360disruption

For those asking what we do: I operate at the intersection of #innovation, #investment, and international #economic development. Through 360Disruption, we work with #companies, #investors, and #government stakeholders to turn breakthrough technologies into real-world economic capability across the #UAE, #GCC, #Africa and emerging global markets. Our focus is execution. • Commercializing advanced technologies • Structuring cross-border partnerships • Supporting national economic development initiatives • Building innovation and investment corridors From healthtech and advanced diagnostics to industrial innovation platforms, our work is about translating global innovation into national economic opportunity. 📍 #UAE based 🌍 Cross-border partnerships Global innovation is everywhere. Execution is rare. 🔗 360disruption.com

@saif_aldareei Proud to call the UAE home. 🇦🇪 It’s a country that gives opportunities, stability, and a sense of belonging—and I’m grateful to be part of its journey. Deep respect and appreciation to the leadership and the people who make this possible every day.

Deep appreciation to every resident who chose the UAE as home. Your trust means everything, and your presence is part of this nation’s success story. 🇦🇪

@rami_hashimi If this is a ‘ghost town,’ it’s the most operational ghost town in the world.

I'm currently in Dubai and the city feels like a ghost town. I walked through the JBR yesterday. The beach was half empty on a Thursday. That never happens. Tens of thousands of expats and tourists have left since the war started. That's not a rumor — The Guardian reported it. Hotels that were charging $600 a night are now calling you. Offering deals. Begging, basically. A travel agent friend said overseas bookings into Dubai are down 80–92%. That's the official number. On the ground it feels worse. Airlines are rerouting around UAE airspace. Emirates has suspended more routes than they've admitted publicly — ask anyone working at the airport. The malls are open but the energy is gone. Luxury brands with no customers. Restaurants half-staffed because the foreign workers are leaving too. I know 4 British families who've sent their kids home "just for a few weeks." That's what they say. But they're not bringing stuff back. The hotels are still lit up, the Burj Khalifa still glows at night. But the people aren't here anymore. And the ones who stayed are keeping one bag packed, just in case.

@Sajwani @Khalifa1 Breaking: Dr. Anjo of @360disruption files for compensation — not for infrastructure, but for the time, focus, and sanity lost due to Iran’s missile hobby over the UAE 🇦🇪

We destroyed their 2,000+ drones and rockets and now they’re crying for a compensation 🤣 What a clown regime 🤡

@araghchi Calling it ‘restraint’ while targeting regional infrastructure doesn’t exactly build credibility brother.

Our response to Israel's attack on our infrastructure employed FRACTION of our power. The ONLY reason for restraint was respect for requested de-escalation. ZERO restraint if our infrastructures are struck again. Any end to this war must address damage to our civilian sites.

@Dr_BuAbdullah Proud to be part of that spirit 🇦🇪❤️

We are all UAE… 🇦🇪 A nation that unites us, no matter our nationalities.

@brockpierson Highly appreciated

I am blowing all super small accounts Reply if you're under 5k and I will boost you 🚀

@AhmedSharif Proud to be part of that spirit 🇦🇪❤️

Everyone is indeed Emirati🇦🇪❤️

issuewire.com/global-health-… #dubai #Abudhabi #uae #health #execution @Ajman_Chamber @AjmanFreeZone @UmmAlQuwainCham @UAQFTZA @myrakez @DubaiDET @DxbChamberComm @hub71ad @InvestAbuDhabi #makeitintheemirates #oda

Calling multiple sovereign countries ‘legitimate targets’ because they host foreign bases isn’t law — it’s escalation dressed up as legal language. By that logic, half the world would be responsible for conflicts they don’t control. This isn’t about accountability. It’s about expanding the playing field. I stand proud with the 🇦🇪

Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations said in separate letters to the UN secretary-general and the Security Council president that Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates had allowed their territory to be used for attacks against Iran, state media reported on Thursday. Amir Saeid Iravani said in the letters that any military bases or facilities used to launch or support armed attacks on Iran could be considered legitimate military targets under its right to self-defense. He added that Iran reserved the right to take necessary measures to prevent further casualties and damage. Iravani also wrote that the UAE’s alleged role in allowing US attacks from its territory had given rise to international responsibility and required reparations, including compensation for all material and moral damage inflicted on Iran.

