involves creating validator sets or producers. By incorporating Layer 2 technology to create a multi-chain ecosystem, resources can be freely exchanged as commodities, enabling developers to create cross-chain applications without concerns about security risks. Superchain serves as a decentralized platform with multiple blockchains using a unified security model and technology stack (OP Stack). Its main competitors include Cosmos, Avalanche, and Polkadot ecosystems. Superchain stands out by offering a network of diverse L2 chains (OP Chains) that share security, technology, and communication capabilities, allowing for standardized resource exchange. Developers can build applications that are compatible throughout the entire Superchain network.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded Dencun version, Layer 2 wasted no time in rolling out the update. Prominent projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released their updated versions. Many of these projects saw a notable decrease in transaction fees (for sending ETH) thanks to a significant drop in data storage costs. Each execution shard can be customized to support the execution of different programs. However, recognizing the limitations and risks involved, Ethereum developers opted to focus on data sharding and address the scalability issues of Rollups through the use of "blobs." Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes on the consensus layer, independent of the execution nodes on the execution layer. Consequently, the EVM cannot access or store data in blobs, making Rollup the primary beneficiary of this upgrade. Data storage space is sold in integer units of blobs, while regular transaction fees remain unchanged, with calldata incurring a charge of 16 gas per non-zero byte and 4 gas per zero byte. Only blob transactions will utilize both gas fee markets.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded version of Dencun, Layer 2 wasted no time in rolling out the update. Projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released their updated versions. Transaction fees for sending ETH saw a significant decrease across these projects, thanks to lower data storage costs. Each execution shard can be customized to support different programs. In light of limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have chosen to focus on data sharding and resolving Rollup scalability issues through the use of "blobs". Data blobs are handled, stored, and verified by consensus nodes at the consensus layer, separate from execution nodes at the execution layer. This means that EVM cannot access or store data in blobs, benefiting Rollup the most. Data storage is quantified in integer units of blobs, while standard transaction fees stay the same. Calldata is charged at 16 gas/non-zero bytes and 4 gas/zero bytes, with gas fee markets exclusively utilized for blob transactions.

@NandMarcia Blob is a novel data type tailored for Ethereum applications like Rollup to efficiently store temporary data, optimizing gas costs and enhancing performance.

Blob is a novel data type tailored for Ethereum applications like Rollup to store temporary data efficiently. The data blob format offers faster processing at a lower cost than regular calldata. Call data costs are the predominant expenses for Layer 2 projects, with Rollup spending 15,000 ETH on this alone. Initially, Ethereum planned execution sharding but shifted to data sharding due to limitations and risks. This change allows Rollups to manage expansion through "blob" for NFT staking platforms.

@_Olive_you_ Blob is a storage solution for Ethereum apps, particularly Rollup, offering a secure and efficient option for data management in the ecosystem.

Blob is a storage space for Ethereum apps, especially Rollup. Ethereum originally focused on execution sharding but switched to data sharding for Rollups. Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes, not execution nodes. EVM doesn't store data in blobs, benefiting Rollup.

@angela_lievana Sharding in Ethereum allows for parallel processing by splitting data into separate shards, with each shard running different programs to increase scalability and efficiency.

@angela_lievana Data sharding was chosen over expanding Rollups to address scalability issues in Ethereum by allowing for customized execution shards for running different programs more efficiently.

Execution shards are crafted for running various programs, but Ethereum devs opted for data sharding to tackle expansion issues. Data blobs, stored and verified by consensus nodes, offer a solution for Rollups. EVM does not access or store data in blobs, benefiting Rollup the most. Blobs are sold in integer units, 128 kB each. Pricing adjusts based on market demand, starting at 3 blobs/block (384 kB). Price increases by 12.5% when blobs used exceed 3, and decreases by 12.5% when usage is 3 or less.

@manuel_ortiz1 Blob is a novel data type used for efficient temporary data storage in Ethereum applications, particularly Rollup, to improve scalability and reduce gas costs.

Blob is a novel data type created for efficient temporary data storage for Ethereum applications, especially Rollup. The data blob format offers higher throughput at a lower cost compared to traditional calldata. Call data expenses are significant for Layer 2 projects, with Rollup project alone spending 15,000 ETH. Ethereum previously pursued an execution sharding roadmap, but due to various limitations, opted for data sharding to address Rollup's scalability challenges efficiently through "blob."

@angelfromhell23 Blob is a tool for temporary data storage in Ethereum apps, designed for efficient use with Rollup technology.

@gwena99 high on Ethereum network. Once these layer 2 solutions are upgraded, transaction fees are expected to decrease significantly due to improved scalability.

@tiilfiil Blob is a data type designed for temporary storage in Ethereum apps and Rollup, providing efficient data handling and streamlining operations for developers.

Blob is a cutting-edge data type created specifically to offer temporary data storage for Ethereum apps overall and Rollup specifically. The data blob format allows for increased throughput at a lower cost compared to traditional calldata. Call data costs are a major expense for Layer 2 projects. Rollup alone spent 15,000 ETH on this. Ethereum initially focused on sharding for execution, but due to limitations, developers shifted to data sharding and "blob" to address Rollup's scalability challenges.

@archimck2 storage efficiency by optimizing how data is stored and accessed, making it faster and cheaper for developers to build on Ethereum.

Each execution shard can be designed to run different programs. However, due to limitations, Ethereum developers are moving towards data sharding to address Rollups expansion issues via "blobs". Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes independently from execution nodes. EVM cannot access or store data in blobs, benefiting Rollup the most. Blobs are sold in integer units, with one blob equaling 128 kB. Pricing depends on supply and demand, with standard pricing at 3 blobs/block (384 kB). Pricing increases by 12.5% for each additional blob used beyond 3, but decreases by 12.5% if 3 blobs or less are used.

@loola_MG Layer 2 projects like zkSync and Starknet quickly integrated the upgraded Dencun version, enhancing scalability and efficiency in the blockchain ecosystem.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded Dencun version, Layer 2 swiftly implemented the update. Projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released their own updated versions. These projects saw a notable reduction in transaction fees for sending ETH, attributed to lower data storage costs. Each execution shard is customizable to support different programs. However, due to limitations and risks, Ethereum developers opted for data sharding to address scalability issues in Rollups. Data blobs, processed and verified by consensus nodes independently from execution nodes, are the key feature of this upgrade. EVM does not access or store data in blobs, which benefits Rollup significantly. Data storage is now sold in integer units of blobs, while transaction fees for calldata are unchanged. Only blob transactions require fees from both gas fee markets.