آنديوفتش

Openai x The Grand Imam of Al-Azhar

انا كنت متخيل التويت ترووللينج/تهريج مثلا🤔 لكن ده طلع بجد والمطار واخد كود تشغيل دولي وكل حاجة بس مافيش رحلات منه او له

become ungovernable

رغم أن المقطع قديم، إلا أنه يظل درساً خالداً… حين توقّف رئيس مجلس الوزراء عند رجل كبير بالسن كان يتشمس بعد هطول الأمطار، وجلس بجواره بتواضع، وحين علم أن منزله يحتاج لصيانة، أمر له بمنزل جديد، مواقف كهذه لا تُنسى، لأنها تختصر معنى العظمة والتواضع في وطن اسمه الإمارات.

@vtchakarova Any*

@vtchakarova Amy reason other than it behind right before a weekend for it to be a threshold?

May 1 threshhold..

@WatchChad How come Vance was evacuated before Trump?

THIS IS THE MOMENT SECRET SERVICE AGENTS ESCORTED JD VANCE OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS' DINNER.

Araghchi’s tweet reflected an understanding in Tehran, likely based on what they heard from Pakistan, that if they took a positive step by opening Strait of Hormuz, US would reciprocate by lifting the blockade. But Trump kept the blockade in place, and through his many tweets, suggested that Iran was surrendering on the nuclear issue. This has only fed Iran’s suspicions about Trump and that Islamabad like Geneva is a diplomatic ruse before another military attack. The door to diplomacy is not closed, but it has now become considerably more difficult. Deliberately or not, Trump has undermined diplomacy and raised likelihood of more war.

Pay attention to the sequence, not the noise. FM Munir flew to Tehran, put new proposals on the table. Iran says they are under review. The strait was declared open, stocks surged, then Trump said the blockade stays, Iran reimposed restrictions. Now Trump says Iran cannot squeeze the US again by closing the strait and that talks are still ongoing, he would know by end of the day. Meanwhile Iran is reviewing Munir's proposals. It looks chaotic. It is not. The mediation through Pakistan is seamless. Washington cannot look soft on Iran. Tehran cannot look like it is bending. But behind the posturing, proposals are moving and Pakistan is the relay holding it together.

“Hunger and even famine are foreseeable consequences of the war in the Middle East.”

Mind blowing. Two years and the crisis hasnt even been solved yet.

عقد غاز ضخم مع مصر في حقل قبرصي بمشاركة شركة " نيو ميد " الإسرائيلية صفقة غاز إقليمية جديدة بين قبرص ومصر تقضي بتوريد كامل إنتاج حقل أفروديت من الغاز الطبيعي إلى مصر ضمن اتفاق طويل الأمد. تقوم الصفقة على بيع نحو 100 مليار متر مكعب من الغاز الطبيعي لمدة 15 عاماً، مع إمكانية التمديد، عبر تطوير بنية تحتية تشمل منصة عائمة وخط أنابيب بحري لنقل الغاز إلى مصر. تسلط هذه الصفقة الضوء على تعاظم الدور الإسرائيلي في سوق الطاقة الإقليمي، حيث تشارك شركة نيوميد إنرجي الإسرائيلية، إلى جانب شركات طاقة دولية كبرى، في تطوير الحقل وتنفيذ المشروع. ويعكس ذلك دور إسرائيل ليس فقط كمصدر للغاز، بل كشريك أساسي في مشاريع الطاقة والبنية التحتية الإقليمية، في وقت تتزايد فيه أهمية التعاون الاقتصادي لمواجهة التحديات الجيوسياسية @IsraelinEgypt

عقد غاز ضخم مع مصر في حقل قبرصي بمشاركة شركة " نيو ميد " الإسرائيلية صفقة غاز إقليمية جديدة بين قبرص ومصر تقضي بتوريد كامل إنتاج حقل أفروديت من الغاز الطبيعي إلى مصر ضمن اتفاق طويل الأمد. تقوم الصفقة على بيع نحو 100 مليار متر مكعب من الغاز الطبيعي لمدة 15 عاماً، مع إمكانية التمديد، عبر تطوير بنية تحتية تشمل منصة عائمة وخط أنابيب بحري لنقل الغاز إلى مصر. تسلط هذه الصفقة الضوء على تعاظم الدور الإسرائيلي في سوق الطاقة الإقليمي، حيث تشارك شركة نيوميد إنرجي الإسرائيلية، إلى جانب شركات طاقة دولية كبرى، في تطوير الحقل وتنفيذ المشروع. ويعكس ذلك دور إسرائيل ليس فقط كمصدر للغاز، بل كشريك أساسي في مشاريع الطاقة والبنية التحتية الإقليمية، في وقت تتزايد فيه أهمية التعاون الاقتصادي لمواجهة التحديات الجيوسياسية.

