Toussovka

Trump entouré de sa secte évangélique se prend pour l’élu de Dieu

Mme Ducros, après avoir été là meilleure influenceuse de la politique "sanitaire" du gouvernement, à base de cafés assis, de pass charlatans et de plages dynamiques, s'en prend désormais aux agriculteurs, à qui elle apprend, du haut de son tabouret de plateau TV, ce qu'est l'agriculture ... Tout ça en les traitant de débiles. Cette petite caste de médiocres de plateaux continue de se rouler dans la fange, le culot et la bêtise.

In my post psychological autopsy of COVID we keep returning to the same question. Why did some people see it immediately, and why could others not see it at all, no matter how clear the evidence became? We have offered many answers. The neuroscience of prefrontal cortex degradation. The sociology of conformity under institutional pressure. The Milgram obedience data. The Asch conformity findings. The shadow psychology of people who needed their compliance to be universal. All of those answers are true. But there is a deeper layer. One that Jesus addressed directly in Matthew 13, and that Jung spent his entire career mapping from a different direction. When the disciples asked Jesus why he spoke in parables rather than plainly, his answer was one of the most psychologically honest statements in the entire New Testament. Because to you it has been given to know the mysteries of the kingdom, but to others it has not been given. To the one who has, more will be given. To the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. This passage has been weaponised for centuries as a justification for spiritual hierarchy, the elect, the saved, the chosen few set above the damned majority. That reading has always troubled people with a genuine conscience. It should. But read it as psychological diagnosis rather than theological verdict and something entirely different emerges. The symbol, the parable, the deeper meaning, the truth encoded in the story does not fail to land because some people are spiritually inferior. It fails to land because the symbol can only activate in a person who has the corresponding psychic reality to receive it. The unconscious content that the symbol is designed to reach must already exist within the person, must already be accessible, for the symbol to find purchase. If that content is buried too deep, if the defensive structures around it are too solid, if the person is too invested in the psychological architecture they have built around their current understanding of reality, the symbol bounces off. The parable about the sower becomes a nice story about a farmer. The warning encoded in it never arrives. To the one who has, meaning the person who has already begun to open. Who has already cracked. Who has already suffered enough, been disillusioned enough, been broken open enough by life, by loss, by the collision of their beliefs with an intractable reality, that person has already created the interior space into which the deeper meaning can enter. The symbol finds the wound and speaks directly to it. To the one who has not, meaning the person whose ego is still hermetically sealed. Whose defenses are fully intact. Who has not yet encountered the suffering or the disillusionment that would make them permeable. This is not condemnation. It is diagnosis. And it explains COVID with a precision that sociology alone cannot match. The people who saw it, who recognised immediately that something was profoundly wrong, who felt in their bodies the falseness of the narrative before they could articulate why, were not smarter. They were not spiritually superior. They were more broken open. They had already been through something that cracked the hermetic seal of the defended ego. A serious illness. A loss. A betrayal by an institution they had trusted completely. An encounter with suffering that the official story could not contain or explain. The crack let the light in. And the light let them see. The people who could not see, who not only complied but enforced, who not only accepted but attacked, were not stupider. They were more defended. Their psychological investment in the existing structure was too great. Their defenses too solid. The cost of seeing too high given everything that seeing would require them to dismantle. This is not condemnation. It is diagnosis. And it carries an implication that should inform everything about how we approach the people around us who still cannot see.

🇺🇸🌍 FLASH | Donald Trump affirme envisager de QUITTER l’OTAN, jugeant son soutien militaire insuffisant face à l’Iran. Il dénonce une alliance « tigre de papier » et assure que Vladimir Poutine « le sait aussi ». (Telegraph)

Il y a des victimes innocentes dans toutes les guerres, Une cent-cinquantaine de victimes, c'est certes très triste, mais ça n'est pas comparable aux centaines de milliers de victimes que font (ou ont fait) toutes les guerres, y-compris les guerres contemporaines (Iraq, Lybie, Syrie, Afghanistan, Yougoslavie, Afrique etc etc) menées sous des prétextes mensongers/fallacieux. Ici, le motif est réel et l'enjeu "vital pour le monde" puisqu'il s'agit de démanteler les bases arrières (dont l"Iran) de l'état profond = des mondialistes.

Grosse déception chez les juifs orthodoxes car en cette veille de Pessah, l'Iran n'a pas été vaincu et le Machiah n'est toujours pas apparu Le Rav Ron Chaya explique une fois de plus que ce n'est que partie remise.