Final Fantasy XIV.7.0 re: New World Explorer

15.3K posts

Final Fantasy XIV.7.0 re: New World Explorer banner
Final Fantasy XIV.7.0 re: New World Explorer

Final Fantasy XIV.7.0 re: New World Explorer

@Lightless_Day

Plays KH and FF14 (Endwalker spoilers) Attack on titan enjoyer. This site sucks, don't use it. Except for the art I guess.

Sharlyan Присоединился Ağustos 2017
132 Подписки73 Подписчики
Zenith
Zenith@ZenithTheNinja·
@thelukadoncic How to ruin a character: make her fat
English
72
3
33
1.3M
not jo
not jo@thelukadoncic·
just had the nightmare that if they do adapt thick Eve they're gonna have her in the worst fits imaginable bruh if they can't dress a skinny woman imagine a plus size 💔💔💔
hao@hao0047

i dontt care eve is so cute ! #INVINCIBLE

English
31
876
27.1K
640.9K
pluh
pluh@pluto_cronus·
Robert Kirkman gotta answer if they had gay viltrumites
English
129
211
6K
88K
Christian Kim 🇺🇸
Christian Kim 🇺🇸@ChristianKimUSA·
@BasedMikeLee That phrase is what gets me confused: Is it foreigners and aliens who are children of ambassadors, etc.? Or is Senator Howard separating each group - foreigners, aliens, children of ambassadors, etc.?
English
20
0
4
2K
Soulince4442
Soulince4442@soulince4442·
@Omni_Oliver Probably because Conquest was capable of defending himself. She can only fight unarmed civilians, starving children and women
English
6
11
675
15.7K
C10
C10@C10_ten·
@nocontextnvncbl I need her to get back with my boy Nolan man. Show mercy on him
English
9
0
14
14.9K
No Context Invincible
No Context Invincible@nocontextnvncbl·
Younger Debbie was straight to the point
English
82
1.2K
28.8K
4.9M
Sethy
Sethy@Brizksie·
GIVE SANDRA OH HER EMMY RIGHT NOWWWW
English
139
3.6K
32.8K
575.2K
Marvel
Marvel@marcvelitrae·
@TotalDepravity0 @Lightless_Day @Acyn Then they decided Wong incorrectly. The subject clause was supposed to be about allegiance too, not just criminal liability for being on US soil.
English
1
0
1
25
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Barrett: If you're looking at parents and if you're looking at parents domicile, then you have to adjudicate both residents and intent to stay. What if you don't know who the parents are? Sauer: I think there are marginal cases. That one, I think has the benefit of being addressed in 1401F Barrett: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. But what about the constitution?
English
56
416
3K
405K
Marvel
Marvel@marcvelitrae·
It most certainly does. "Subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means more than committing crimes. It also means your country of allegiance according to the authors. Someone with a green card is declaring they are switching allegiance from their home country to the US. That requires mutual agreement between them and the US govt. Those on non-immigrant visas or illegal aliens have not switched allegiance away from their home country.
English
3
0
3
189
S
S@normalgrlsolene·
Can’t get over how, when Naruto uses the Sexy Jutsu, he basically just turns into multiple copies of himself as the same stereotypical girl but when he does the reverse harem jutsu, he creates a whole lineup of different attractive guys. Like, he really couldn’t just pick one.
S tweet media
English
94
1K
17.3K
472K
Marvel
Marvel@marcvelitrae·
@Acyn "Intent to stay" is determined factually. If they have a green card/immigrant visa they intend to stay permanently. If they have a non-immigrant visa or no visa at all they don't, at least not one agreed by the US.
English
6
0
6
5.7K