@citrinowicz How much say does israel have in deciding the next US step?

The U.S. Faces a Strategic Deadlock with Iran The failure of the recent talks in #Islamabadtalks drives from the fact that Iran did not arrive at the negotiating table weakened or desperate. On the contrary, Tehran came with a sense of resilience, and even advantage and behaved accordingly. For weeks, the U.S. policy appears to have been guided by the assumption that sustained kinetic pressure had eroded Iran’s position enough to force meaningful concessions, particularly on uranium enrichment and freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. But negotiations are not shaped by objective reality alone, they are driven by perception. And Iran’s perception is fundamentally different. From Tehran’s perspective, it has withstood pressure, absorbed blows, and demonstrated its capacity to retaliate across multiple arenas. That is not the mindset of a regime preparing to compromise. This gap between American expectations and Iranian self-perception now lies at the heart of a growing strategic deadlock. The options facing Washington are all "problematic": A. Renewed negotiations may simply reproduce the same dynamics, with Iran unwilling to concede and the U.S. unwilling to settle for less. B. Ending the confrontation without an agreement risks signaling weakness and undermining deterrence. Escalation, meanwhile, carries the most significant risks of all. C. A return to high-intensity conflict is unlikely to produce decisive results. While strikes on Iranian infrastructure, or even more ambitious military moves, could impose real costs on the regime, they would almost certainly trigger a broader response. Iran has both the capability and the willingness to expand the conflict horizontally, targeting U.S. interests, Israel, and regional partners. The result would not be a quick resolution, but a wider war with direct implications for global energy markets and economic stability. In other words, military escalation may satisfy the desire to reassert leverage, but it is unlikely to deliver a strategic breakthrough. This leaves Washington with a difficult but unavoidable conclusion: the burden of recalibrating strategy rests primarily on the United States. That does not mean conceding to Iranian demands. But it does require a more sober assessment of what pressure alone can achieve, and a clearer understanding of the risks embedded in escalation. The alternative is to continue operating under an illusion of leverage, one that recent events have already begun to expose. Complicating matters further are the mounting political and strategic constraints facing Washington. With a high-stakes meeting between President Trump and China’s Xi Jinping on the horizon, a global spotlight event like the Soccer World Cup approaching, and midterm elections looming, the U.S. has limited appetite, and even less time, for a prolonged military campaign. Large-scale options such as a ground invasion would require months to execute and sustain, with no guarantee of decisive results. Even extensive strikes on Iranian infrastructure, while painful, are unlikely to deliver a knockout blow. Instead, they risk entrenching the conflict and inviting retaliation across multiple fronts. Taken together, these constraints underscore a deeper reality: the United States is not just facing a tactical dilemma, but a strategic entanglement, one in which its military options are costly, its diplomatic leverage is limited, and time is increasingly working against it. Meanwhile, Iran remains defiant. The regime shows no indication that it is prepared to yield, certainly not under pressure, and not at this stage. Strategy deadlock. #IranWar‌

ما يجري في مفاوضات إسلام آباد ليس خلافاً على ممر بحري، بل صراع على من يكتب قواعد الأمن والاقتصاد في الخليج. وإصرار إيران على السيطرة على مضيق هرمز أو فرض رسوم مرور يعني أنها لا تفاوض لإنهاء الأزمة، بل لترسيخ نموذج نفوذ طويل الأمد يقوم على "تسييس الجغرافيا" وتحويلها إلى أداة ابتزاز استراتيجي.

@YngviCom “The Iranian 10-point plan”, which Im sure Trump has read

"the terms and conditions, which im sure most customers have read"

دور مصر فالوساطة الي محدش شافوا 😂🤣

Now imagine if Putin had said about Ukraine what Trump is saying about Iran.

Kaja Kallas

How is Kash Patel the FBI director? I never understood that.