
Wasn’t the clinical definition of Long-COVID precisely defined by “something bad happens anytime after being infected with Sars-CoV-2”? Isn’t LC now recognized as “viral infection induced injury”. And isn’t LC being attributed to the virulence of the spike protein from the virus.? And yet, when there is substantial evidence from numerous papers all showing long term persistence of spike from the vaccine, this is dismissed? Not to mention the vaccine also introduces DNA byproducts from vaccine manufacturing… and that’s dismissed as well? Why dismiss the virulence of the spike from the vaccine but not from the virus?




















