APW
6.9K posts


Sabreena Maerchant always on the wrong side of everything. What is this?!? The tournament is about grit and grind to get to the next round, it’s not gonna be perfect basketball. We’ve seen that on the men’s side, Michigan has been blowing teams out. This is so distasteful
The Athletic@TheAthletic
The Final Four on Friday night was not a great showcase for women’s college basketball. UConn looked incapable of running a secondary offensive set. UCLA had a season-high 23 turnovers. South Carolina missed 15 layups, and Texas’ best offensive player missed 20 field goals.
English

@ttg626 @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee The original tweet I commented on wasn't about revenue so you created that argument. You don't dictate nothing round here 😂😂
English

@alluringAP @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee You're making a different argument. Lol. We are talking about women's CBB being established as a revenue generator and interest drawer for FANS. Not whether or not HS girls will still want to play CBB (obviously they will).
English

meanwhile the men's final four featured matchups where:
- both teams shot under 36% from the field
- a team, ranked no. 1 for weeks, was down by 30 with under 7 minutes to go
where is the commentary about the future of the men's game?
The Athletic@TheAthletic
The Final Four on Friday night was not a great showcase for women’s college basketball. UConn looked incapable of running a secondary offensive set. UCLA had a season-high 23 turnovers. South Carolina missed 15 layups, and Texas’ best offensive player missed 20 field goals.
English

@ttg626 @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee You brought up revenue as one of your terms, no different than the argument against the W players getting paid. So many young girls are waiting in line for their turn to play college ball and go pro. When that stops then we have a problem.
English

@alluringAP @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee Women's basketball "being around" a long time does not mean it is established in terms of POPULARITY and REVENUE GENERATION.
That is what we are talking about here. And the revenue disparity is not due to "racism" and "sexism." Women also generally prefer to watch men's hoops
English

@gradeafun @Jay_3shifty You don't have to do it all game, and SC plays enough players for it to work.
English

@Jay_3shifty Because you have to ask yourself, can you maintain that long enough for it to be effective without wearing yourself out. I know people believe these athletes are robots but they are humans who get tired. Also, it's likely they assumed UCLA would be prepared for it. SMH
English

@alex_abads @phxsunz25 And the men's final 4 wasn't? Both games were boring and the camera angles were horrendous.
English

@ttg626 @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee Women's basketball is well established, been around as long as the men. As long as racism and sexism exist there will be a revenue disparity regardless of the product. Final 4s from all sides were shaky and that Indy arena and camera angle is as awful as it gets.
English

@alluringAP @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee "Growing significantly" does not mean "established." A child being "growing" doesnt mean they are already tall. It means they are headed in the right direction and *COULD* be tall one day. Right now there are barely any profitable women's CBB teams (unlike the men).


English

@ttg626 @TylerSchrepfer @michaelmcgee That doesn't mean the women aren't established. Read that last sentence.
English

@WBBfanz When South Carolina cant dominate the paint they struggle because they really don’t have an auto bucket getting on their team like a Booker, Blakes or Cotie
English

@yanab0015 I actually think this team overachieved overall.
English

@michaelmcgee I watched some of the Illinois UCONN game yesterday and it had been a while since I watched a men's NCAA game with good teams. The players looked hillariously gigantic. For some reason that doesn't happen with NBA games. Not sure if spacing or camera angle or what
English

@michaelmcgee Because the men are already established and the women are trying to establish themselves
English

@apenandanapkin @UConnWBB @GamecockWBB @TexasWBB @UCLAWBB You wrote a dissertation full of bull💩. Gtfoh
English

I coached women's basketball for 27 out of my 28 years, so this is important to me.
Four things, to be clear:
1. I did not watch @UConnWBB vs. @GamecockWBB
2. Whatever happened between Geno and Staley was not good.
3. I did watch @TexasWBB vs. @UCLAWBB
4. I don't have a dog in the fight. I literally could care less who wins the natty.
Most are focused on Geno and Staley. To me, the bigger story is the poor offensive basketball, largely spurred on by officiating that has allowed overtly physical defense.
62, 51, 48 and 44 points. By this history teacher's math, that's an average of 51 ppg.
That is not good for the game.
I get that the players can be tight/nervous, the scout is on point and sometimes teams have bad nights, but I've also seen and coached enough ball to know when the physicality is detrimental to the game and the product. That happened last night, by most unbiased accounts.
I'm not saying they're shouldn't be physicality. I also don't want to see a 110-108 layup drill.
You can allow for some physicality while also allowing for flow and freedom of movement. Grabbing and hugging off ball cutters, putting two hands on dribble drives or wrapping up a player trying to post up is not entertaining nor good for the game.
I also don't believe in the argument of "we want the players to decide who should win". Basketball is and always has been a game of offensive skill, not about who can out-shove the other team. There's other sports for that . . .
Just call the game it was intended to be officiated. If it's a foul, call it. Don't allow teams to foul 100 times because they'll only call the most obvious 15-20. If they foul 100 times, call it 100 times. The players and coaches will adjust.
These teams are awesome. The players are awesome. The coaching is top notch. But this is the game's biggest stage; let's put players in a position to display what they're capable of and, more importantly, to entertain and grow the game.
62-48 and 51-44 with a 20-17 halftime score won't grow the game. It will only stunt it.
There. That thud you heard was me jumping off my soap box.
English

@Coach_Hickey5 Well those men's final 4 games were nothing short of a snooze fest.
English

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THAT WEAK ASS APOLOGY! APOLOGIZE TO DAWN FOR ACTING LIKE A BITCH!
ESPN@espn
Geno Auriemma's statement following his exchange with Dawn Staley at the end of UConn’s loss to South Carolina.

@trendyhoopstars This is not good for Kim. She can justify losing current players by saying it was a bad mix, but losing Mickey Ds recruits is costly
She better not go to SC either, became the front court is already loaded. She won’t play
English


@alluringAP @Ro_Co_Vols She will not be going to UT. Bookmark it.
English












