Jean-Luc Van Damme

337 posts

Jean-Luc Van Damme

Jean-Luc Van Damme

@QWho

England Присоединился Ağustos 2008
375 Подписки27 Подписчики
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@Lord_FisherII Together we can forge a path for the civilised world, away from Chinese communism and Zionist imperialism.
English
0
0
1
393
MiX
MiX@eyes_on_Specter·
@QWho @nicholadrummond They can't cause of American military aid before 24 worth over 180 billion dollar that is more than Britain and France's military spending combined. Time is on the side of the Russian every European who believed Russia was weak had their capital taken by them berlin paris warsaw.
English
2
0
0
20
Nicholas Drummond
Nicholas Drummond@nicholadrummond·
The idea that Europe could easily and quickly become wholly independent from US military equipment is not credible. 🔷Europe relies heavily on US missile defence systems (Patriot, SM-3) 🔷No full European equivalent to US ballistic missile defence 🔷Interceptor stockpiles depend on US supply chains 🔷The F-35 underpins European airpower across multiple nations 🔷F-35 software updates are controlled by the US 🔷 Mission data files and targeting systems are US-owned 🔷Even Europe’s own jets rely on US weapons integration (e.g. AMRAAM) 🔷Switching to European weapons would be slow and complex 🔷The US dominates defence software in terms of functionality and quality 🔷 Europe lacks sovereign military cloud and data ecosystems 🔷ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) is heavily US-led 🔷Satellite communications depend significantly on US technology 🔷Air-to-air refuelling fleets rely on US capability and support 🔷C4ISR networks are deeply integrated with US systems 🔷Advanced microchips and electronics are largely US-origin 🔷These components underpin missiles, radars, and EW systems 🔷European munitions production still lags behind US scale and output 🔷Naval systems (e.g. Aegis integration) rely on US tech 🔷⅔ of European NATO arms imports come from the US Europe doesn’t just buy US weapons — it depends on US software, data, and enablers. Strategic independence would take decades, not years and to think we could overtake US technical superiority simply by producing our own equivalent weapons is delusional.
English
258
106
458
83.1K
MiX
MiX@eyes_on_Specter·
@QWho @nicholadrummond Russia would steamroll through Europe if it weren't for America's military, naval, and air presence. Europe has this Dunning-Kruger with Russia. America, with all its military might still believes Russia is an existential threat, tiny state in Europe with no military believe othe
English
1
0
1
20
MiX
MiX@eyes_on_Specter·
@QWho @nicholadrummond The challenge is to walk a tight rope with lava underneath, rearming takes decades, while the Russian threat is present today. None will take that leadership, Eastern European trusting France and Britain for there defenses would be a great historical irony.
English
1
0
0
21
MiX
MiX@eyes_on_Specter·
@QWho @nicholadrummond China is one country, with one national identity and a majority with a strong gov.if Europe wishes to rearm, it would have to take decade of unified massive investment, which is not feasible, seeing the rise of right-wing parties in Europe and a mature liberal population
English
1
0
2
43
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@eugyppius1 It has become a hot topic of Zionist agitators and Epstein class propagandists. Better to start a disastrous war and drive a wedge between the US and Europe than actually address any of the real problems of either side. Divide and conquer.
English
0
0
0
43
eugyppius
eugyppius@eugyppius1·
“we could pay down all our debt and wouldn’t have to pay taxes at all if we cut Europe loose” - this guy Europe is now becoming just an abstract symbol for everything that is not going well or that these people don’t like. It’s amazing.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

What if America is already far richer than anyone in the swamp is allowed to admit? What if the real drag on the Republic isn’t taxes, isn’t debt, isn’t even the deficit, it’s Europe? What if NATO was never a mutual defense pact, but a 75-year subscription America forgot to cancel? What if “burden sharing” is the most expensive euphemism in the English language? What if the City of London cabal is draining our banks? What if the advice from globalists is terrible advice that’s costing us big? What if every European basing agreement, every forward-deployed brigade, every Ramstein runway, every Aviano hangar, every Souda Bay pier is a tax American workers pay so Berlin can run a welfare state and Paris can run a 35-hour week? What if foreign aid to Europe isn’t aid, it’s tribute, flowing the wrong way? What if transporting the vast majority of trade on European owned ships costs more than we realize? What if the NGO archipelago in Brussels, Geneva, and The Hague is just a money-laundering loop where US taxpayer dollars get rinsed through a “civil society” conference and returned as lectures about our democracy? What if the UN isn’t a parliament of man, it’s a Manhattan timeshare with diplomatic plates, an accounting black hole, and a Human Rights Council chaired by people who’d jail you for tweeting this? What if “the rules-based international order” was always code for: Americans build it, Americans pay for it, Americans bleed for it, and Europeans grade it? What if $36 trillion in debt looks a lot smaller the second you stop underwriting a continent that sneers at you in three languages? What if you zeroed out the Europe line, the NATO line, the UN line, the NGO line, and woke up tomorrow in a country with the fiscal headroom to rebuild every shipyard, every foundry, every rail line, and every Navy hull we’ve let rot since the Cold War ended? What if American tourists went to American cathedrals, American opera, American museums, American cities instead. I’m not saying I believe all of it. I’m saying maybe, just maybe, we could pay down all our debt and wouldn’t have to pay taxes at all if we cut Europe loose.

