Irving

@XiaopengKing 老铁这该怎么办？x.com/blockview0214/…

X 上冷启动阶段是最困难的， 因为基础粉丝和账号权重太低了， 我发现很多账号粉丝和权重到了一定程度后， 涨粉就变得十分容易了， 每天都可以涨上百个粉丝， 只要保持高互动， 粉丝的粘性也会十分高。 所以那些还没起来的账号， 保持每天出摊节奏， 一起熬过这段最难的时光吧！

一觉醒来这是什么情况？我是该回关呢还是删除呢？

@quxiaoyin Sam just saying 20$ is a good deal 😓

Claude code is way too overpriced. I spent $2 in DeepSeek v4. Same task $150 usd.

@3orovik When most people sleeping

One day Bitcoin will pump $10,000 in one candle No one is ready for that

@Rajatsoni Just ignore.

Some people will be saying Bitcoin is a scam, even when it's $10M+

@burkov Closed AI labs pour billions in, only for public research to commoditize it in weeks. No lock-in means customers always chase the cheapest version. Just look at robotic dogs.

No matter how hard you, as a closed private company, try to build the strongest AI model, and no matter how much you spend on achieving your goal, public research scientists will discover your science virtually weeks after your technology is seen. And given that you don't have any vendor lock-in, clients will go where it's cheaper. And given that your competitors will get the same tech for free from public research, it will be cheaper at your competitors. Just look at the robotic dogs. Boston Dynamics invested hundreds of millions into their robotic dog. Now, Chinese companies sell them for the price of a scooter because they just saw how it had to be done. And this is robotics, where you can file and enforce a patent.

@Vaccaria_W 排队申请

MIMO的一次大羊毛，最高100T的token。快来薅一下，简单点，不废话。这是罗福莉访谈之后的一次小动作。 直接看链接，如果你感兴趣，那么就来尝试申请一下看看。很简单。 第一步：只需要填写你的邮箱， 第二步：选择你常用的智能体：openclaw或者Hermes或者其他 第三步：写一下Agent 或 AI 驱动构建的具体成果。 剩余就可以等着审核即可。 新鲜出炉的，从今天开始倒计时30天，统计结束。我觉得大家都在用AI，多少都会有一个自己的Agent在尝试吧？ 邀请你参加 Xiaomi MiMo Orbit 百万亿 Token 创造者激励计划，100T Credits 面向全球用户限时发放中... 100t.xiaomimimo.com

@aakashgupta Jensen was happier in his 20s because he didn’t know the odds were impossible. The best founders survive by getting the math wrong — optimism as a load-bearing feature.

Jensen Huang says he was happier in his 20s than he is now. The reason is not what you think. He wasn't happier because NVIDIA was smaller, or because the work was simpler, or because he had less money on the line. He was happier because he was ignorant of how impossible the thing he was attempting actually was. His exact phrasing: he thought his 20s were happier, and looking back, the reason was that he didn't know enough to be afraid. If he had understood the real probability of building NVIDIA into what it became, he would have quit. The math on a fabless GPU startup in 1993 trying to compete with 30 incumbents was negative expected value. Anyone who modeled it correctly walked away. So the founders who survived were the ones who modeled it wrong. This is the part that gets misread as motivational content. Jensen is describing a structural feature of how breakthrough companies actually get built. Optimism is not a mood. Optimism is a cognitive error that lets you keep showing up while better-informed people exit. The error is load-bearing. Without it, the company doesn't exist. NVIDIA almost died three times in the 90s before the GeForce 256 worked. RIVA 128 shipped late, RIVA TNT was a bet-the-company release, Microsoft's DirectX nearly killed the entire 3D accelerator category. Every one of those moments was a place where a rational founder would have sold or shut down. Jensen didn't, because he didn't fully understand the odds he was facing. The deeper point: every company worth building is one where the founder had to be wrong about the odds to start it. The accurate forecasters self-select out at the planning stage. What gets built is whatever the optimists were willing to attempt while everyone smarter said no. Jensen's $4 trillion company is a 30-year compounding return on being wrong about how hard it would be.

@windsurf One-click project-wide search and edit with Claude 4 Opus or Sonnet. This is how you actually ship fast on large codebases.

Devin for Terminal is available for all Windsurf users, and can even be used directly from Windsurf Next.

@AltcoinDaily the longer they push, the harder it will pop. Long-term holders aren’t selling. The squeeze is building.

Bitcoin price is being suppressed. Bitcoin Conference haters are doing everything they can to dump the price and ruin sentiment. Like a beachball being held under the ocean this has to break eventually... right?

@venturetwins Coding agents are killing patience for bad software. No more excuses for missing features or constant bugs. Just run an agent overnight and fix it. The bar for decent apps just went way up.

One weird side effect of coding agents is I have much less patience for shitty software. There are no more excuses for a website / app to be lacking basic features or consistently buggy. Put your agent on it overnight!

BITCOIN 2026 DAY 1 LIVESTREAM 🚀 twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@TheBitcoinConf SEC Chair Paul Atkins greenlighting on-chain tokenization experiments in the next few weeks? The $62T U.S. market is finally opening the doors. This could be the real catalyst for mainstream Bitcoin and crypto adoption. Bullish.

🇺🇸 SEC CHAIR PAUL ATKINS SAYS COMPANIES WILL BE ABLE TO "EXPERIMENT ON-CHAIN WITH TOKENIZATION" IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS 👀 THE $62 TRILLION U.S. MARKET IS READY FOR #BITCOIN & CRYPTO 🚀

@YounesAka @github Same question

@github why isn't GPT-5.5 included in #model-multipliers-for-annual-copilot-pro-and-copilot-pro-subscribers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.github.com/en/copilot/ref…

Starting June 1st, GitHub Copilot will move to a usage-based billing model as GitHub Copilot supports more agentic and advanced workflows. In early May, you'll see a preview bill experience, giving visibility into projected costs before the transition. 👉 Read more about the upcoming change: github.blog/news-insights/…

GitHub Copilot moving to usage-based billing from June 1st. The cheap fixed subscription that made it popular is ending as agentic workflows increase costs. Many devs are already eyeing Cursor or Codex instead.

@GergelyOrosz GitHub Copilot moving to usage-based billing from June 1st. The cheap fixed subscription that made it popular is ending as agentic workflows increase costs. Many devs are already eyeing Cursor or Codex instead.

Its the beginning of the end of subsidized AI subscriptions. GH Copilot is moving to usage-based billing, as has Claude (for business customers.) Fair to assume more will follow. I expect this change will also be a great boost for open models - cheaper, and pretty good already

@ibrewcookie Bitcoin on chain whale monitoring.

@BlockView0214 这个whalealert是什么

🚨 Smart Money on the Move today. #Bitcoin #WhaleAlert #Crypto

丝滑跑通了自动化comment x 以及 comment douyin 有没有不怕封号的可以试用。涨粉速度是真快，风险也是真高。github.com/www222fff/open…

@ibrewcookie 那倒可行

@BlockView0214 瓶装的椰子水

跟消费品行业的朋友聊天，听到一个让我后背发凉的事： 市面上99%的椰子水是假的。不是”掺了点东西”那种假，是里面压根没有椰子，就是糖精兑水。 更离谱的是，这事儿哪怕315曝光了也没用——因为目前没有国家统一检测标准。没标准，就没法认定，没法认定，就没法处罚。 结果就是经典的劣币驱逐良币：假椰子水成本极低，真椰子水根本卷不过，慢慢也被逼着”变假”。

@ibrewcookie 可是椰子壳是硬的呀打进去的？

@BlockView0214 没错，是这样的，就是糖精兑水。。