RedMech

@Reecebrah then Indians are the gods among men

Real bravery is where ur willing to take a sh*t The lowest T men can only poop at home Autists and social anxiety types Average mfs may be willing to drop one in a nice hotel lobby or upscale grocery store But the bravest of men The conquerors Will sh*t at the gas station

@DonAlt chat is still retarded. we may have to go lower

Starting to like crypto a little again Shit was vile for the last year or so Bear markets are the best thing that happen to this asset class, gives at least a couple quarters where discourse isn't retarded, grifty and disgusting

@Earth2Plato @rainbowdotme 1000 points 1 token

@rainbowdotme What’s the points to tokens conversion rate? @rainbowdotme

that feeling when we finally get the $RNBW airdrop tomorrow.

@A_Leutenegger @evabeylin @VitalikButerin bad

@evabeylin @VitalikButerin Good or bad WTF?

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

@eissakilo @mikedemarais 10000 points to 1 coin

@mikedemarais In your opinion, how many tons of points are there so we know how much a point is worth compared to a $rnbw?

if you tried to participate in the $RNBW coinlist sale but got stuck on KYC bullshit, you can permissionlessly participate in the $RNBW CCA no kyc needed. just connect ur eterueium wallet

@HIBINANCE @rainbowdotme 1000 points to 1 coin u hear it here first

@rainbowdotme Points Ratio?

Bids are now being filled. The $RNBW CCA Auction is officially live for the next 2 days — connect your wallet and participate! app.uniswap.org/explore/auctio… Buckle up, we're going full speed toward $RNBW Road 🌈✨

@Shagor580 @rainbowdotme @ArrakisFinance 10000 points to 1 coin

@rainbowdotme @ArrakisFinance Point ratio?

Full details and timing of the $RNBW @Uniswap CCA 🗓 Mon Feb 2: Pre-bids open at 10am EST ⏳ Tue Feb 3: Pre-bids close at 10am EST. CCA starts 10am EST. 🏁 Thu Feb 5: CCA ends 10am EST continued below…

@feji_boy @EjaakSujuran @_isha_here he does

@EjaakSujuran @_isha_here I’m not sure you understand the game

Name him whatever you last ate 😭

@perpltrade wassup

last day to be early for Perpl drop a reply so we can document everyone who was here before testnet

@AiShiba_Arb sweet

@varrock Like my old friend used to say “rice beans and ammo”

Chill bro u r not an artist. In fact prompting an image and calling it art or work is offensive to real artists

@cometwtf Yo

If you are not a bot, reply and gain 100+ followers

@opensea me!

making a list who wants in?

@n0b0dy297932 @poordart @poordart this guy is on to something here

Brock Pierce was also strangely connected to the odd death of another crypto billionaire (Chris Mellon of the Mellon Banking dynasty; see BNY Mellon) Who was also trying to use blockchain tech to re imagine global banking. He mysteriously died of an ayahuasca overdose (first and only I've ever heard of) at a retreat Brock sent him to in Mexico. His death was also ruled no foul play.

This guy died 3 days after this tweet In retrospect, what if he was *not* crazy and did not kill himself?

@pudgypenguins Pengu Morning!

Anyone who says Pengu Morning below is getting put on a very special list 🐧

@pudgypenguins Pengu morning

Last one to comment “Pengu Morning” wins 🐧

Happy Pride Month to Ethereum Maxis

@pudgypenguins hey

Last one to comment gets 10k $PENGU.