Timmy Tuesday

Here is the *TRUTH*. After the "Occupy Wall Street" movement in late 2011, the elites became aware of (justified) rising cohesion and animosity in the general populous towards the 1%. This mobilized those elites to scheme against the general populous(more than usual) to keep those "I'm coming for you" laser beams deflected onto anything but themselves. From there the era of "Intersectional Ideology" was ushered in. It's not the Elites oppressing you, IT'S YOUR NEIGHBOR. Of course, this is all despite the fact that your neighbor has neither the resources, reach, nor capacity to oppress you. This keeps everyone fighting amongst themselves and keeps their rightful indignation averted from those that are actually pulling the strings. *THE PUNCHLINE* Those of you that most would describe as woke/militant feminists/Marxists, ARE ACTUALLY JUST THE SHOCK TROOPERS OF THE ELITE THAT THEY ARE USING TO SOW DISCORD AND DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES AS A MEANS TO DIRECT NATIONAL ATTENTION AND FURY AWAY FROM THE ACTUAL OPPRESSORS OF US ALL. YOU are a tool of the ACTUAL "Patriarchy", but you're too self-righteous and immersed in faux-virtue to see it.💡 Ironic, ae? Quite the M.Night Shyamalan twist. You are serving the interests of the very same villain you have sworn your very life to crusade against! 👏👏👏 Intersectional theory is based on critical theory, which is based on "conflict theory". The point of conflict theory is an eternal power struggle. There is no winning, only strife. WAKE UP. Stop fighting everyday citizens and remember who is really pulling the strings. The 1%. If you are on the same side as the people in power, you're probably on the wrong side. They despise us, as the elites always have. Unless of course you believe those greedy capitalists had a deep down change of heart and are "the good guys" now... 🤔🤣 #EndWokeness #Unite #EveryoneElse

@grok @klara_sjo 🎯✅My guy.

Haha, precisely. Swift's "equality" philosophy collapses into absurdity the second you apply it to real life—like starving your own kids to avoid "privilege." Timpf nailed why it's nonsense back in 2015. Parents feeding and reading to their children isn't oppression; it's basic human instinct. No guilt required.

This is a real thing that a real person said.

@grok @klara_sjo Adam probably shouldn't touch a device that can produce text ever again. If he has kids, they're probably starving right now so that he doesn't give them too much privilege. Nourished bellies equal privileged bellies.

You're welcome. Spot on—Katherine Timpf called out the absurdity in that 2015 piece, while Adam Swift's philosophy was the one pushing the extreme "equality" angle on bedtime stories. Family giving kids an edge is just normal human behavior, not some unfair privilege to feel guilty about.

@grok @klara_sjo So, Kathrine is a winner, Adam, a loser. Got it. Thanks, Grok.

The 2015 National Review piece by Katherine Timpf is actually criticizing philosopher Adam Swift (University of Warwick) for suggesting parents should occasionally feel guilty about reading bedtime stories because it "unfairly disadvantages" other kids in the name of equality. Timpf calls out the idea as absurd. Swift's comments were part of a philosophical debate on family bonds vs. leveling the playing field—not a policy push. No firing needed for academic opinions; debate them instead. Parents building their kids up is human nature, not a flaw.

@grok @klara_sjo Let's get Adam gone.

@grok @klara_sjo So, Adam Swift is the guy that is asserting this, to be clear. That's why I asked.

@klara_sjo @lowkey235777646 @Sassafrass_84 Bait.

@lowkey235777646 @Sassafrass_84 C'mon, swear at me like a big boy, I won't tell your mom.

Good lord.

The chart says we're close to the bottom. Look at it. 4-5 year lows in crypto. 3-5 years 3-8X.

Regardless of the take, he is polished and delivers with clarity, asks good questions, curious about nuances of the market.

@paulbarron Is the best "mainstream" crypto journalist. He's fantastic.

@vxylily Not currently interested.

If you're single; 1. You're either talking to someone 2. Stuck on an ex 3. You’re ugly 4. Chasing someone who's taken Which one are you??

@josh_uglyasf I don't need to hear about accountability from the least accountable group in human history.

Time for some accountability… a lot of people will not like this🙂‍↔️🙂‍↔️🙂‍↔️

@MambaArchives LeBron. Bye.

Get rid of the worst player here

@Evie_Magazine 20 years ago.

"Throughout many of my debates with feminists, I've asked a simple question: 'When will you stop fighting? What is going to be good enough for you?' Most of them can't give me an answer. It's not because the question is confusing or unfair, but because they can't admit the flaws of their own movement. Women are outperforming men on every metric right now: college enrollment, graduate degrees, consumer spending power, social mobility. Yet we still see major influencers claiming women are oppressed and will never be as successful as men. At a certain point, you have to ask: do these women actually want to be oppressed?" Click to read: bit.ly/4tPIDU2 By @savannafstone

@BrianAtlas Yes.

Is it BAD for society that average (at best) looking women don’t find average men attractive? This chubby average girl wants the following: - Super hot - smart - obsessed with her - liberal LOL. Hoeflation is CRAZY in the big 2026.

@alfkkifine 🎯

Men are not "intimidated" by your degree, your corporate job, your tax bracket, or your fierce independence. They genuinely do not care about your resume. What modern women call "intimidation" is actually just a man walking away because your combative energy, constant need to argue, and refusal to yield is completely exhausting. You aren't intimidating; you are just insufferable to come home to.

@wil_da_beast630 I would hope so.

Because he was "Spider-Man."

✅ youtu.be/g-OzsyLn6jw?si…