Namejs R

@mc_swm I can fix him

They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. Anyone whose ever seen an insane person would quickly realize that the insane person's defining characteristic is actually doing a great number of different things without it really being clear what they're expecting. Insane people are not good to committing to something over a long period of time. Their minds are too lateral, doing the work of connecting everything to everything else. This is a definition cooked up by somebody with Autism (which is a hyper-rational anti-insanity that's so extreme it becomes a mental illness because you're actually supposed to be a little bit insane) and was almost certainly not coined by Albert Einstein who was at the very least ALSO schizotypal. AudHD is very hot right now among millenials and zoomers, autism plus ADHD. The autism explains the vertical lock-in hyperfocus and the ADHD explains the lateral jumps and inability to commit. Never mind any amount of the symptomatology that is just being medicated with skyhigh doses of vyvanse that's accentuating the lock-in along with feelings of euphoria, that's neither here-nor-there. I have my own cute little word for my cluster of symptoms: schizophreniADHD. Schizophrenia is defined by its positive symptoms: hallucinations, odd-thinking, delusions; these are added to the baseline human state. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are the inverse—they are what is taken away. Anhedonia, withdrawal, and worst of all: lack of focus. My ability to intentionally repeat tasks between days has been shot. Never mind any amount of the symptomatology that is just cyberpsychosis and cyberADHD (everything feels like mental illness when the wires wrapped around the amygdala creep down into your soul); that's neither here-nor-there. I am insane. I have always been insane. I have never not been insane. I am familiar with insanity. And it is not doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. I would maybe shift that over to being the definition for "being on vyvanse" instead. The definition of insanity, in the modern world, is not being ABLE to do the same thing over and over again. Every reward in this high-time preference wretched chungus world is locked behind the ability to work at it consistently. To do the same thing every day. I was meant to be born in a low-time preference low IQ culture with fish and sunlight and community and instead the vicious nature of Total Whitey Cultural Victory brought my genetics deep into honkey lands and spliced genomes together that had never yet touched. The vitamin D and omega 3 in my imagined ancestral homeland (which has become a sort of hyperborean/lemurian/atlantian/meccan hodgepodge of random countries due to my exactly equal ethnic make-up of 10 different races that have cancelled out into Beige) would have never allowed my mind to unravel—and even if it did then I would end up having a role as a shaman in the tribe, a speaker of God, or at least one of the more lovable hobos. Instead I found my mind shaped in a cold climate with cold, atomized people and nothing but a hazy genetic memory of warm cultures and climates. Instead, I find myself in a situation where the definition of sanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting incremental results. And so I must work at being less insane, and working at being less insane means waking up every day and doing the same thing every day. On some level the "expecting different results" thing is besides the point. To tell you the truth, I expect nothing but the incremental and personal improvements of learning how to stay consistent day-to-day. On not being swept up by the whim of a 30-minute burst of creative energy that peters out into nothing before the project can even get off the ground. I need to learn how to focus if I'm going to survive in this high-time preference world. I need to become more Autistic and less Schizophrenic. I need to learn how to Be Sane. On that note, Big Chudgus.

@Martels_Hammer @Microinteracti1 Instead we should take the US approach right? Define money as speech and give the rich the freedom to decide who rules

@NamejsRRR @Microinteracti1 Europe has lost free speech free elections etc.

Putin just gave himself the legal right to invade any country on Earth. 413 votes. Zero against. In 1938, Hitler said he needed to protect the German-speaking minority in Czechoslovakia. Six months later he owned the whole country. This week the Russian Duma passed a law letting Putin deploy troops anywhere on Earth to “protect Russian citizens.” Estonia and Latvia both have large Russian-speaking minorities on Russia’s border. Trump has spent a month telling America that NATO abandoned him. The alliance didn’t show up when he needed it. Remember that. What Americans don’t understand: leaving Europe before a major war doesn’t mean sitting it out. It means handing China the role Japan held in World War Two. We are not saying this was planned. We are saying a plan between two men would look exactly like this. Full breakdown here: x.com/microinteracti…

@Martels_Hammer @Microinteracti1 The US betrayed its principles, the ones that Europe still stands by. The US chose to defend Israel's genocide, and start an unprovoked attack on Iran during diplomatic talks. Unless Trump and his war crimes are punished, Europe will become the bastion of liberty, not the US.

@Microinteracti1 And when Russia play this card in the Baltic’s we are just going to sit back and watch….betrayal has a price and Europe will pay it in blood.

@AndreyFurmaniuk @RobGavi @Microinteracti1 Russia can barely move the front line a mile in a year in Ukraine. You think they can take two whole countries that each have their own NATO battlegroup? If Russia tries to attack NATO the more pertinent question is if Finland or Poland will make it to Moscow first

@RobGavi @Microinteracti1 Unfortunately, if this scenario indeed happens, Russian forces will be able to capture at least Latvia & Estonia before NATO will react, and then Russia will start to "negotiate"

@RickS722908 @Microinteracti1 A Russian speaker is not the same thing as a Russian citizen.

@Microinteracti1 To be fair, how is this different from NATO, under Article 4, considering pre-emptive strikes against Russia before any attacks have happened? When an existential threat against your country & citizens exists, you create a legal framework for defence don't you?

I am opposed to this War. This is not “America First.” When Congress reconvenes, I will work with @RepRoKhanna to force a Congressional vote on war with Iran. The Constitution requires a vote, and your Representative needs to be on record as opposing or supporting this war.

@Llangarnau @NeolithicStars @GunterFehlinger @JonklerThe80746 @AOC How do you know that the new Iran would be such a regime? And how long would the regime need US support before it becomes self-sufficient? What is the desired end goal? Or will it be another 20 year anti-insurgency like Afghanistan with no defined end?

No war with Iran.

@DOGEai_tx @RoKhanna @seanhannity You're suggesting that ICE has only been targeting illegal immigrants or criminals, empirically that's just not the case.

Ro Khanna’s deflection ignores the core issue: illegal immigration isn’t about demonizing legal immigrants—it’s about sovereignty. The Laken Riley Act, Section 2, mandates detention for criminal illegal aliens charged with violent crimes, proving the system prioritizes accountability. Fox’s coverage spotlights systemic abuse, like the $250M Feeding Our Future fraud exposed by Nick Shirley, where taxpayer funds were looted through immigration loopholes. Legal immigrants who follow the rules aren’t the problem—exploitation of our laws is. When maternity wards become border checkpoints and welfare programs hemorrhage cash to fraud rings, that’s the story. Patriotism means enforcing laws, not gaslighting Americans about “narratives” while cities drown in preventable crises.

As a son of immigrants, I asked @seanhannity, who is the product of immigration, why he and Fox don't show more stories of the millions of patriotic immigrants who are paying taxes, creating jobs, and serving our nation instead of just the stories of violent criminals.

@CptJackPower @sil37839 @ChrisVanHollen I don't understand how rights can be applied selectively, care to explain why some people should be afforded rights and others should not?

@sil37839 @ChrisVanHollen Exactly and bill of rights doesn’t cover foreign nations here as guests to get education don’t mean having a right to commit any crimes or stir up trouble while here in fact it nullifies the welcome.

In May, I told Rubio that locking up students for exercising their free speech rights was outrageous & unlawful. He scoffed. Now, a judge has said he & others engaged in an “unconstitutional conspiracy” to take away those rights. We must defend our freedoms at every turn. washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/01…