English
61
68
1.3K
32.7K
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@stuey_beef We went to war with Germany and killed millions of our brothers to free Poland only to give it to the Soviets after the war. If we made peace with Hitler, who was an enormous Anglophile, London would still be a British city and we wouldn't be paying for our own replacement.
English
0
0
1
38
Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Trump didn’t call Starmer weak. He didn’t call him wrong. He called him Neville Chamberlain. The Prime Minister whose appeasement failed to stop the biggest war in human history. That is the reputation Britain now has on the world stage. And Keir Starmer put us there.
English
74
121
765
5.3K
Jason Reza Jorjani
Jason Reza Jorjani@Jason_Jorjani·
Let me be clear. If this operation takes place, the US Government will eventually be overthrown, Jews will be wiped off the face of the Earth, and the planet will be governed by Nazis. You can call me crazy, or go figure out why that would be the case, but it's what will happen.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

.@POTUS: "We have a plan, because of the power of our military, where every bridge in Iran will be decimated by 12 o’clock tomorrow night, where every power plant in Iran will be out of business...it'll happen over a period of 4hrs if we want it to. We don’t want that to happen."

English
207
56
589
90K
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@rutasosabu Yes but you must remember that president Trump is a completely ignorant and desperate blackmailed pedophile so this type of nonsense is to be expected.
English
0
0
0
9
Rutaso.Japan🇯🇵🐶
Rutaso.Japan🇯🇵🐶@rutasosabu·
Japan is unable to deploy to conflict zones due to Article 9 of its Constitution, which was created under U.S. influence. This should have already been communicated during the recent U.S.-Japan summit. Furthermore, Japan has just made an investment of approximately $630 billion in the United States outside of that. So isn’t this way of speaking unfair? It’s not as if Japan has done nothing.
Visioner@visionergeo

🇺🇸🪖🇰🇷🇦🇺🇯🇵🇮🇷 President Trump: It's not only NATO that didn't help us. South Korea didn’t help us. Australia didn’t help us. Japan didn’t help us. We’ve got 50,000 soldiers in Japan, 45,000 in South Korea, to protect them from Kim Jong Un, whom I get along very well with.