@0xsh_lk @Reuren95 0xab7449632141470b1a2b29cd277ed0cfb1f672a5

MAX // 2026X ------------------------- [ SUPPLY : 666 ] [ STATUS : READY ] [ CHAIN : ETHEREUM ] ------------------------- ACTION_REQUIRED: LIKE & RT DROP ETH WALLET

Everyone talks about power in this region. But real power isn’t reacting. It’s choosing when not to. The #Gulf states are being tested — energy infrastructure targeted, pressure rising, provocations increasing. And still… restraint. Not because they can’t respond. But because they understand the cost of escalation better than anyone else. War in this region doesn’t stay contained. It spreads — economically, politically, globally. So while others operate in cycles of strike and counterstrike, the Gulf is doing something far more difficult: Holding the line. That’s not weakness. That’s control. I stand proudly with the 🇦🇪 | Observing the world from the #UAE — where stability, innovation and reality matters. | #Geopolitics #OSINT #Innovation #360disruption #UAE #Dubai #Geopolitics #InformationWar #FutureEconomy #abudhabi #emirates #GulfRegion #GCC #WeAreEmirati #GlobalStrategy #gcc #IranWar‌ #restraint #qatar #saudi #WeAreAllEmirati

@PetitPoulet75 @MarioNawfal They cited 3 individuals

@360disruption @MarioNawfal The Washington Post broke the story with 3 sources.

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Drones detected over the base where Secretary of State Rubio and Defense Secretary Hegseth live. Multiple domestic military bases locked down. The U.S. just issued a global security alert for all diplomatic posts overseas. The war in Iran isn't 7,000 miles away anymore. Unidentified drones are now flying over the homes of the two officials most responsible for running it. Source: Washington Post

@PetitPoulet75 @MarioNawfal Reuters could not independently verify the report ​immediately.

@360disruption @MarioNawfal Does Reuters and the Washington Post make it true? reuters.com/world/us/us-de…

Let’s separate facts from propaganda. The Soleimani strike was a U.S. operation, ordered and executed by the United States — not Qatar. Hosting a U.S. base does not make a country responsible for every American military decision. By that logic, half the world would be ‘guilty.’ Meanwhile, today’s reality is simple: Qatar is being targeted by missiles and drones. So maybe drop the revisionist narrative and stick to facts.

When this war is over, the Qatari dictatorship will be forced to pay full reparations for the crimes this US proxy enabled against the Iranian people. The assault on Iran began with the drones that flew from Doha to murder General Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.

Statements like ‘the world is done with Iran’ reflect frustration — but they oversimplify a much more complex reality. There is, undeniably, growing global fatigue with instability, escalation, and the repeated targeting of critical infrastructure across the region. At the same time, it’s important to distinguish between: • a country • its leadership • and its people Because they are not the same. Many Iranians themselves have expressed deep dissatisfaction with economic conditions, governance, and the direction of the country. Which creates a paradox: Externally, frustration is rising. Internally, pressure is building. But globally, there is still little appetite for full-scale war. That leaves us in a fragile space — where escalation continues, but resolution remains out of reach. The real question isn’t who people are ‘done with.’ It’s whether anyone involved is willing to change course before the situation forces it. “Because history shows: when pressure builds on both the inside and the outside — something eventually gives.” | Observing the world from the #UAE — where stability, innovation and reality matters. | #Geopolitics #OSINT #Innovation #360disruption #UAE #Dubai #Geopolitics #InformationWar #FutureEconomy #abudhabi #emirates #GulfRegion #GCC #WeAreEmirati #GlobalStrategy #iran #iranwar #WeAreAllEmirati #restraint #resilience #escalation #qatar #saudi #breaking

