Yuukimaru

The single most important mantra DR people need right now is: Stop hoping that by escaping to some place you will attain the kind of life boomers had. Was a historical anomaly. You will find it nowhere. Start hoping to become tough enough to prosper while living in the trenches.

It's not due to "male preference" at all. There are 0 cases that I am aware of, of a man rejecting a woman because she is earning too much money. It often happens that a man rejects a woman because she doesn't have much time to give him. But lacking time merely correlates to earning a high income. This is entirely women's preferences. Women are choosing to reject men who earn less but enough to raise a family. Women are choosing to give their most fertile years to colleges and corporations, over giving them to a man. Women are choosing to spend 10 hours with their spreadsheets for each 20 minutes they spend with their partner.

@YuukimaruRP @jakozloski It's not just male preference, either. Women are hardwired to seek out men who are higher status. High earning smart women have the narrowest of dating pools. Even the pretty, agreeable ones.

A man's income strongly predicts whether he marries. A woman's does not. And this effect has only gotten stronger over the last century. For men born around 1900, earnings explained about 2.5% of who ever married. For men born in the 1970s, over 20%. With the rise of gender equality, a man's ability to provide has paradoxically become more important, not less.

@DiodLeAnarchist Name just 3 dissident right individuals who used to be based on JQ, but later sided with the Jews. I'll wait, but won't hold my breath.

"If you can't beat 'em, join 'em" <--- The inevitable outcome of the so-called "dissident right" regarding jewishness

Actually, a woman's income DOES predict whether she marries. - Negatively, when you normalize by looks and IQ. If a woman is pretty, that makes her more likely to get married, and more likely to have a high income. If a woman is high IQ, that makes her more likely to get married, and more likely to have a high income. When you compare only women who are "pretty+high IQ+high income" to women who are "pretty+high IQ+low income", you will see very clearly that a low income woman is much more likely to get married. Proxy data: x.com/williameijer/s…

Gender equality is the most potent contraceptive (r ≈ 0.81)

Many people today understand that if a man is exceptionally good looking, women are willing to overlook his faults. A woman who rejected one man for having a salary not significantly higher than hers, and another man for not being "funny"; will be very happy to date an exceptionally good looking man who has all those faults. But understanding this, is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a much harsher fact that the beginner level red-pillers have yet to discover. It's this - When a man is exceptionally good looking, a woman is willing to overlook her own faults for him. This is similar, but much more important and has much darker implications. - A woman will often reject a man not because there is something wrong with him, but because there is something wrong with her. Maybe she still hasn't gotten over her ex. Maybe she is trying to careermaxx and sees dating as too much of a distraction. Maybe she has plans to migrate soon and is hence unwilling to get involved with someone who lives in her current country of residence. But a woman who has faults like these is willing to overlook them for an exceptionally good looking man. The reason this truth is so much darker, is - If an ordinary looking man gets rejected by a woman who will choose a better looking man with the same faults, the ordinary looking man can still work to fix his faults. He can still work to outshine the exceptionally good looking man in other areas. So that when he gets another date, a woman doesn't reject him for the faults she would have overlooked in a better looking man. But if an ordinary looking man gets rejected by a woman for her own faults, then there is nothing he can do about it. If he is not getting the 1st date, because the women he tries to flirt with are "not ready for a relationship", then him trying to improve anything is just pointless. P.S. I am not telling you this to demoralize you, but to make you realize that we do need a society-level fix. Many of you "internal locust of control" guys think you are doing young men a favor by telling what will motivate them to self-improve. But really you are causing all the men who will fail for systemic/statistical reasons to engage in self-blame and self-resentment instead of banding together to fix this wretched society.

