社工库查询酒店开房记录微信聊天记录手机定位支付宝实名登记车辆信息 身份证号手机号码微博绑定行踪轨迹 ретвитнул
社工库查询酒店开房记录微信聊天记录手机定位支付宝实名登记车辆信息 身份证号手机号码微博绑定行踪轨迹
1.4K posts

社工库查询酒店开房记录微信聊天记录手机定位支付宝实名登记车辆信息 身份证号手机号码微博绑定行踪轨迹
@808iden
客服:(第一次进不去就退到主页点第二次)或QQ群:906176457
客服 Присоединился Aralık 2018
17 Подписки3.1K Подписчики
社工库查询酒店开房记录微信聊天记录手机定位支付宝实名登记车辆信息 身份证号手机号码微博绑定行踪轨迹 ретвитнул
社工库查询酒店开房记录微信聊天记录手机定位支付宝实名登记车辆信息 身份证号手机号码微博绑定行踪轨迹 ретвитнул

@SemanticCapital @NoLimitGains dude he’s not taking the money himself idiot
English

Oh, look! Another day, another episode of “Who Needs the Law When You Have Caps Lock?” 🏛️💨
The Supreme Court basically told Trump, “Hey, maybe don’t use a 1977 emergency law like a personal piggy bank,” and his response is the political equivalent of “I’m telling my mom on you.” He’s literally threatening higher tariffs out of spite. At this rate, we’ll be paying a 50% luxury tax just to look at a picture of an imported avocado. 🥑📉
English

🚨 DONALD TRUMP JUST POSTED THIS
He just threatened to escalate the tariff war even further.
Here’s everything you need to know.
The Supreme Court just ruled his tariffs illegal under the 1977 IEEPA law.
Trump responded within minutes.
He’s now threatening any country that tries to enforce that ruling with tariffs higher than what was already agreed to.
Not the same tariffs, but HIGHER ones.
Plus “worse” consequences he refused to specify.
He signed it off with “BUYER BEWARE” in all caps. That’s a warning to markets too.
The economy is already fragile, earnings are slowing, and consumer spending is down massively.
On top of that, credit card debt just hit record highs.
Supply chains that barely survived the last trade war are about to get hit again.
Companies that import raw materials are about to watch their margins collapse.
The next few days/weeks will be extremely volatile, but don’t worry, I’ll keep you updated on everything.
I’ve been here for more than 20 years, and when I make a new move in the market, I’ll say it here publicly because I want you to win.
A lot of people will regret not following me.

English

@WhineAndDivine @ibrycecrawford he did not
English

@ibrycecrawford I wonder if you asked brain dead questions about “worshipping Mary” or “works based salvation” to Fr. Lazarus… I’ll withhold judgement until I watch it, but I’m not optimistic.
English

🚨Father Lazarus Podcast Episode🚨
-
Today’s podcast episode is with my new friend and Priest, Father Lazarus! Father and I sit down to discuss why tradition is so important in the church, the weight of the Eucharist, and Jesus Christ.
To watch/listen to this interview search up “Bryce Crawford Podcast” on YouTube/Spotify/Apple❤️🔥

English

@freepeeper it’s not white . it’s j****
English

Yesterday in @JudiciaryGOP, @AGPamBondi hurled personal insults instead of answering my legitimate questions about major gaps and serious flaws in the Epstein Files Transparency Act document production.
English

@Oliver18945910 @AntiWokeMemes I do. How is this not a Christian view?
English

@Invest_Brandon @saylor This is a marathon not a one mile walk. Think bigger
English

@saylor You been DCAing in for 5 years and basically even with your basis… not impressive. SP500 beat you
English

@saylor Your incredible. I’m 21 and you are a hero to me ❤️ I like bitcoin but I Believe in STRATEGY
English

@BTCtreasuries lucky for me i just started buying
English

@Glitchymagic @MaxCrypto If you have any clue about chart patterns and volume drop off, BTC is currently printing a bear flag pattern. The draw down was 36 percent from ATH’s and the extension should be similar bringing price down to $52k ish. Good luck.
English

@AMSchindler1983 @saylor not true
English

@saylor You just listed a bunch of tech that had real world utility. The number of Bitcoin wallets with 0.1 or more BTC has fallen by ~30% over the last 18 months. The utility of BTC is as a vehicle of speculation.
English

@cryptosymbiiote very good analysis actually very clever🙌
English

@rambenzeev @PeterSchiff @saylor you guys are slow, he didn’t say he wants to buy all the bitcoin🤣 he said that the bitcoin he owns is “out of circulation” because he will never sell it, that was the point if you actually watched it you’d know that , or maybe you did watch it and your just not intelligent
English

Michael Saylor has now reached the point where the hype is no longer merely optimistic — it is economically incoherent. The statement that he intends to “take Bitcoin out of circulation,” use it as collateral for “digital credit,” and in doing so “strip the risk out of Bitcoin” while “guaranteeing a perpetual 10% return” collapses under even the most basic scrutiny.
First, you cannot remove the risk from an asset whose price is entirely dependent on speculative demand. Bitcoin does not produce cashflow, earnings, dividends, or yield. Its valuation is driven solely by market psychology. Collateralising such an asset does not eliminate its volatility — it magnifies exposure. The moment you borrow against a volatile asset, you introduce liquidation risk, counterparty risk, and systemic risk. This is Finance 101.
Second, the notion that one can “buy all the Bitcoin” is mathematically impossible. The moment anyone attempts to purchase even a fraction of circulating supply for cash, the price spikes. Attempting to acquire the entire supply would require infinite capital because no rational holder would sell a finite asset to a buyer openly signalling he intends to corner the market. This is not a business strategy; it is a fantasy of market monopoly that cannot exist in an open market.
Third, the idea that Bitcoin-backed credit could “guarantee a perpetual 10% return” is not merely false — it is dangerous. A guaranteed return can only exist when there is a risk-free asset underpinning the system, such as sovereign debt from a solvent state. Bitcoin is not risk-free. It has lost more than half its value multiple times. The claim of a “perpetual 10% return” is therefore indistinguishable from the marketing language of a leveraged scheme: the yield does not emerge from the asset; it emerges from taking on further debt.
Finally, Saylor’s framing that removing Bitcoin from circulation makes it “better collateral” misunderstands what collateral must be. Collateral must be both liquid and stable. An asset that is removed from circulation loses liquidity. An asset that is highly volatile lacks stability. Combining illiquidity and volatility does not reduce risk; it compounds it.
In essence, Saylor is describing a system in which:
1. he borrows against a volatile asset,
2. uses leverage to accumulate more of that asset, and
3. justifies the expansion of debt by promising future gains that depend entirely on the price of that same asset rising.
There is a name for this structure, and it is not “innovation.” It is cascading leverage built on speculative collateral — the precise model that has collapsed every time it has been attempted, in every market, across recorded financial history.
The public should treat these pronouncements as what they are: promotional myths designed to sustain demand, justify leverage, and disguise risk. No retail investor should mistake them for sound financial reasoning.
RAM
English

In his Bitcoin MENA keynote, @saylor said his goal is to take Bitcoin out of circulation by buying it all, then using that Bitcoin as collateral to create digital credit. He claimed this strategy strips the risk out of Bitcoin while guaranteeing a perpetual 10% return. Total BS.
English
















