Daniel Barkeley

484 posts

Daniel Barkeley

Daniel Barkeley

@danielbarkeley

Détroit Entrou em Haziran 2025
126 Seguindo12 Seguidores
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
This is why progress on climate won't be linear and net zero is still achievable. So many economic tipping points yet to be unlocked in the coming decades.
Nicolas Fulghum@nicolasfulghum

The next tipping point in the energy transition is approaching. Overall, solar has already been cheaper than fossil power for a while, but upfront costs used to be higher. That's no longer the case. Solar is now competitive upfront AND has vastly lower operating costs (no fuel)

English
0
0
0
61
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
@WatsonNeil3 @afneil No...are you that sort that wants to return to the 19th century when coal mining was the only job outside farming a man could find?
English
3
0
0
75
anonymouse77
anonymouse77@WatsonNeil3·
@danielbarkeley @afneil Are you are the type of heartless ghoul that laughs at miners, shipyard workers, steelmen, etc etc losing their homes when they cant pay their mortage?
English
1
0
2
82
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
@DagenhamMKIII @afneil Wow....that's a bold statement that contradicts all available evidence. Recent trends show renewables making massive progress in penetrating the energy mix. What's the evidence for your claim that progress will halt and go into reverse?
English
1
0
1
62
JonjoBamjo
JonjoBamjo@JonjoBamjo·
@danielbarkeley @afneil Won't even be 50%. We're at peak renewables now and the rest of the economy won't cope with anything less
English
1
0
0
14
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
You are aware that oil and gas together still account for 73–75% of the UK's total primary energy consumption (which covers all energy needs across electricity, heating, transport, industry and other sectors, measured in primary energy terms)? So explain to me exactly how ‘you will make it happen’ that we don’t use fossil fuels.
Tris Osborne MP@TrisOsborneMP

Let’s make it happen…

English
79
258
1.1K
46.8K
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
@LaindonAndy @afneil That's already not true. Spain has small amounts of gas on the grid - which is nessecary to support wind and solar. But the amount of gas is so small it doesn't set the retail price; they have the cheapest electricity in Europe. The UK needs to move to that model.
English
1
0
0
14
andy
andy@LaindonAndy·
@danielbarkeley @afneil Gas will always be on the grid and, as such, will always define the price paid of all energy generation due to the suicidal way we pay for energy.
English
1
0
1
16
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
All that’s impressive is that your energy policies — supported by all major parties — have decimated our energy-intensive industries, thanks to giving us the most expensive industrial energy costs in the world. Well done. Quite an achievement.
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley

@afneil Maybe the timescale of the previous chart is confusing you. 10% in ten years is impressive. And the tech is getting better. It'll be 20% next decade, and 40% the decade after. And don't blame Green Energy for Brexit and the Conservatives shit industrial policy.

English
16
64
256
20K
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
@bondysimon @afneil It's a good question. Much of Europe's aluminum industry has been exported to Iceland - which is powered by geothermal and hydro. You're probably talking about China though. It's rapidly greening and closing in on the UK's percentage of fossil energy.
Daniel Barkeley tweet media
English
2
0
1
88
Simon Bond
Simon Bond@bondysimon·
@danielbarkeley @afneil Daniel do you think any of our industrial capabilities have been ‘exported’ to somewhere else? If so what is the power mix of that ‘somewhere else’? Please make reference to both coal and oil & gas in your answer. Now ask adjusted for that what your chart looks like.
English
1
0
1
126
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
@echintune @afneil No fossil fuels still have plenty of non-energy uses. There might be some residual gas usage in winter. Maybe jet fuel, if we can't synthesize a replacement. But it'll be at least a 90% reduction by 2050 ,and the rest will be mopped up shortly thereafter.
English
0
0
0
22
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
@MarkFaulknerUK Sure, but it doesn't really siphon capital away from renewables to a meaningful extent. So a useful moonshot prospect. I don't think anyone would oppose it's deployment if we built a working reactor.
English
0
0
0
4
Mark Faulkner
Mark Faulkner@MarkFaulknerUK·
@danielbarkeley Fusion seems like a silly lower probability waste of money when we could focus on a higher probability solution of solar in space. But fusion is a sexier solution, I suppose.
English
1
0
0
6
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
I have yet to meet anyone who opposes fusion, lol.
Niels Harksen@HarksenNiels

Das Problem ist aus meiner Sicht nicht die Befürwortung von EE (in der Praxis vor allem Windkraft und Solarenergie). In dem Bereich steckt ja durchaus viel Potenzial (bin weltweit gesehen sehr bullish bei PV, etwas skeptisch bei Windkraft). Das Problem ist vielmehr die Befürwortung von EE bei gleichzeitiger Bekämpfung von Kernspaltung, Kernfusion und CCS. Und die notwendigen Verrenkungen zur Rechtfertigung und politischen Absicherung dieses Ausschlusses gingen für die Anhänger der reinen EE-Lehre mit großen epistemischen Kosten einher.

English
2
0
0
50
JonjoBamjo
JonjoBamjo@JonjoBamjo·
@danielbarkeley @afneil It's taken 15 years and the strangulation of the electricity market to get the figure down to 85%! Jesus.
English
1
0
0
22
Daniel Barkeley
Daniel Barkeley@danielbarkeley·
The UK has expensive electricity because - unlike Spain and Portugal - you haven't finished the job and gotten expensive gas off the grid. If you think the Iran War is an argument in favor of fossil dependency - you're delusional.
Andrew Neil@afneil

All that’s impressive is that your energy policies — supported by all major parties — have decimated our energy-intensive industries, thanks to giving us the most expensive industrial energy costs in the world. Well done. Quite an achievement.

English
0
0
1
127
Calum Stevens
Calum Stevens@Calum92Stevens·
@danielbarkeley @afneil 25bn per year for roughly 20 years. Like it or not and argue over it if you wish, but it's cost a dam fortune. And we've nothing left. Can't make fertilizer, steel, plastics, own fuel... It's mental.
English
1
0
7
90
Calum Stevens
Calum Stevens@Calum92Stevens·
@danielbarkeley @afneil It's only cost us about 600bn so far for a 10 percent reduction and no jobs and a shattered economy. How much further do you suggest we go?
English
1
0
13
259

Descobrir

@WatsonNeil3 @afneil @DagenhamMKIII @JonjoBamjo @LaindonAndy @bondysimon @echintune @MarkFaulknerUK