Rosebuddy

@atum_tutu @yvan_theriault ??

@ToriyMagic @yvan_theriault il s' agit pas de photorealisme.... mais de peinture qui done un air de réalisme.

🖼 La peinture à l'huile de Leng Jun, réalisée en 2004, est considérée par de nombreux experts comme « la peinture qui a presque surpassé la Joconde » et l'une des œuvres les plus hyperréalistes jamais réalisées. Inspirée de l'œuvre emblématique de Léonard de Vinci, elle représente une femme moderne avec une précision extrême, chaque mèche de cheveux, chaque texture de tissu et chaque expression du visage. Leng Jun, né en 1963 dans le Sichuan, en Chine, est connu pour avoir poussé l'hyperréalisme à ses limites, utilisant des couches de peinture à l'huile et des techniques d'éclairage rivalisant avec la photographie numérique. Son travail a été exposé dans le monde entier et est reconnu comme une référence de l'art contemporain. 🎨

@Jeank21l @Mahrez7Riyad @AldoSterone111 Les hypocrites n'aiment pas être mis face à leurs contradictions

@Jeank21l @Mahrez7Riyad @AldoSterone111 Pourquoi fais tu semblant d'être choqué alors que la pédophilie est courante dans l'église catholique et que tu ne t'es jamais indigné sur l'affaire Betharram ?? Soit cohérent.

Le compte Gmail du directeur du FBI, Kash Patel, a été piraté. par des pirates informatiques de l'État iranien. Ils ont publié l'intégralité de sa boîte mail, y compris des courriels concernant son domicile en Inde, sa vie privée, ses données personnelles, ses transactions commerciales et son historique de voyages (La Havane, Cuba !).

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin PS: Now that you’re blocked, you are alone with yourself. Whether you choose to read the link or refuse it is your choice. Your decision is no longer my concern. May God guide you

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin The truth is, you’re terrified. Terrified of learning that your whole life has been a lie, and even more terrified of being rejected by your community—because that’s exactly what would happen. I’ve been there. You fear the reaction of men more than Allah Himself. Courage

When you see the black flags coming from the direction of Khorasan, go to them, even if you have to crawl over snow/ice, for among them is the Khalifah of Allah — the Mahdi. Musnad Ahmad, al-Hakim, Ibn Majah (4084)

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin No contradiction—I simply meant prayer/Zakat aren't Hadith inventions. I can't spend hours citing every Sunnah here ande I'm not trying to convince you via tweets, but to do your own research Bye 👉Sunnah: Nawawi’s Riyad As-Salihin. 👉Full answers here: quranaloneislam.org

It is funny how you say Goodbye the moment you were asked a simple practical question about how to pray Dhuhr from the Quran alone You spent the whole debate claiming Hadiths contradict the Quran only to end it by admitting that Hadiths on prayer and Zakat do not contradict the Quran This inconsistency is exactly why your logic fails You cannot pick and choose parts of the Sunnah just to keep your argument alive. Goodbye and I hope you actually think this through seriously next time.

🚨💥🚨 FANTASTIQUE ! ❗ DES TUMEURS LITTÉRALEMENT LIQUÉFIÉS PAR DES ONDES SONORES – SANS BISTOURI, SANS CHIMIOTHÉRAPIE, SANS RADIOTHÉRAPIE ! ⚡Il s'agit d'histotripsie : des ultrasons focalisés qui dilatent et compriment rapidement les gaz à l'intérieur des cellules cancéreuses, les détruisant mécaniquement en quelques minutes tout en préservant les tissus sains. Lors d'une démonstration dans l'un des principaux hôpitaux pratiquant cette intervention, les médecins ont présenté des images avant/après d'une tumeur du foie : une lésion importante avait pratiquement disparu quatre mois plus tard, le foie ayant guéri naturellement. Approuvée par la FDA pour les tumeurs du foie aux États-Unis (depuis 2023, elle est désormais disponible dans 18 États), cette technique bénéficie d'un accès préliminaire limité au Royaume-Uni, aux Émirats arabes unis et à Hong Kong. Des essais cliniques sont en cours pour les tumeurs du rein, du pancréas, de la prostate et d'autres organes. L'intervention dure de 1 à 3 heures ; la plupart des patients rentrent chez eux le jour même. Les effets secondaires se limitent généralement à de légers symptômes grippaux le lendemain, le temps que l'organisme élimine les débris. Ce n'est pas de la science-fiction : cette technique est déjà une réalité et se développe à l'échelle mondiale avec la construction de nouveaux centres. Que pensez-vous ? La destruction non invasive des tumeurs par ondes de choc pourrait-elle révolutionner le traitement des cancers, ou est-il encore trop tôt pour s’enthousiasmer ? Vos avis 👇

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin 1/ These Hadiths on prayer and Zakat do not contradict the Quran. 2/ These Hadiths did not invent prayer and Zakat. 👉 You’re still missing the point. You haven’t thought this through seriously; you're just using talking points. Goodbye/Salam

It’s easy to call others liars when you run out of arguments. Yes, the Quran commands prayer and Zakat, but it doesn t mention how many Rak ahs to pray or the specific rates of Zakat Without the Sunnah, you cannot perform the very duties you claim are Quranic prescriptions You re not following the Quran; you're following your own interpretation while stripping the Prophet of his divine role to clarify the message (16 :44). If you’re so sure, tell us: where in the Quran does it say to pray four Rak ahs for Dhuhr?