The purpose of Hollywood movies is not to earn money. Both the directors of these movies and the shareholders of the corporations funding their production, are adherents of Antonio Gramsci. The motivation behind production of these movies is explained in Gramsci's theory of "cultural hegemony". The purpose they serve is: - To make people less likely to consume an earlier version of the story - To add an extra step for anyone trying to reference the older version, hence making references to older version less common (because having to use many words is tedious) - To desecrate the names of the characters (similar to how they corrupted words "freedom" and "marriage")

Europeans and American patriots! Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.” Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large. I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted. They cannot silence the truth! Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷

Notice how no one in his administration dares disagree with Donald Trump on anything. Then when Israel wants it, all of a sudden, half his team is in open rebellion. And it's totally kosher to say he's wrong and defy him. Interesting rules.

You are wrong. 70% of Zoomer men in the West will never in their entire life have any decent option whatsoever. We should still be warning them of what will happen when they marry a reformed whore. But just so that they would be better prepared, emotionally and legally. You can advise them all you want, they still won't end up with a functional marriage.

@uoislame If men were told this, most wouldn’t even come close to a whore. I’m convinced that men that marry whores are not doing it with informed consent. They think they’re consenting to a happy long marriage when really, they are consenting to cheating, sexlessness and lovelessness.

If you’re a young man waiting until marriage, don’t be stupid and marry a “reformed” whore. Have higher standards, don’t fall for a whore, and don’t let anyone manipulate you into thinking they become just like a virgin when they get dunked in water at some church.

The most promiscuous women in history are the same women that don't want to have sex with their husbands. They're also the women that will try to convince you that the past doesn't matter when it comes to marriage and that pair bonding is a choice they make with any man they want

And your solution is to go on an Ellulian rant about how "propaganda is not a neutral instrument but a technique whose internal logic and requirements for efficiency necessarily subordinate the user and escape human direction"; And how "a propagandist is never asked to be involved in what he is saying, for, if it becomes necessary, he may be asked to say the exact opposite with similar conviction." ?

@DiodLeAnarchist Among other things, come to a Juni's X space on some Saturday again. Last time we talked about the issues with having no well-defined rules; Next time lets talk about your ideas about how a sustainably tax-free zone would emerge, and how it would expand.

I have to go on a right-wing guy's podcast again. Any takers?

@YuukimaruRP @ChrisWillx True, very important. Even if you might have "dating" success at 40, the actual reproductive action happens at 20-40 for most men.

"Men’s desirability peaks at ages 40-50" is highly misleading. Men of all ages prefer a woman who is roughly around 20. Women who are around 20 are choosing mostly men who are in their 20s. The fact that 40 year old women are more likely to want a man who is 40-50 does not mean that men who are 40-50 are the most desirable, not in a way that men care about.

@muckledug @ChrisWillx I did not interview any men around 60. My opinion is based on evolutionary explanations, data from OKCupid, studies by Jan Antfolk, and the fact that I am currently 30 and my taste in women is not any different than when I was 20. I am open to new evidence.

@YuukimaruRP @ChrisWillx Hmm. I know plenty of men around my age (60ish) who are pretty open about their preferences - and none prefer women 'around 20'.

The dating market is brutal. Elizabeth Bruch, a professor of sociology at the University of Michigan analysed data from online dating. Here are some things she discovered… -Men’s desirability peaks at ages 40-50. But women’s desirability starts highest at age 18 and falls throughout their lifespan. -Both men and women pursue partners who are on average about 25% more desirable than themselves. -Women’s prospects dim as they achieve the highest level of education. -Almost no one messages users less desirable than they are. Everyone’s understanding of their place in the hierarchy is very accurate. -Men experience lower reply rates when they write more positively worded messages.

@YuukimaruRP Sensible enough: know Step 2 (if not also Steps 3,4,5) before initiating Step 1

Mid-looking Women on X (twitter) rarely engage with incels at all. When they do, the conversation usually goes like this: Women: Why are you incels allowing the so called "chads" to deceive and hurt women and get away with it? Why are you allowing "chads" to use us for sex and never commit? Incels: Oh, you dislike it now? Ok then, help us pass the laws to legally enforce monogamy. Then everyone will just be marrying their looksmatch and not sleep around. Women: Woah, cool it off with misogyny! This kind of fascist personality is exactly why you can't get laid!