English
569
312
3.5K
415.7K
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@models_by_Russ Sounds like we're giving about the same help to them for this war as they did to us for the Falklands. A little bit more actually since we're letting them use multiple bases and are helping defensively to protect the gulf states. This is a war of aggression for Israel. Fuck off.
English
0
0
0
35
A View From Yorkshire 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
The UK had a choice when things kicked off. Stand properly with our closest ally… or hang back and pretend that sitting on the fence somehow looks like strength. And we chose the awkward middle ground — not quite in, not quite out, just… there. Now people will say that’s “measured” or “responsible.” But to anyone paying attention, it just looks like hesitation. Because the US isn’t just another country we occasionally agree with. It’s the backbone of NATO, the partner we lean on for intelligence, deterrence, and the kind of military weight that makes other nations think twice before doing anything stupid. Which is why this isn’t really about Iran at all. It’s about what happens if that backbone decides it’s had enough. Take the US out of NATO and what are you left with? A handful of capable countries, yes — but nothing like the same level of reach, power or deterrence. Certainly not enough to make the world’s bad actors lose sleep. And the UK? We’re good… but we’re not “replace the United States” good. Nobody in Europe is. So if Washington starts looking across the table and seeing allies who hedge, hesitate and only show up when it’s convenient, you can’t blame them for eventually asking what they’re getting out of it. That’s the bit people don’t like saying out loud. And here’s another question people dodge — if this had been any other US president, would we have been straight in, shoulder to shoulder without all the hesitation? It’s hard not to think a lot of this comes down to the fact that Western governments simply don’t like Trump. He’s not one of their usual, predictable operators, and that makes them nervous. Whether you rate him or not, that discomfort clearly plays into how willing they are to be seen standing alongside him. Instead, they reach for the Falklands. “Ah, but the Americans didn’t help us then.” Except they did — just not in the way people imagine. No Hollywood carrier group charging in, but plenty of the things that actually matter. Intelligence, logistics, weapons, and support through Ascension Island — which, yes, is British, but at the time was being run as a joint UK-US staging base. They could have made that operation far harder than it already was. They didn’t. They helped make it work. In other words, they showed up like real allies do — not for the headlines, but in ways that actually count. Which brings us back to now. Nobody’s saying we needed to blindly charge in. That’s not the point. But there’s a difference between acting independently and looking like you’re trying to keep everyone happy while committing to nothing. Alliances don’t survive on technicalities. They survive on trust. And if we start looking like the sort of country that wants the protection of NATO without ever really sticking its neck out when it matters, we shouldn’t be surprised if one day that protection starts to feel a bit… optional. Because without the US, NATO isn’t some iron shield. It’s a polite conversation. And that’s not much comfort when the world stops being polite.
English
199
116
582
19K
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@BullyEsq Also Europe contributed greatly to the Artemis mission, designing and building the propulsion, power systems and solar arrays of the Orion spacecraft.
English
0
0
1
145
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@BullyEsq We're having time off in Europe to celebrate the resurrection of Christ while your Baalist president who fucks kids threatens war crimes for a genocidal apartide state that thinks jesus is boiling in excrement in hell. If you're wondering who the bad guys are hope this helps.
English
0
0
5
172
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@Real_Politik101 I don't think we should be giving Chagos back but seeing the US ask to use our bases to commit war crimes while what's left of the maga cult post Epstein cheers it on gleefully is depressing to see.
English
0
0
0
176
MJ
MJ@Real_Politik101·
If NATO is gone, Argentina is definitely invading to retake the Falkland Islands. With Chagos, Starmer completely torched the deterrence Thatcher built with the last war. And Milei could easily take it. Britain can’t do anything. No ships. Now all of LATAM now recognizes Malvinas as Argentina’s. With them also becoming one of America’s most loyal ally, chances are high the U.S. stays out and lets it happen
Agustín Antonetti@agusantonetti

🇦🇷🇨🇱 | AHORA — Comunicado conjunto entre Argentina y Chile. - Chile anuncia su respaldo a Argentina en su reclamo por las Islas Malvinas. - Formarán reuniones de trabajo ampliadas para la atracción de inversiones y cooperación tecnológica. - Anuncio de cooperación en materia de seguridad para luchar contra el crimen organizado. - Modernización completa de los pasos fronterizos.

English
966
1K
8.4K
1.2M
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@Real_Politik101 NATO is a defensive alliance and this is sovereign British territory so would be a scenario where the US was obligated to help, unlike the war of aggression against Iran. I imagine Israel will probably supply Argentina with weapons again. Especially with a chabad president.
English
0
0
0
506
FalkTG 10k 🦅🇪🇺🇩🇪🇺🇦
I repeat: The U.S. sent thousands of its 19 years old soldiers to die in Normandy, to free Europe and to end the biggest crime against humanity ever commited - by Europeans. It was just 81 years ago. The whole reason, France, Benelux etc. 🇫🇷 exist today is because of this heroism. My grandparents could grow up in a liberal democracy. Without the U.S. they would be raised at the H*tler Youth. We Europeans would still be in wars again and again, like 1914, 1866, 1870, 1795 etc. They brought peace, democracy, liberty and human rights. They invested billions of U.S. Dollars into Europe with the Marshall Fund. They gave us more than we ever had in our history before. They protected us for 7 decades with hundreds of thousands of soldiers against the cruelties of the Soviet Union. The terror we can see nowadays in Donetsk, would have happened in Bavaria, Bourgogne or the Netherlands in 1950 if there wasn’t the U.S. 🇺🇸 Who do we Europeans think we are to let that nation down, act like bad allies, calling their President names every day on television - and have full confidence we stand better alone. All of instagram is just about, why we’re better than the U.S. We owe them so much. We Europeans are most arrogant species on earth. And to cure this we have to face the truth.
FalkTG 10k 🦅🇪🇺🇩🇪🇺🇦 tweet media
English
4.8K
8.5K
35K
1M
Jean-Luc Van Damme
@earlyvotedata If you're white you're literally European. You're turning your back on your homeland to destroy the petrodollar, your global hegemony and add more trillions in debt on forever wars for Israel because your politicians are captured by mossad and your president fucks kids. Wake up.
English
0
0
0
11
CA ET Nerd
CA ET Nerd@earlyvotedata·
As an American the single biggest thing that repulses me about Europeans is the fact that when you ask for relatively simple and easy things, they kick and scream at you like you are some sort of monster. The USA is done being used. Get in the game or sit on the sidelines.
Open Source Intel@Osint613

Thank you NATO *sarcasm*

English
240
398
6.7K
240.1K