Calling this ‘strategy’ is generous. This is escalation driven by pride, pressure, and the inability to step back without losing face. Iran hits infrastructure to hurt the global economy. The West responds to maintain dominance. Everyone signals strength. No one signals restraint. And the Gulf? It becomes the pressure valve. Not because it’s the battlefield — but because it’s what actually hurts. This isn’t a plan. It’s a loop. And loops don’t end well. | Observing the world from the #UAE — where stability, innovation and reality matters. | #Geopolitics #OSINT #Innovation #360disruption #UAE #Dubai #Geopolitics #InformationWar #FutureEconomy #abudhabi #emirates #GulfRegion #GCC #WeAreEmirati #GlobalStrategy #iran #IranWar‌ #restraint #resilience #qatar

@D_alkamali Amen

نتوكل على الله في دفع هذا العدوان فاللهم اصرف عنا كيدهم ومكرهم وشتت شملهم وفرق كلمتهم... لا حول لنا ولا قوة إلا بك أنت حسبنا نعم المولى ونعم النصير... اللهم احفظ الإمارات وبلاد الخليج وسدد رمي جنودنا الأبطال وأعنهم وانصرهم ووفقهم

@Osint613 Targeting energy infrastructure isn’t strategy — it’s escalation. And escalation always has consequences. The region doesn’t need more instability — but it won’t ignore it either.

Saudi FM Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud: "Today, two refineries in Riyadh were attacked. What's the purpose of that? The Iranians will have to understand that this has consequences."

Selective history makes for compelling narratives — not accurate ones. Yes, NATO and coalition forces have struck infrastructure in past conflicts. But those were classified as dual-use targets, tied to military operations — not random civilian punishment. That doesn’t make them perfect. It makes them accountable to a framework. The danger in your argument is clear: If every past inconsistency becomes justification, then no standard remains — for anyone. And that’s a far more dangerous world. Just my two cents on this very complicated topic.

European leaders constantly call for a [moratorium on strikes targeting energy and water facilities,] insisting that civilian needs must be protected from war. Yet history tells a different story. In 1999, during the intervention in Yugoslavia, NATO forces systematically targeted electric grids and energy infrastructure. Entire cities were plunged into darkness. Water systems failed. Hospitals struggled to operate. The result was not just military pressure but civilian paralysis. In 2003, the invasion of Iraq led by the United States and the United Kingdom saw power plants and water systems disabled early in the campaign. The collapse of electricity meant the collapse of water purification, healthcare, and daily life for millions. In 2011, during the Libya intervention, again under NATO command, fuel depots and electricity networks were struck, triggering widespread shortages and long-term instability in basic services. In Afghanistan, across two decades of NATO presence, civilian infrastructure from roads to power facilities was repeatedly damaged, whether intentionally or as "collateral." And in the war against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, coalition forces including European states targeted oil fields and energy facilities, knowing full well that such systems serve both militants and civilians. The Pattern Is Clear, the principle is always the same: When they act, it is called necessity. When others act, it is called a violation. When European leaders now speak of protecting civilian infrastructure, they are not speaking from a consistent moral position. They are speaking from selective memory to save Iran's Islamist jihadist regime. Because the same actors who call for restraint today have, in the past: Approved strikes on power grids Disabled water systems Targeted energy lifelines essential for civilian survival. This is not an accusation. It is a record. European discourse often frames Iranian energy resources oil and gas, as if they represent the prosperity or welfare of the Iranian people. This is fundamentally misleading. Iranian citizens do not meaningfully benefit from these resources. Wealth is concentrated within the Islamic regime’s power structure. Energy, in this context, is not a civilian lifeline it is a political and military instrument. If the protection of civilians is truly a universal principle, it must apply: In Europe’s wars, in America’s coalitions, in Middle Eastern conflicts, Everywhere, without exception Otherwise, it is not a principle. It is a tool of convenience. The issue is not whether protecting civilian infrastructure is right, it is. The issue is whether those who speak about it today have consistently upheld it. The historical record suggests otherwise. And until that contradiction is acknowledged, every new statement about "protecting civilians" from European leaders will carry less weight not because the principle is weak, but because its advocates have been.