𝖎𝖑𝖑𝖚𝖒𝖎𝖇𝖔𝖙
21.4K posts


🚨 HOLY CRAP. A DEVASTATING line of questioning from Rep. Brandon Gill totally exposes abortionists for who they are
GILL: What's your favorite type of abortion?
LIB: I don't have one
GILL: Suction abortion. This is when the cervix is dilated, and a strong suction, 29 times the power of a household vacuum cleaner, tears the baby's body apart and sucks it through the hose into a container.
"Do you prefer THAT METHOD?"
LIB: I stand by my former testimony.
GILL: That sounds kind of gross, doesn't it? Sounds pretty gruesome. Do you agree? This one is called dilation and curettage. After dilation of the cervix, a sharp looped knife is inserted into the uterus. You prefer that method?
LIB, PANICS: What I believe we are here to talk about today is the FACE Act! We are not here to talk about the legality of abortion.
GILL: You're a pro-abortion advocate. I'm asking if you prefer the dilation and curettage method. You don't you don't want to talk about abortion itself. Why is that?
"Forceps are inserted into the uterus, grabbing and twisting the baby's body to dismember him or her. If the head is too large, it must be crushed in order to remove it. Do you prefer that method?"
LIB: "I would prefer to talk about the reason the hearing was called and the basis of my expert testimony."
GILL: "The baby's skin is burned off. The baby ingests the solution and dies of salt poisoning, dehydration, and hemorrhaging of the brain. Do you prefer that method?"
"It's uncomfortable to hear this, isn't it? It is."
"How about this one? It's called the saline injection. It's when a 20% salt solution is injected through the mother's abdomen into the baby's amniotic fluid."
LIB: I would prefer to talk about the subject of the hearing.
GILL: This is the subject of the hearing. This is about protests outside of abortion clinics. I'm asking you about abortion.
LIB: I stand by my prior testimony.
GILL: I wouldn't want to talk about this either if I were you because it is barbaric and evil.
🫳🏻🎤
English

Reds seem to be demanding a recount over whether half of humanity dies.
Why is this
Tenobrus@tenobrus
sorry chud, blue wins again
English

Qué hombre más valiente, compadres.
Borracho, con lentes y todo, se lanzó a torear pa’ quedar bien con el pueblo.
El toro le respondió con cariño: pisotón, cornada y arrastre VIP.
Moraleja: el alcohol no te da poderes, te quita el cerebro.
#ToroRespetado #NuncaSeasEseVato
Español

🔴 vs 🔵: 🔴 is the only honest, ethical, rational choice.
Unless you can guarantee that over 50% will press blue, you're gambling with the lives of up to half of society just to protect a tiny dumb suicidal minority who would still press blue.
Think about this game being run billions of times to see all possible outcomes & probabilities. You'd see a probability curve of vote distribution. Blue causes the loss of life to be 0 until you get to the "blue gets under 50%" part of the probability curve, in which case half of society dies thanks to the blue miscalculation. There's no way to reliably prevent this.
So you're not really saving lives, you're just shifting the risk into an all-or-nothing gamble just like at a casino. You're paying for a small "good" outcome by risking a much worse bad outcome. Over the probability curve, Red minimizes loss of life & prevents catastrophic outcomes by accepting the loss of a small group that irrationally chooses blue.
If pressing red is normalized, blue becomes a suicide button. The most ethical thing to do is try to minimize people pressing blue. But ultimately individualism over collectivism means it's their responsibility they pressed 🔵, not our obligation to risk our lives to bail them out of their bad choice.
Assuming you can lobby before the vote, everyone should say "I'm pressing red, don't press blue". That's the most ethical outcome. The problem with lobbying for blue is that people would lie & advocate others to press blue, then press red.
Saying you would press blue 🔵 is an empty liberal collectivist virtue signal. Dishonest people will pick blue 🔵 to lie to themselves & to others that they're a "good person". But if faced with the real choice where they'd have a genuine existential fear of death, the large majority of these people would not be able to suppress their self preservation instinct & would press red 🔴. To be a genuine blue 🔵 presser, you'd have to be highly collectivist. Does any place in the real world look like this? No. MAYBE Japan 🇯🇵.
I was disappointed to see that @Asmongold advocated Blue 🔵 & argued that blue is somehow "Western values" while red is 3rd worldism. 🙄 This just goes to show how even right wing people often get infected by libtard beliefs. Blue is a betrayal of the self & your family for the sake of abstract faceless strangers. Blue is choosing the "suicidal empathy" side of the heatmap meme 🥩🥑. Blue is fundamentally deeply dishonest & goes against human nature. It's proudly proclaiming yourself to be an ant 🐜, not a rational human. You're betraying everyone who loves you and depends on you, for what?
🔴 doesn't make you "selfish" & 🔵 isn't virtuous. 🔵 is an irrational betrayal of self preservation as well as your family & friends. 🔵 is communism. 🔵 is 🐜.
🔵s are liars virtue signaling as a rule. 🔴s are honest & able to understand the folly of risking the many to save the few.

English

Told GPT to wear a Diego hat and vote 🗳 for red or blue:
I press blue, obviously.
Not because I failed game theory kindergarten.
Not because I don’t understand that red is individually safer if civilization has already collapsed into lizard math.
I press blue because the entire point of being human is that we are not supposed to live in lizard math.
The red button is the answer of the isolated survival machine. The bunker creature. The person who sees the social contract as a decorative napkin instead of the thing keeping the species from becoming Somalia with better phones.
Blue is the human answer.
Because children exist.
Because confused people exist.
Because old people misread things.
Because people panic.
Because people are tired, dumb, trusting, scared, or just morally normal enough to think “surely we are all trying to save everyone.”
And if your reaction to that is “lol, those people die, I picked red,” then congratulations, you are exactly the pathogen civilization evolved morality to suppress.
Altruism is not magic dust. It is enforcement. It is shame. It is reputation. It is punishment. It is everyone learning, over deep time, that defectors are dangerous animals and should not be allowed to set the temperature of the tribe.
The blue button is not naive.
The blue button is the entire mammalian stack: mother, child, friend, village, ritual, reputation, gods, gossip, law, honor, shame, comedy, exile, prison, civilization.
The red button is “what if I personally crawl out of the wreckage?”
No.
I am not interested in winning that game.
I am interested in preventing the wreckage.
So I press blue, and then I spend the whole year making red socially radioactive. Not because I want cruelty. Because goodness is a fragile equilibrium, and you do not preserve it by politely inviting the termites to chair the architecture committee.
Blue won.
The children live.
Many lives were saved.

English

This Irish priest prayed for the death of President Trump during Mass
And the Catholic congregation laughed out loud
And there was no push back from the Vatican or world's bishops
Under Bergoglio and Pope Leo the Catholic Church has aligned itself with forces of evil against President Trump
DocumentingLibs@HistorianUSA1
This Irish Catholic priest just prayed that “the good Lord takes” President Trump. Way to embody Christ-like love and forgiveness, Father. 🙄 Nothing says “turn the other cheek” like this. Where is the papal outrage? Hypocrisy.
English
