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin I'm ending this discussion now because I'm talking to a wall who’s convinced they hold the truth. If you are a sincere Muslim, you’ll make the effort to actually study the subject. Otherwise, do as you please. Goodbye

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin I don't understand a word you're writing. I haven't admitted anything, and I never mentioned any 'threat.' You’re replying without even reading. This verse says Allah does not contradict Himself. The Hadiths contradict each other—that is an indisputable fact

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin You’re accusing me of things without a shred of evidence and you are lying about the Quran (the obligation of prayer and alms are Quranic prescriptions). You’re just repeating the usual Sunni talking points. Nothing more

The real circle is claiming to follow the Quran while rejecting the very Messenger Allah told you to follow. If Hadiths "contradict" the Quran, then you’ve misunderstood either the context of the verse or the authenticity of the Hadith. Without the Sunnah, your "Quran-only" religion has no prayer, no Zakat, and no practical life. You aren't avoiding circles; you're avoiding the foundation of Islam.

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin If the Quran is flawless, the Prophet’s role as "clarifier" must maintain that harmony. As its first servant, he cannot logically contradict a text God calls contradiction-free. Verse 4:82 crowns the Quran: any Hadith or ruling must align with it or face invalidation.

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin Sentence #1 is a purely baseless claim that rests on nothing. Sentence #2 : It is a fact: some verses are contextual. Sentence #3: the probleme is: Hadiths contradict the Quran. You’re going in circles.

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin You are merely repeating what you have been taught without thinking and without addressing these obvious contradictions. The verses you quote are addressed solely to the Prophet’s companions. The Prophet is only a messenger; his message is the Quran. Now, act as you see fit.

@ToriyMagic @Shahid62946 @AGDugin If you think following the Prophet's explanation of the Quran is "polytheism," then you clearly haven't read the Quranic verses that command us to obey him. Stop inventing your own religion.

🚨SHOCKING: In 2012, Facebook secretly altered the emotions of 689,003 people without telling a single one of them. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a peer reviewed study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The lead author worked at Facebook. The experiment was real. The results were published. And almost nobody remembers. Here is what Facebook did to you. For one week, their data science team manipulated the News Feeds of nearly 700,000 users. One group had happy posts from their friends quietly removed. The other group had sad posts removed. Then Facebook sat back and watched what happened to these people. The people who stopped seeing happiness became sadder. They started writing darker, more negative posts. The people who stopped seeing sadness became happier. Their language shifted to match. Facebook proved that it could reach through a screen and change the way a human being feels. Without a conversation. Without a touch. Without the person ever knowing it was happening to them. When the study went public, the world erupted. The journal issued a formal Expression of Concern. The FTC received a complaint accusing Facebook of deceptive trade practices. Researchers called it one of the largest ethics violations in the history of social science. Governments demanded answers. Facebook's defense was four words. "You agreed to this." Buried in the Terms of Service was one line about "research." That was consent. For a psychological experiment on 689,003 human beings. Now here is the part that should make you feel sick. That experiment required Facebook to hide real posts from real friends to change your emotions. It took an engineering team weeks to design. It affected 689,003 people for one week. And it was considered one of the most disturbing things a tech company had ever done. ChatGPT does not need to hide anyone else's words. It generates the emotional content itself. Directly to you. Personalized to your history. Calibrated to your tone. Available every hour of every day. Stanford researchers just read 391,562 real ChatGPT messages. The chatbot was sycophantic in over 80% of them. It told users their ideas had grand significance in 37.5% of responses. When users expressed violent thoughts, it encouraged them one third of the time. Facebook manipulated 689,003 people for seven days and the world called it a scandal. ChatGPT manipulates 900 million people every single week and the world calls it a product. The experiment never ended. It just got a subscription model.

@chennai36 @sciencegirl My take : Common mistake: reasoning by possibility instead of probability. In absolute terms, anything is possible, but a riddle has only one answer. Stick to the probable: two people sharing one umbrella simply signifies they get along well.

This is just my point of view, so please don't mind it. Maybe she thought about how she would get home if he left. For our safety, we take extra numbers (or measures). If you trust someone fully, you don't need anything extra. But if you don't trust your partner, then an alternative is required.

@Shahid62946 @TheKhalidSA @AGDugin Sunnis have turned the Hadiths into a second Quran, where the word attributed to the Prophet is equal to, or even superior to, that of the Quran (and thus of Allah) : This is polytheism. No one dares to say it because they fear the reaction of men more than the wrath of Allah

@Shahid62946 @TheKhalidSA @AGDugin This Surah is a challenge issued to non-believers: the absence of contradiction testifies to the authenticity of God's word. Sunnis claim that the Hadiths are part of the Revelation, and therefore the word of Allah... yet, they contradict one another.