Lt. J.T. Marsh

1.6K posts

Lt. J.T. Marsh banner
Lt. J.T. Marsh

Lt. J.T. Marsh

@marsh_lt

A rough and tough sqaud leader with natural instincts. Brilliant combat strategist who never met a rule he didn't break. No leader ever cared more about his men

Entrou em Ocak 2020
289 Seguindo34 Seguidores
Tweet fixado
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
Do it for her
Lt. J.T. Marsh tweet media
English
1
0
4
0
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@justalexoki After a certain point it’s not the man’s job especially if she doesn’t communicate or put in effort.
English
0
0
5
1.7K
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@karpathy It’s a three legged stool : models, integration , and iteration. Chain of thought reasoning was the breakthrough. Combine these four things it’s a new plateau
English
0
0
0
17
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along. So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions. TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.
staysaasy@staysaasy

The degree to which you are awed by AI is perfectly correlated with how much you use AI to code.

English
936
2.3K
19.3K
3.8M
Brandon Straka #WalkAway
Brandon Straka #WalkAway@BrandonStraka·
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani unveils a “racial equity plan” directing resources toward “black and brown New Yorkers” across city agencies. Critics argue the policy raises concerns over race-based treatment.
English
748
428
1.9K
2.1M
Elvis
Elvis@elvissun·
this thread is what mass cope from legacy devs looks like. i talked to @FastCompany about why @garrytan's "AI slop" is actually the future of software engineering. the mass code review. the line-by-line gatekeeping. the "craftsmanship" that was really just slow iteration disguised as rigor - that era is over. and the engineers who built their entire identity around it are panicking. @gregorein brags about burning 3 billion tokens last year while dunking on garry for flexing lines of code. i've burned 6.6 billion in the past three months on codex alone. by his own logic, i'm 8x as credible. see how silly that sounds? yes, he found real issues. yes, they got fixed. that's exactly the point. karpathy's autoresearch proved this already - AI agents can solve very complex problems just by operating inside feedback loops, iterating to optimize a loss function. this is what software engineering is now - gradient descent. ship, measure, self-correct, repeat. all by the agent itself. this is the new startup playbook. your job isn't to review every line before deploy. your job is to build systems where agents observe outcomes - mrr, analytics, error rates, user behavior - and self-improve. the engineer's role shifts from gatekeeper to building the machine that builds the machine. you could run this level of audit (using AI) on any production site and find the same issues - most just don't have a billionaire CEO attached for virality. mocking the people who adapted is easier than adapting. but the craft is evolving whether you like it or not.
gregorein@Gregorein

so... I audited Garry's website after he bragged about 37K LOC/day and a 72-day shipping streak. here's what 78,400 lines of AI slop code actually looks like in production. a single homepage load of garryslist.org downloads 6.42 MB across 169 requests. for a newsletter-blog-thingy. 1/9🧵

English
192
18
220
251.1K
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@chirno_helmet The real joy is it’s less a matter of what and more a matter of consistent application
English
0
0
0
10
ちるへる
ちるへる@chirno_helmet·
アメリカ人達から真面目な答えもアメリカンジョークも来て面白い ・40年前にメートル法を導入しようとしたけど広まらなかった ・日常が全てヤードポンド法だから特に困らない ・ヨーロッパの言うことに従うのは癪だから導入しない ・ヤードポンド法がアメリカ人としての意地と誇りになっている ・アメリカ独立時にフランス王室からメートル原器が寄贈されたけど、積んだ船がイギリスの海賊船に沈められた ・メートル法はゲイ
ちるへる@chirno_helmet

アメリカ人へ Xにいる日本人の多くがアメリカに好意的なのはわかってもらえたと思う。 ただ、俺を含めたそういった日本人全員がアメリカに対してどうしても許せないことがある。 ヤードポンド法という悪しき単位だ。なぜ世界標準であるメートル法を頑なに拒み続けるんだ。

日本語
354
1.3K
9.6K
898.2K
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@fromdusktildawn We don’t incarcerate addicts and neither audit or set stringent standards so any welfare succumbs to abuse fraud and exploitation
English
0
0
0
4
ふろむだ
ふろむだ@fromdusktildawn·
アメリカ人に聞きたいんだけど、 アメリカの一人当たりGDPは日本の2.6倍もあるのに、 なんでそんなに生活が苦しい人が多いの? 高所得の人がたくさんいるんだから、再分配を少し強化するだけで、貧しい人たちの生活はぐっと楽になると思うけど、なんで再分配を強化しないの? ちなみに、再分配を強化するのは社会主義でも共産主義でもないよ。 それは修正資本主義。君たちの大好きな資本主義を、ほんのちょっと修正しただけのものだよ。
日本語
2.3K
220
2.5K
874.3K
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@TheVallyD >super girl movie >too adult for girls Let’s see how this goes at the box office
English
0
0
0
19
Valerie D'Orazio
Valerie D'Orazio@TheVallyD·
You know, there's this *whole other way* of promoting a movie/project like this where you're the actor/actress or the director/showrunner and you go: "Hey, I just want to reach out to the fans & tell them how excited we are to be working on this beloved property."
Variety@Variety

