RN MickelsonG

@Karasha68 @RadioFreeTom Wrong they took down one. Ina. Mont. meanwhile they lost their entire Air Force Navy nuke program annd lost most leadership and 15,000 IRGC dead. Meanwhile they managed to kill a grand total of ten Americans and ZERO IDF. What a joke

@bubbagp4 @RadioFreeTom They seem to be doing just fine. They have taken out at least 3 of our Warcraft in the past couple days and probably have an American soldier as a hostage. So much winning.

Reports now that Hegseth oversold the war to Trump and underestimated Iran's willingness to fight back. It's almost as if he's unqualified for his job. Too bad the Senate didn't have confirmation hearings; those would have proven his manifest unsuitability to lead the Pentagon.

@AyshaSusmaz They shit one plane down in a month 😂

“Take Iran back to the Stone Age,” you said. Then Iran proves your air supremacy is a myth. Then you begged Iran for a 48‑hour ceasefire just to rescue ONE pilot. Which Iran rejected. Tell us who’s winning?

@joekent16jan19 No you really aren’t you pray for the death of our troops you fucking traitor

Praying for the rescue of our downed pilot & the safe return of our Special Operators going in to get him back. USAF PJs & CSAR Air crews are top notch🇺🇸🦅

@alabayemmanuel9 @Osint613 Don’t care about civilians Ina. Rescue it’s literally irrelevant

@Osint613 Conflicting reports like this underline how volatile the situation is. Independent verification is key, and the human impact of strikes in civilian areas should never be overlooked.

Lebanon report: Early Saturday, an Israeli drone strike hit a vessel at Tyre’s fishermen port, killing Hezbollah operative Mustafa Fakih. Reports say he was on the boat after being near the port with others.

@MaMoMVPY After Iran Denmark should be next

So maybe try to stop fucking whining all the time and get the lunatic in the White House out asap.

@AnaKasparian @awokemillennial @Ostrov_A Unfortunately not true. Very very unfortunately

@awokemillennial @Ostrov_A Yeah the U.S. will do it instead.

🚨 As you’re going about your day, hundreds of thousand of Israelis are racing to bomb shelter, after Iran just fired another barrage of missiles, including in Tel Aviv.

@AnaKasparian @abierkhatib @Ostrov_A Ana Katarina saying it’s ok to kill Jewish civilians. Pig

@Ostrov_A The IDF is using civilians as human shields. Iran has the right to defend themselves. This is a clash between barbarism and civilization. Victim card expired a long long time ago.

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 Censorship 😂 you are a literal embarrassment. Israel is destroying both Iran and Lebanon with almost no damage to Israel. They have lost literally ZERO troops to Iran and under the total to hezbollah while killing 15,000 IRGC and 1,200 hezbollah

@bubbagp4 @EthanLevins2 You don't even know there's censorship in Israel and that nothing is being leaked. We don't know exactly how many people died. And residents are forbidden from filming under penalty of imprisonment. So there were far more than five deaths on the Israeli side, don't be naive.

The Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon has significantly slowed down due to Hezbollah’s use of FPV drones. The IDF hasn’t made any ground in over a week. When will israel learn not to invade the south of Lebanon??

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 Not only that but Israel has killed 1,200 hezbollah piglets vs losing 5 IDF. It’s pathetic

@bubbagp4 @EthanLevins2 L'Orient-Le Jour is a Lebanese Zionist media outlet, so it's not very reliable when it comes to Hezbollah. Haaretz is more objective; go read that one instead, plus it's Israeli. Anyway, keep acting all high and mighty.

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 You have to stop you are embarrassing yourself hezbollah itself admits it.

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 🤡

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 In April 2026, the Lebanese newspaper L'Orient-Le Jour (and its English site L'Orient Today) has reported on Israeli military advances reaching the Litani River and the official Israeli policy to maintain a long-term "security zone" up to that waterway. In April 2026, the Lebanes

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 From chat gbt … Yes, as of late March 2026, Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz has officially announced that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will maintain security control over southern Lebanon up to the Litani River.

@bubbagp4 @EthanLevins2 You're just a troll trying to sound important online. The IDF has been confined to the border area for a month. They haven't managed to invade southern Lebanon. And Lugano is a city in Switzerland, you ignorant fool. The Lebanese river is called the Litani.

@SDebora48015 @EthanLevins2 Israel controls all the way to the Lugano almost without a fight. FACT you retad

@bubbagp4 @EthanLevins2 Who? When? You're dreaming! You need to get informed, stop this nonsense…😏

@ryangrim Holy shit Ryan grim is literally calling for our troops to be murdered. Traitor deal with him like one

Yes the rural Iranians shooting at our helicopters do indeed deserve better arms, good thought Mark

@ImBreckWorsham What’s verifies is you are retarded

@rushicrypto Or we can just destroy the remaining Iranian armed forces

Here is my proposal. Iran opens the Strait of Hormuz to all shipping. President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Secretary Hegseth resign. All US bases in the Middle East close forever. Iran agrees to abandon regional proxies. The US stops arms shipments to Israel. Iran agrees to not pursue nuclear weapons and allow verification. What do you say?

@BillAckman @BartemyS @X You could have said all this in three sentences

@BartemyS @X That’s where I came out. I am less seeking advice then getting this off my chest, but is reassuring that there appears to be a consensus that I am approaching this correctly.

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@MarioNawfal 😂

🇮🇷 Iran's military says it's closer to full control of its airspace, thanks to new systems built by what they call "the knowledgeable youth of Iran."