BLM (Buster of Liberal Myths)

@Mintslice2 @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Please do. Be sure to show the full context while you are at it. Thanks.

@1classic_lib @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl I might make this my new display picture. LMFAO

The most cruel and sadistic comments you will ever receive are literally always from someone with a Bible verse in their bio

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl You are one pathetic sad sack. The "general welfare" clause has been egregiously abused and deliberately MISinterpreted beyond all logic, by "progressives", for over a century. So you lecturing me on the constitution, is like King George lecturing the FF on limited govt.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Article I section 8 "To tax and spend for the general welfare" You don't even know your own constitution, which is weird for a self-proclaimed constitutional conservative. Roads = constitutional Pensions = forcible confiscation Is totally bullshit unconstitional diahrea

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Of course the constitution was man made, imbecile. No one claimed otherwise. The aforementioned "enlightened thinkers" created it. They created it to protect God given/natural rights.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl A bunch of your founding fathers were enlightenment thinkers, and your constitution promotes a separation of church and state. They didn't believe your rights were "endowed by our creator".... is this a joke? The constitution was man made, not ordained by God.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Actually my ancestors had the exact same God given rights as me, they simply lacked a constitution that protected those rights. Is it starting to make sense yet? Maybe you need to get a book on the basics of the constitution.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl You just brought it up...... "Rights were endowed by our creator" No they fucking weren't Your ancestors had completely different rights to the people present in the bible. There's no objective rights m8. It's all man made. Hence why free speech wasn't in the constitution.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Wrong, dipshit, I never brought up religion, Are you ever right about anything? Stop trying to portray yourself as some great expert/defender of the constitution, if you can't even grasp/accept the basic premise.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Ffs, have you never heard of the concept of federalism?

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl You clearly need money to fund retirees and disabled people as well. If you had a disabled child and you were unable to work and provide them with money, would you agree that the public should contribute some of their income to ensure your child doesn't live in misery?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Yes. Also includes right to refuse: Whites Short people Mullet hair cuts Soccer fans Marxists Nazis... The great part is it is 2026, and businesses who tried this would suffer immensely, and people could simply go across the street and eat at Wendy's or Pizza Hut.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Lmfao. So mcdonalds should be legally allowed to refuse service to all black people just because they have black skin?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Again, owning slaves was never a constitutional individual liberty. As the matter of fact, laws that allowed for it were markedly unconstitutional. So it did not come at the expense of constitutional individual liberty, but the expense of unconstitutional legal slave ownership.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Individual slave owners had their freedom to own people removed, but WAY more people based on their group identity were given liberty. So is that an example of you not wanting social justice at the expense of individual liberty? Or?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Ffs, your perpetual need to ask leading questions w/ obvious answers, in order to obtain some big gotcha moment is crazy. Is this because I kept exposing your flaming hypocrisy? You need to seek out hypocrisy in my positions? Hint: everyone has some, mine are just less egregious

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Does removing people's ability to own slaves cause more harm to liberty than freeing slaves?

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk More "vibes".

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Buster of Myths? More like Buster of Moods. It’s not about the grammar, it’s about the fact that your 'evidence' is as imaginary as your restraint. But sure, keep a tally of my fallacies while you continue to cite 'the vibes' as your primary source.

Major

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Sorry my myth busting, busted your mood. Just because you can't operate your device, doesn't make the evidence imaginary. If it is not about the grammar, why did you make it about the grammar? I have cited exactly zero "vibes". Sounds like a possible "myth".

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Sorry, you can't work your device properly. My elderly senile aunt has the same problem. The "screenshot" is in fact a link. I can click on it, and it takes me right there. You have to click your mouse button or double tap your finger on it. google.com/search?smstk=C…

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk I’m looking, I’m looking! 👁️👄👁️ Still just seeing a tweet with zero links, zero citations, and a whole lot of 'trust me bro' energy disguised as a breakthrough. If the 'internal story' is so life-changing, feel free to drop the PDF instead of the riddles.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Oh boy, you got me on a grammar error made in haste. Gosh, you must feel so proud. You keep counting the grammar errors. I will keep counting your logical fallacies and bullshit.

"I didn't equate, I compared" — a distinction without a difference when the intent is to undermine institutional credibility with zero evidence. ​You’re right, you didn't say bloggers are gospel; you just treat them with the same uncritical faith. ​Next time you try to "bust a myth," try busting a dictionary first so you can learn the difference between your and you’re. 📖

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I'm sad that you don't understand the difference between comparing and equating. Do I "equate" the CDC to the Tobacco Institute? No. Do I "equate" their lies. No, I actually find the CDC lies to be far more egregious. Zero evidence? How can you be so damn naive? Leave the bubble

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I'm not asking you to "trust me, bro". I'm asking you to get out of your liberal bubble & open your damn eyes. No, this is not about shifting scientific consensus. This is about straight up lies. They said/did one thing internally, but gave the public an entirely different story.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Ah yes, the classic 'trust me bro' school of epidemiology. Equating shifting scientific consensus during a literal global emergency with a 'blatant lie' is a bold move. I guess updating guidance as new data arrives is 'hiding things' now? Stay curious.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Btw, it is kind of weird that you think math somehow negates your false assertions. Especially unrelated math that hasn't been shown.

No false assertions here, just basic math. ​Pointing out that your "rapid decline" data relied on unweighted raw data—a fundamental error in survey science—isn't "scoring points," it's correcting the record. ​You can trust "common sense" over calculators if you want, but the reality is that gender-diverse identification is following a standard statistical plateau, not a "frenzy" fade.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Skippy, you clearly made false assertions. 1) I never "equated" the CDC to the tobacco Institute. I compared. I semi-expected the CDC to not blatantly lie. 2) I never "effectively said" political bloggers are gospel. If your gonna spew fallacies, just own it.

Equating the CDC to the Tobacco Institute is a massive self-own. ​The Tobacco Institute was a private lobby designed to hide data; the CDC is a public body that publishes it. You’re effectively saying: "If an expert says it, it’s a lie; if a political blogger says it, it’s Gospel." ​That’s not 'critical thinking,' it’s a security blanket for your bias. The medical consensus didn't change just because you're still mad about masks.

@wyrdtrtle @HarrietBGarner @MarkCha75305548 @tommyboy0690 It's both that I have a problem with.

It isn't the pay of teachers that the unions should be disbanded for, it's the curriculum, or lack there of, that I fault them for. When you start teaching children to hate everything their parents and nation stood for, you destroy that nation. They have created a population of lemmings with no connection to their own past.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Again, feel free to share your peer reviewed data. I'll continue to wait. Then I will address this. Hint: you are coming up short.

Still waiting for you to explain the rapid decline." ​Here’s the explanation: Your "decline" was a math error. 📉 ​Eric Kaufmann's report used unweighted raw data. When independent researchers re-ran the numbers using standard survey weighting (you know, actual science), the "drop" vanished and showed a steady increase in gender-diverse identification. ​Imagine "busting myths" using a chart that any Intro to Stats student could debunk.