#Supergirl star Milly Alcock knows she'll face backlash by "simply existing as a woman in [franchise IP]." "We have become very comfortable having this weird ownership of women’s bodies. I can’t really stop them. I can only be myself." variety.com/2026/film/news…

English
102
96
1.2K
37.3K
sebastian castillo
sebastian castillo@bartlebytaco·
as a firmly middle millennial i wonder sometimes if there’s a single cultural trope or inheritance my age group produced that has aged well. our mount rushmore is like, jim from the office, heckin doggo parlance, buzzfeed, reaction gifs. sad stuff
English
201
35
2K
1.6M
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@j3lqingt0n Long hair big boobs and a big butt, robust, not fat like those are the essential ingredients after that doesn’t really matter
English
0
0
0
412
Johan Jelqington
Johan Jelqington@j3lqingt0n·
This just proves the point that if you're significantly manly there's nothing hotter than going all out on a slightly ugly shy girl who looks decent naked and teaching her what sorts of sounds she can make. It's the sexual equivalent of burning anthills with a magnifying glass.
Ambar@Ambar_SIFF_MRA

Henry Cavill and his longtime partner, Natalie Viscuso. They aren't particularly looks-matched. Most would agree he is noticeably better looking than her. Yet examples like this are quite common. It highlights how men frequently prioritize loyalty, honesty, and compatibility over purely superficial looks.

English
53
44
1.5K
296.9K
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@EricRWeinstein I would opine the correct formulation of ai will evolve to "inferencing as a computing substrate" i.e. a way to compute data -- will be more comprehensible to applications.
English
0
0
0
67
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
Peter: they are not PhD level in physics. You trail behind a model picking up all it breaks. This is a bleeding edge malfunctioning military grade research project weirdly marketed direct to consumer to fund R&D at the top of mad hype cycle that’s likely *directionally* correct.
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis

If AI can now solve math, discover physics and chemistry breakthroughs faster than human PhDs, why are we still training humans to be physicists? Serious question. Should education shift from 'learn to do X' to 'learn to direct AI doing X'? The wrong direction costs a generation their careers.

English
112
54
829
181.9K
jake rhodes
jake rhodes@jakebrodes·
I love seeing these sculptures and imagining there’s one guy in the tribe who’s just beast as fuck at making these things. Maybe he can’t hunt or fight worth a fuck hit god damn can he make a Tree PAWG. Probably the coolest fucking guy in the tribe.
Trey the Explainer 🔜 FWA@Trey_Explainer

Imagine living in an isolated Neolithic farming village and one day your homie just shows you this and changes your brain chemistry forever

English
83
2K
36.9K
921.6K
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
@KenWattana yes exactly! a bit like i'm being manipulated in some creepy way. "please like me, look how much i know about you, we are good friends".
English
11
4
520
36.6K
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
One common issue with personalization in all LLMs is how distracting memory seems to be for the models. A single question from 2 months ago about some topic can keep coming up as some kind of a deep interest of mine with undue mentions in perpetuity. Some kind of trying too hard.
English
1.8K
1.1K
21.2K
2.7M
Lt. J.T. Marsh
Lt. J.T. Marsh@marsh_lt·
@DouthatNYT The more interesting point here is maybe there is a terminal decline of culture when the majority cohort realigns around their values. We currently entitle the elder boomer but if millennials just move into those privileges by merit of age will we ever see a youth moment again
English
0
0
0
550
Ross Douthat
Ross Douthat@DouthatNYT·
This is a correct take, and per the BAPist theory I assume that all this powerful Dionysian energy produced a major fertility spike in the '60s and '70s relative to the more bourgeois-Christian 1950s? A veritable baby boom, even? x.com/RogueScholarPr…
Rogue Scholar Press@RogueScholarPr

The intensification of sexuality & glorification of the male sexual impulse which BAP calls for is exactly what the cult of rock n roll was from its inception with Elvis all the way through to the 80s, which is why Paglia called rock n roll the fullest expression of the Dionysian

English
42
32
474
80K
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Why have testosterone levels been rising over time? The testosterone levels of American men are up compared to what they used to be, but no one has a good explanation. Let's look through some possibilities🧵
Crémieux tweet media
English
324
127
2.2K
591K